XXXMASTURBATOR

XXXMASTURBATOR — CS2 Stats

76561199559817428[U:1:1599551700]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

489Tracked matches50%Win rate2023Tracked since
351Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 20 days played since 30 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,993 +1,381 30 May17 Jun · 19 days played
9,77312,657peak 12,65730 May17 Jun
12,657Peak Premier in tracked matches
20Days played since 2026-05-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Performance scores

Aim47
Positioning35
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT55441Last 10055%Win rateWWLWWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −2.6pp headshot accuracy · −14ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 628ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 648ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim4.7
Utility5.1
Positioning3.5
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch0.4

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 689ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.7
Positioning3.5
Utility5.1
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time647ms+38ms
first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 647ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 9–5 · vertigo, 8 Jun
38%Best headshot accuracy · 8–0 · poseidon, 16 Jun
414msFastest reaction time · 9–2 · overpass, 30 May
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 8 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 67% over 6nukeWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA27161159%-0.03
infernoB21111052%0.00
anubisA116555%0.01
ancientA106460%-0.03
nukeC83538%-0.06
poseidonA74357%-0.04
vertigoS64267%0.03
overpassS64267%0.04
dust241325%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

14,331Lifetime kills
0.88K/D
1,108Matches
42.9%Match win rate
44.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
0.0%Shot accuracy
2,407MVPs
351Hours (in match)
1,754Bombs planted
247Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,858inferno
1,265dust2
865nuke
477vertigo
13office
1ar_shoots
1ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

10Matches
40%Win rate
0.82Avg K/D
63.5ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

22%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Cache2100%1.3812.0
Dust2250%1.0614.5
Mirage20%0.7613.0
Anubis10%0.357.0
Inferno1100%0.5910.0
Nuke10%0.436.0
Overpass10%0.417.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.2%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.6%Spray accuracy
81.0%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
689msReaction time
19.4%T opening success
41.3%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
2.3%Flash assists
8.56HE damage / grenade
4.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.1597% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.3521% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–11-0.0218%9 Jul
inferno9–6-0.019%9 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0516%17 Jun
inferno13–4-0.0520%16 Jun
poseidon8–00.1538%16 Jun
mirage13–20.0212%15 Jun
mirage13–80.0015%15 Jun
inferno5–90.0215%15 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0416%15 Jun
inferno5–90.0315%15 Jun
mirage14–160.0211%14 Jun
dust29–13-0.0612%14 Jun
mirage16–13-0.0613%14 Jun
poseidon7–90.0325%14 Jun
nuke9–3-0.1138%14 Jun
nuke5–9-0.0619%14 Jun
anubis13–110.0424%13 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0616%13 Jun
vertigo4–9-0.0410%13 Jun
inferno9–40.2030%13 Jun
ancient4–13-0.1213%12 Jun
poseidon9–40.0212%12 Jun
ancient5–13-0.1026%12 Jun
inferno3–13-0.046%12 Jun
dust28–13-0.0116%12 Jun
anubis10–13-0.059%12 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0617%11 Jun
anubis13–80.0415%11 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0412%11 Jun
anubis14–16-0.029%11 Jun
nuke2–9-0.288%11 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0210%10 Jun
ancient13–90.0225%10 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0319%10 Jun
overpass6–90.0214%10 Jun
nuke8–80.0414%10 Jun
dust26–13-0.0212%9 Jun
overpass13–90.029%9 Jun
inferno13–60.0312%9 Jun
overpass3–13-0.1211%9 Jun
mirage5–13-0.120%9 Jun
anubis10–130.0412%9 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0419%9 Jun
ancient13–60.0219%9 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0321%9 Jun
mirage13–70.015%8 Jun
mirage16–12-0.0511%8 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0022%8 Jun
anubis13–00.1212%8 Jun
anubis13–80.0617%8 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0115%8 Jun
vertigo9–50.2527%8 Jun
inferno0–9-0.1819%8 Jun
inferno2–90.0112%8 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0619%7 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0510%7 Jun
inferno13–10-0.059%7 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0121%7 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0319%7 Jun
inferno13–110.0124%7 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0523%7 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0520%6 Jun
nuke13–160.0125%6 Jun
mirage11–130.0016%5 Jun
inferno13–60.0720%5 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0318%5 Jun
vertigo9–7-0.0910%5 Jun
dust213–80.0318%4 Jun
mirage16–14-0.0020%4 Jun
poseidon5–9-0.2321%4 Jun
poseidon9–5-0.0321%4 Jun
poseidon2–9-0.195%4 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0324%4 Jun
poseidon9–3-0.0122%4 Jun
mirage2–13-0.124%3 Jun
anubis16–14-0.0216%3 Jun
inferno13–60.0414%3 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0129%3 Jun
mirage5–130.0118%3 Jun
ancient13–6-0.039%3 Jun
inferno13–70.0523%2 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0215%2 Jun
mirage7–13-0.068%2 Jun
vertigo9–70.0227%2 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0423%1 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0021%1 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0318%1 Jun
vertigo9–40.0726%1 Jun
overpass9–30.2222%31 May
mirage7–130.0018%31 May
nuke13–10-0.0113%31 May
anubis3–13-0.0421%31 May
mirage16–14-0.0213%31 May
ancient11–00.0514%31 May
inferno6–13-0.0611%30 May
mirage13–6-0.0316%30 May
overpass13–10-0.0211%30 May
inferno9–00.167%30 May
vertigo3–9-0.0313%30 May
overpass9–20.1017%30 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →