n0ppa_

n0ppa_ — CS2 Stats

76561199587226702[U:1:1626960974]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

496Tracked matches54%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating9,999Light Blue band · top ~54.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,999 +2,564 8 Oct – 3 Nov · 18 days played
5,7779,999peak 9,9998 Oct3 Nov
10,374Peak Premier in tracked matches
23Days played since 2026-10-08

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 9,999
  • +2,564 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGn0ppa_FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER9,999 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning60
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50–45–5Last 10050%Win rateWWLLWWTWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +2.2pp headshot accuracy · +51ms reaction

Win rate up 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 666ms

Last 10

  • 7–2–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 646ms

Last 20

  • 9–8–3 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 621ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility4.9
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 41% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 607ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning6.0
Utility4.9
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time619ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 635ms → last ⅓ avg 619ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%−3.7%
first ⅓ avg 21.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 28 Oct →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · mirage, 8 Oct →
477msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · mirage, 23 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 31 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
W2Current streak
9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 81% over 21infernoWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2117–481%0.06
ancientA1610–663%0.01
dust2C166–1038%0.05
mirageB157–847%0.06
infernoD123–925%0.03
anubisD124–833%0.01
cacheC73–443%0.04
vertigo—10–10%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

75Matches
49%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
73.6ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient1656%0.9612.6
Mirage1436%1.3515.6
Nuke1267%1.0915.4
Anubis933%1.1317.3
Cache967%1.0914.2
Dust2729%0.8410.7
Inferno540%0.8714.0
Vertigo367%1.0014.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
38.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
76.3%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
607msReaction time
40.9%T opening success
60.4%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
6.32HE damage / grenade
13.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4536 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno14–120.1015%3 Nov →
anubis13–110.0624%3 Nov →
inferno7–13-0.0235%3 Nov →
mirage5–130.0123%3 Nov →
cache13–40.0519%3 Nov →
ancient16–130.0612%3 Nov →
anubis15–150.0316%2 Nov →
cache5–00.0618%2 Nov →
anubis13–11-0.0017%2 Nov →
nuke13–9-0.0318%2 Nov →
dust211–130.0318%2 Nov →
nuke13–20.0617%2 Nov →
anubis11–130.0312%2 Nov →
dust210–13-0.0423%2 Nov →
anubis6–130.0115%1 Nov →
nuke5–90.0514%1 Nov →
inferno8–8-0.0315%1 Nov →
inferno13–160.0523%1 Nov →
ancient13–90.1826%1 Nov →
inferno15–15-0.0113%31 Oct →
nuke16–140.1114%31 Oct →
mirage8–130.0820%31 Oct →
inferno9–40.1120%31 Oct →
ancient16–120.0012%31 Oct →
dust211–130.0222%31 Oct →
nuke13–40.0314%31 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0520%31 Oct →
nuke13–10.0019%31 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0119%31 Oct →
anubis10–130.048%31 Oct →
ancient3–130.0216%31 Oct →
ancient13–70.0217%31 Oct →
anubis13–60.0011%30 Oct →
nuke14–160.0515%30 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0122%30 Oct →
dust213–30.069%30 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0616%30 Oct →
ancient13–100.0322%30 Oct →
dust215–150.0116%30 Oct →
mirage13–70.0714%30 Oct →
nuke9–20.1313%30 Oct →
nuke13–30.0819%30 Oct →
dust29–130.0527%29 Oct →
dust213–30.0819%29 Oct →
dust213–30.2228%28 Oct →
inferno15–150.0321%28 Oct →
nuke13–30.1135%28 Oct →
ancient13–100.0112%28 Oct →
dust213–10.1425%27 Oct →
inferno11–130.0414%27 Oct →
mirage16–120.0325%27 Oct →
dust27–130.0613%27 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.008%27 Oct →
nuke13–100.0918%26 Oct →
nuke16–140.1222%26 Oct →
anubis10–130.0614%25 Oct →
ancient10–130.0222%25 Oct →
anubis8–130.0417%25 Oct →
mirage13–30.0913%25 Oct →
inferno4–90.0414%25 Oct →
inferno13–30.0511%25 Oct →
mirage13–80.079%25 Oct →
nuke13–80.1018%25 Oct →
mirage7–130.1230%25 Oct →
ancient16–130.0418%24 Oct →
nuke13–40.0916%24 Oct →
nuke16–120.0619%24 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0410%24 Oct →
nuke13–80.1021%24 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0217%24 Oct →
nuke13–50.0512%23 Oct →
mirage4–130.0421%23 Oct →
mirage13–70.1519%23 Oct →
mirage13–50.0432%23 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0614%22 Oct →
ancient13–90.0629%22 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0024%21 Oct →
cache14–160.047%20 Oct →
nuke13–20.0615%20 Oct →
vertigo7–13-0.0839%19 Oct →
nuke14–16-0.0512%19 Oct →
ancient16–14-0.0411%18 Oct →
inferno5–130.0123%17 Oct →
ancient2–13-0.0922%14 Oct →
dust24–130.0015%11 Oct →
nuke4–130.016%11 Oct →
mirage9–130.0219%10 Oct →
cache13–10.0517%10 Oct →
dust27–130.0540%10 Oct →
nuke13–60.0416%10 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0315%9 Oct →
dust211–130.0821%9 Oct →
mirage7–130.0622%9 Oct →
ancient5–12-0.0313%8 Oct →
dust213–20.0516%8 Oct →
ancient13–110.0117%8 Oct →
cache9–130.1216%8 Oct →
dust213–110.0212%8 Oct →
mirage0–130.04100%8 Oct →
mirage13–30.1038%8 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.