assassinX

assassinX — CS2 Stats

MC76561199580510704[U:1:1620244976]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,317Tracked matches60%Win rate2024Tracked since
3,154Hours in CS22Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,912Top 25% of 210,006 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#32836 of 257108 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,113 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,912 +2,244 5 Sept – 22 Oct · 21 days played
20,04723,912peak 23,9125 Sept22 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,113 +0 7 Sept – 4 Oct · 2 observations
1,1131,113peak 1,1137 Sept4 Oct
23,912Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,113Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-09-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,113
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 88 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-07
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-07

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 23,912
  • +2,157 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,088 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-07
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,220), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate45.9%45.7%46.8%meets
Shot accuracy0.0%12.7%13.0%13.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.891.051.060.17 short
Match win rate48.1%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGassassinXFACEITLevel 7 · 1,113 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER23,912 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,113csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning61
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53–45–2Last 10053%Win rateWWWWLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · −50ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 660ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 648ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 673ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility5.0
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch2.8

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 76% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 76% on T to 33% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 655ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning6.1
Utility5.0
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels5.4
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time654ms+21ms
first ⅓ avg 633ms → last ⅓ avg 654ms
Headshot accuracy20.2%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–1 · cache, 27 Sept →
39%Best headshot accuracy · 9–4 · inferno, 13 Sept →
469msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · inferno, 12 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 27 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W4Current streak
8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 82% over 11infernoWeakest map · 41% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB209–1145%-0.02
infernoC177–1041%-0.01
cacheA159–660%-0.01
dust2B147–750%-0.02
nukeS119–282%-0.01
anubisA117–464%-0.00
ancient—42–250%-0.05
office—32–167%-0.02
train—21–150%-0.04
vertigo—20–20%-0.09
boulder—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

79,618Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
5,125Matches
48.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
45.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
11,226MVPs
3,398Hours (in match)
2,863Bombs planted
1,053Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4728,506
MP95,152
AWP4,126
MAC-103,642
Tec-91,146

Lifetime map wins

9,005inferno
7,566dust2
4,829nuke
3,718vertigo
722italy
674office
649train
26ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

679Matches
51%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
79.0ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage17249%0.9213.9
Dust211847%1.0115.1
Anubis10351%0.9413.8
Inferno9260%1.1614.3
Ancient7151%0.9315.5
Nuke6252%0.9815.0
Vertigo3850%0.8815.1
Cache1338%0.8915.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
31.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.6%Spray accuracy
73.5%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
655msReaction time
75.5%T opening success
33.5%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
10.6%Flash assists
9.96HE damage / grenade
6.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 33.4858% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–7-0.0224%22 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0022%22 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0218%22 Oct →
nuke16–13-0.0021%21 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0417%21 Oct →
nuke13–60.0115%21 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.047%21 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0226%21 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0124%21 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0119%20 Oct →
boulder5–13-0.0418%20 Oct →
train1–13-0.0818%20 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0819%18 Oct →
ancient13–4-0.0520%18 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0519%18 Oct →
mirage13–90.0018%18 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0122%18 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0021%18 Oct →
office9–130.0425%15 Oct →
train13–40.0021%15 Oct →
inferno7–9-0.0135%15 Oct →
anubis13–80.0124%13 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0518%12 Oct →
office13–9-0.0629%12 Oct →
office13–6-0.0314%12 Oct →
mirage10–130.0319%11 Oct →
dust213–16-0.0614%10 Oct →
inferno6–90.0333%9 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0219%8 Oct →
anubis13–90.0517%8 Oct →
inferno13–3-0.0312%7 Oct →
inferno8–130.0518%7 Oct →
cache13–100.0221%5 Oct →
inferno13–80.0317%4 Oct →
anubis10–130.0112%3 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0111%3 Oct →
dust216–130.0118%3 Oct →
vertigo8–8-0.0023%2 Oct →
inferno3–9-0.1022%2 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0425%1 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0318%30 Sept →
inferno13–30.0719%30 Sept →
nuke13–110.0124%30 Sept →
dust216–12-0.0217%30 Sept →
nuke13–50.0422%30 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0227%29 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0114%28 Sept →
cache13–3-0.0219%28 Sept →
inferno13–20.0522%28 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0117%28 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0212%28 Sept →
cache13–110.0619%28 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0219%27 Sept →
inferno14–160.0016%27 Sept →
inferno6–130.0314%27 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0418%27 Sept →
nuke3–30.0114%27 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0813%27 Sept →
cache13–10.0929%27 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0229%26 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0226%26 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0424%26 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0423%26 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0424%25 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0221%25 Sept →
anubis13–90.0519%25 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0716%25 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0419%25 Sept →
anubis13–4-0.0124%18 Sept →
nuke13–70.0318%18 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0118%18 Sept →
mirage15–150.0121%18 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0112%18 Sept →
dust26–130.0521%14 Sept →
vertigo2–9-0.1822%13 Sept →
nuke4–9-0.1221%13 Sept →
inferno9–4-0.0639%13 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.1119%13 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0225%12 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0617%12 Sept →
nuke13–90.0512%12 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0119%12 Sept →
dust216–12-0.0118%11 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0315%11 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0710%11 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0622%10 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0519%10 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0515%10 Sept →
mirage13–70.0530%10 Sept →
cache2–13-0.0512%9 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0331%9 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0316%9 Sept →
anubis7–130.0120%9 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0619%9 Sept →
mirage16–140.0117%9 Sept →
anubis13–50.0024%9 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0516%8 Sept →
anubis16–13-0.0123%8 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0521%8 Sept →
cache16–120.0118%5 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.