Mr.NiceGuy

Mr.NiceGuy — CS2 Stats

DE76561199635161202[U:1:1674895474]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,150Tracked matches57%Win rate2024Tracked since
6,631Hours in CS88Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,754 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,754 → 1,754
+77Tracked matches · now 3,150
+3.3ppWin rate · 53.3% → 56.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 36 days played since 27 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,754 +0 1 Sept4 Sept · 2 observations
1,7541,754peak 1,7541 Sept4 Sept
1,754Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-06-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,754
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 247 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,320), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate40.3%48.3%51.0%10.6% short
Shot accuracy0.0%13.2%13.7%13.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.961.071.090.12 short
Match win rate48.8%46.9%48.4%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMr.NiceGuyFACEITLevel 9 · 1,754 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,754csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning67
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5050Last 10050%Win rateLWWLWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · +50ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 499ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility5.3
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning6.7
Utility5.3
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time511ms−79ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 511ms
Headshot accuracy15.1%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 15.4% → last ⅓ avg 15.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–2 · ancient, 17 Jul
35%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · dust2, 8 Jul
359msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · ancient, 17 Aug
13–2Biggest win · cache, 17 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
129In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 9dust2Weakest map · 45% over 33
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B33151845%-0.00
ancientB25121348%0.01
infernoB23121152%-0.01
anubisS96367%0.00
cacheS64267%-0.01
nuke31233%-0.01
mirage1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 33). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

60,512Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
3,384Matches
48.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
40.3%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
7,820MVPs
1,792Hours (in match)
5,232Bombs planted
1,342Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4718,392
AWP8,840
MAC-103,128
AUG2,444
MP92,311
Knife2,013

Lifetime map wins

8,830inferno
7,731dust2
2,304nuke
862vertigo
752train
291office
2ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,049Matches
49%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
74.3ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno67651%1.0714.7
Dust262747%1.0214.5
Ancient52448%1.0715.6
Mirage42746%1.1015.0
Anubis31851%1.0815.6
Nuke18644%0.9813.8
Overpass15458%1.0815.0
Train6253%1.0114.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.2%Headshot accuracy
37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.0%Spray accuracy
87.4%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
511msReaction time
24.4%T opening success
61.4%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
10.55HE damage / grenade
5.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4999 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.4131% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 33 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–13-0.0520%19 Sept
inferno13–60.0418%18 Sept
ancient16–120.018%18 Sept
dust214–160.0114%18 Sept
ancient13–70.0013%17 Sept
inferno13–80.0712%16 Sept
dust25–13-0.0422%13 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0816%10 Sept
dust216–120.0530%9 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0611%4 Sept
inferno13–80.0423%2 Sept
dust213–11-0.0519%2 Sept
cache10–13-0.0411%29 Aug
ancient9–130.0418%26 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0020%24 Aug
ancient2–13-0.055%19 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0218%18 Aug
ancient13–50.1223%17 Aug
anubis17–19-0.0111%17 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0215%17 Aug
dust219–160.0014%17 Aug
cache16–14-0.0217%16 Aug
dust213–60.0210%16 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0017%15 Aug
ancient16–130.0216%15 Aug
ancient13–30.0411%15 Aug
dust213–110.0811%15 Aug
ancient11–130.0010%10 Aug
inferno16–120.0113%10 Aug
dust29–13-0.0010%5 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0314%30 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0211%25 Jul
dust29–130.0217%25 Jul
inferno8–130.0317%25 Jul
dust213–4-0.028%25 Jul
ancient9–130.0113%25 Jul
dust210–13-0.0127%25 Jul
anubis13–100.026%23 Jul
dust28–13-0.0525%23 Jul
dust24–13-0.0310%18 Jul
dust213–40.0714%18 Jul
ancient19–16-0.0113%18 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0415%18 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0414%17 Jul
cache5–13-0.022%17 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0117%17 Jul
cache13–20.0214%17 Jul
ancient13–20.2122%17 Jul
dust213–11-0.0511%17 Jul
dust213–60.0419%17 Jul
dust213–80.0127%16 Jul
dust211–13-0.0418%16 Jul
dust29–130.0122%15 Jul
inferno13–90.0315%15 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0610%15 Jul
anubis13–80.0211%15 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0312%13 Jul
inferno4–13-0.056%13 Jul
dust28–13-0.0711%13 Jul
inferno13–100.0117%12 Jul
dust213–80.0625%12 Jul
ancient16–190.0518%12 Jul
inferno8–130.0023%12 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0213%11 Jul
cache13–11-0.0210%11 Jul
inferno13–3-0.009%11 Jul
nuke9–13-0.058%11 Jul
inferno13–110.0312%10 Jul
nuke13–100.0317%10 Jul
anubis13–60.1616%10 Jul
dust210–13-0.0117%10 Jul
ancient11–130.0015%10 Jul
dust211–13-0.0320%10 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0116%10 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0714%8 Jul
cache13–100.038%8 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0119%8 Jul
dust26–130.0120%8 Jul
dust26–13-0.0335%8 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0120%6 Jul
inferno2–13-0.069%6 Jul
anubis13–100.0220%6 Jul
ancient13–100.028%5 Jul
dust29–130.0012%5 Jul
ancient12–160.0415%5 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0012%5 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0413%5 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0312%5 Jul
dust29–13-0.0326%5 Jul
dust216–14-0.049%5 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0012%5 Jul
dust211–13-0.0315%1 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0919%1 Jul
ancient22–19-0.0411%1 Jul
dust213–10-0.0210%1 Jul
dust216–13-0.0413%29 Jun
dust210–130.0312%29 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0316%29 Jun
inferno6–130.0121%29 Jun
dust213–90.0313%27 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →