potato.lover

potato.lover — CS2 Stats

DE76561199563144382[U:1:1602878654]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

790Tracked matches48%Win rate2024Tracked since
1,407Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.4 StrongAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating23,872Top 25% of 211,308 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#33515 of 258252 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,351 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Oct 2026 (19 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,872 +2,057 23 Aug – 9 Oct · 21 days played
20,00026,316peak 26,31623 Aug9 Oct
26,574Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,351Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-08-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,351
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 180 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,444 below peak (26,316)
  • -2,160 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,128 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate54.7%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy0.0%13.2%13.7%13.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.891.071.090.20 short
Match win rate48.4%46.9%48.4%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpotato.loverFACEITLevel 9 · 1,351 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,872 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,351csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning64
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–42–4Last 10054%Win rateWWTWLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −1.8pp headshot accuracy · +70ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 510ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim9.0
Utility6.2
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch5.8

Sharp aimerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 68% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 68% on T to 51% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning6.4
Utility6.2
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels7.4
Win Impact4.4

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time513ms−56ms
first ⅓ avg 569ms → last ⅓ avg 513ms
Headshot accuracy23.4%−4.0%
first ⅓ avg 27.4% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 2–3 · nuke, 26 Aug →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · mirage, 2 Sept →
352msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · nuke, 19 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 17 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
7–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 63% over 16dust2Weakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA1710–759%0.04
infernoB168–850%0.02
anubisA1610–663%0.03
mirageA138–562%0.02
cacheA138–562%0.04
ancientB115–645%0.05
dust2D93–633%0.01
vertigo—21–150%0.05
office—10–10%0.06
train—11–0100%0.05
overpass—10–10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

61,714Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
2,337Matches
48.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
54.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 9 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
7,107MVPs
1,019Hours (in match)
903Bombs planted
521Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,343dust2
2,438inferno
2,212nuke
1,317vertigo
251train
220office
81italy
36ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

164Matches
59%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
88.6ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

49%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5353%1.1317.6
Ancient2767%1.3718.4
Dust22462%1.0815.5
Inferno2157%1.1116.1
Anubis1354%1.4620.5
Nuke1369%1.3019.5
Overpass729%1.1518.1
Cache367%2.0919.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.5%Headshot accuracy
38.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.6%Spray accuracy
86.2%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
511msReaction time
68.4%T opening success
50.9%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
11.9%Flash assists
11.54HE damage / grenade
8.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–100.0126%17 Oct →
nuke13–10.1015%17 Oct →
office12–120.0634%17 Oct →
train13–50.0526%10 Oct →
ancient2–130.0525%9 Oct →
inferno8–130.0412%9 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0419%7 Oct →
cache13–16-0.0110%5 Oct →
overpass11–13-0.0635%3 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0124%2 Oct →
anubis19–160.0418%1 Oct →
ancient13–80.0619%30 Sept →
nuke9–130.0626%30 Sept →
inferno13–2-0.0338%29 Sept →
cache10–130.1027%29 Sept →
inferno5–130.0226%28 Sept →
ancient12–160.0420%27 Sept →
anubis1–13-0.0720%27 Sept →
inferno13–100.0429%27 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0122%25 Sept →
ancient13–50.0431%24 Sept →
vertigo13–110.0732%23 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0220%21 Sept →
dust210–130.0619%20 Sept →
ancient13–60.1228%20 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0020%20 Sept →
nuke22–20-0.0113%19 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0227%19 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0929%19 Sept →
anubis13–30.0737%19 Sept →
anubis13–100.0525%18 Sept →
mirage6–2-0.020%18 Sept →
mirage13–90.0221%13 Sept →
mirage19–150.0621%11 Sept →
anubis15–150.0222%7 Sept →
anubis5–130.0113%7 Sept →
inferno7–130.0328%6 Sept →
dust216–120.0121%6 Sept →
cache13–90.0317%6 Sept →
inferno13–90.0920%5 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0123%5 Sept →
anubis13–80.0121%5 Sept →
cache13–80.0317%5 Sept →
cache13–20.0741%5 Sept →
anubis13–90.0021%5 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0221%5 Sept →
cache13–20.0420%5 Sept →
cache13–110.0125%5 Sept →
dust213–70.0530%5 Sept →
inferno13–80.0217%5 Sept →
anubis8–130.0217%5 Sept →
cache13–50.0916%4 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0422%4 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0327%4 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0624%4 Sept →
nuke13–50.0616%4 Sept →
inferno6–90.1236%4 Sept →
nuke7–90.1412%4 Sept →
cache13–70.0127%4 Sept →
nuke13–70.0117%4 Sept →
inferno8–80.0126%4 Sept →
mirage16–140.0419%3 Sept →
ancient16–130.0616%2 Sept →
mirage13–50.1441%2 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0327%2 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0126%2 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0114%2 Sept →
mirage15–150.0522%31 Aug →
anubis13–100.1528%31 Aug →
anubis13–2-0.0116%31 Aug →
cache10–130.0331%29 Aug →
nuke13–90.0221%29 Aug →
dust213–90.0637%29 Aug →
inferno13–110.0820%29 Aug →
nuke13–90.1239%28 Aug →
inferno13–4-0.0318%28 Aug →
mirage8–130.0227%28 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0421%27 Aug →
nuke13–40.0027%27 Aug →
cache5–130.0223%27 Aug →
inferno13–80.0526%27 Aug →
ancient4–130.1424%27 Aug →
anubis10–130.0122%27 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0133%26 Aug →
nuke2–30.2227%26 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0436%26 Aug →
nuke13–100.0431%25 Aug →
inferno7–130.0224%25 Aug →
ancient7–00.1433%25 Aug →
cache2–130.0138%24 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0223%24 Aug →
mirage13–100.0122%24 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0026%24 Aug →
nuke13–20.1431%24 Aug →
anubis13–70.1736%23 Aug →
nuke12–160.0117%23 Aug →
inferno8–130.0133%23 Aug →
cache13–40.0635%23 Aug →
vertigo11–130.0230%23 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0328%23 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.