ИЛЬЯ

ИЛЬЯ — CS2 Stats

BQ76561199548754629[U:1:1588488901]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,469Tracked matches50%Win rate2024Tracked since
2,135Hours in CS40Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,749 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Sep 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,749 → 1,749
+26Tracked matches · now 1,469
0.0ppWin rate · 50.0% → 50.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 78 days played since 8 Mar 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,601 +4,571 8 Mar28 Jun · 9 days played
6,52018,601peak 18,6018 Mar28 Jun
Faceit ELO: 1,749 +0 1 Sept6 Sept · 3 observations
1,7491,749peak 1,7491 Sept6 Sept
18,601Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,749Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
78Days played since 2025-03-08

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,749
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 2 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,915), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate50.2%48.3%51.0%meets
Shot accuracy0.0%13.2%13.7%13.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.781.071.090.30 short
Match win rate48.3%46.9%48.4%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGИЛЬЯFACEITLevel 9 · 1,749 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,749csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning57
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48448Last 10048%Win rateLLWLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +1.1pp headshot accuracy · −72ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 659ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility4.3
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 645ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning5.7
Utility4.3
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time669ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 676ms → last ⅓ avg 669ms
Headshot accuracy23.6%+7.8%
first ⅓ avg 15.7% → last ⅓ avg 23.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 12–12 · nuke, 18 Mar
100%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · mirage, 5 Dec
31msFastest reaction time · 8–0 · dust2, 5 Dec
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 5 Dec

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
80In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA1710759%0.01
dust2B179853%-0.00
nukeC167944%0.02
ancientD134931%0.00
infernoD113827%-0.05
anubisB84450%0.01
overpassS54180%0.03
vertigo42250%0.02
train43175%0.02
poseidon21150%0.04
cache1010%-0.04
sanctum1010%-0.08
edin110100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

62,928Lifetime kills
0.78K/D
3,103Matches
48.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
50.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
8,374MVPs
1,931Hours (in match)
3,138Bombs planted
759Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,372
AWP3,089
MP92,398
MAC-101,582
Knife1,237

Lifetime map wins

4,337dust2
4,219nuke
3,034inferno
1,170train
383vertigo
80italy
80office
12ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,448Matches
54%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
79.7ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
19Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage40452%0.9514.3
Nuke21662%1.1316.4
Anubis21150%1.0715.6
Dust221053%1.1916.5
Ancient19449%1.0615.7
Inferno7658%1.1316.5
Train5655%1.1416.3
Cache4151%1.2116.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.0%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.8%Spray accuracy
84.2%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
645msReaction time
36.7%T opening success
56.2%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
8.43HE damage / grenade
6.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4068 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.719% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0322%29 Aug
cache7–13-0.0430%29 Aug
anubis13–70.0422%27 Aug
vertigo10–130.1121%25 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0121%24 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0726%22 Aug
mirage0–13-0.069%22 Aug
nuke1–100.0734%21 Aug
nuke16–130.0421%21 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0136%19 Aug
train2–130.0316%13 Aug
dust26–00.0729%12 Jul
dust213–100.0229%28 Jun
train13–40.0233%18 Jun
anubis13–50.0735%14 Jun
overpass13–90.0120%4 Jun
nuke13–80.1023%4 Jun
poseidon3–90.0119%29 May
nuke6–9-0.0311%29 May
ancient6–13-0.0418%16 May
mirage8–130.0722%13 May
ancient13–40.1029%6 May
inferno13–110.0419%2 May
mirage12–120.0522%14 Apr
sanctum4–9-0.0824%13 Apr
poseidon9–70.0715%13 Apr
inferno13–16-0.0115%12 Apr
mirage16–140.0730%9 Apr
mirage13–60.0616%8 Apr
nuke9–50.0213%30 Mar
dust25–13-0.0317%30 Mar
dust20–6-0.0640%30 Mar
ancient6–130.0441%30 Mar
nuke2–9-0.0314%19 Mar
nuke12–120.1420%18 Mar
overpass13–90.0324%13 Mar
mirage3–13-0.0321%11 Mar
anubis13–80.0224%6 Mar
dust212–12-0.0414%28 Feb
ancient12–120.0314%24 Feb
nuke13–80.0816%23 Feb
ancient5–130.0718%16 Feb
nuke8–130.0127%6 Feb
anubis9–130.0321%4 Feb
overpass13–70.0628%20 Jan
dust212–120.0215%2 Jan
dust23–13-0.070%2 Jan
vertigo13–90.0318%17 Dec
vertigo13–110.0423%17 Dec
overpass3–00.0650%5 Dec
train3–00.0250%5 Dec
dust28–00.0160%5 Dec
mirage3–130.0082%5 Dec
mirage13–00.0388%5 Dec
mirage13–10.06100%5 Dec
mirage13–8-0.088%4 Dec
ancient13–6-0.0118%3 Dec
vertigo2–9-0.0815%15 Nov
nuke12–12-0.0319%13 Nov
anubis8–13-0.0211%12 Nov
dust213–50.0621%29 Oct
dust213–100.0019%29 Oct
ancient5–13-0.066%17 Oct
anubis10–130.0616%15 Oct
overpass9–13-0.0112%8 Oct
inferno3–9-0.0620%7 Oct
anubis12–12-0.0811%5 Oct
dust213–30.0925%1 Oct
dust213–11-0.0117%12 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0414%8 Sept
dust28–13-0.0530%7 Sept
dust24–13-0.053%31 Aug
dust213–7-0.0317%29 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0211%21 Aug
nuke13–160.0213%20 Aug
nuke8–80.0311%26 Jul
ancient10–130.0012%25 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0216%25 Jul
train13–80.0221%16 Jul
mirage16–140.0316%5 Jul
ancient8–13-0.075%5 Jul
ancient13–60.026%3 Jul
dust213–7-0.0211%1 Jul
anubis13–2-0.0711%27 Jun
mirage13–40.0627%27 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0117%11 Jun
mirage13–110.0217%28 May
inferno6–9-0.0821%7 May
inferno1–9-0.1538%7 May
edin13–90.1020%30 Apr
mirage8–13-0.046%30 Apr
ancient13–80.0916%28 Apr
nuke9–10.0729%17 Apr
inferno13–5-0.059%16 Apr
inferno9–30.0817%15 Apr
inferno2–9-0.1710%13 Apr
inferno1–9-0.115%12 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0722%24 Mar
dust26–13-0.0112%11 Mar
nuke4–13-0.0714%8 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →