FkN | Dingle Berry

FkN | Dingle Berry — CS2 Stats

BW76561199542655695[U:1:1582389967]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,107Tracked matches48%Win rate2023Tracked since
4,561Hours in CS36Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating5,000Light Blue band · top ~78.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+1120Premier CS Rating · 3,880 → 5,000
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 17 days played since 29 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 5,000 -830 29 Aug20 Sept · 17 days played
3,8806,640peak 6,64029 Aug20 Sept
6,673Peak Premier in tracked matches
17Days played since 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,640 below peak (6,640)
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches3013+17
Win rate53%69%−16pp
K/D1.041.10−0.06
Headshot %40%41%−1pp

Measured 12 Sep 202620 Sep 2026; previous 7 Sep 2026 → 12 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,847), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate38.9%42.7%43.8%4.9% short
Shot accuracy0.6%11.3%12.0%11.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.850.991.020.17 short
Match win rate42.8%43.9%44.7%1.9% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 5 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFkN | Dingle BerryFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER5,000 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning46
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49492Last 10049%Win rateLWWWWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −2.8pp headshot accuracy · −29ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 644ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 665ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 679ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim5.0
Utility4.6
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.0
Clutch1.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 48% on T to 31% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 680ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning4.6
Utility4.6
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time674ms+53ms
first ⅓ avg 621ms → last ⅓ avg 674ms
Headshot accuracy13.4%−2.6%
first ⅓ avg 16.0% → last ⅓ avg 13.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 12 Sept
67%Best headshot accuracy · 5–11 · mirage, 6 Sept
469msFastest reaction time · 1–6 · nuke, 3 Sept
13–0Biggest win · cache, 6 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
69In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 8infernoWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B28141450%0.01
mirageB23111248%0.00
nukeB2091145%0.01
ancientA127558%-0.01
cacheS86275%-0.00
infernoD62433%-0.02
anubis3030%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

66,013Lifetime kills
0.85K/D
4,165Matches
42.8%Match win rate
38.9%Headshot %
0.6%Shot accuracy
7,898MVPs
1,764Hours (in match)
3,951Bombs planted
1,175Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4717,703
AWP10,063
MAC-104,826
P903,199
MP92,028
SSG 081,858
MP71,531

Lifetime map wins

8,101dust2
7,647nuke
4,863inferno
2,581vertigo
685train
16lake
15italy
14ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

18Matches
44%Win rate
0.71Avg K/D
68.3ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2650%0.468.0
Mirage425%0.7913.5
Inferno450%0.6611.8
Nuke250%1.2414.0
Ancient10%0.6012.0
Anubis1100%1.2018.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.5%Headshot accuracy
37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.5%Spray accuracy
77.3%Counter-strafing
12.5°Preaim
680msReaction time
47.9%T opening success
31.0%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
7.98HE damage / grenade
5.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.5234° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.4607% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–13-0.013%20 Sept
nuke13–3-0.0013%20 Sept
nuke13–70.018%20 Sept
dust216–120.0224%20 Sept
cache13–30.0814%20 Sept
cache13–11-0.0115%20 Sept
dust26–130.0120%20 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0111%19 Sept
inferno5–13-0.145%19 Sept
mirage13–70.0211%19 Sept
dust213–30.0425%19 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0117%19 Sept
mirage9–13-0.017%18 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0211%14 Sept
dust25–130.0415%14 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0810%14 Sept
cache8–130.0312%14 Sept
mirage13–1-0.0216%14 Sept
dust27–13-0.0319%13 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0221%13 Sept
cache3–13-0.132%13 Sept
mirage15–150.0017%12 Sept
cache13–7-0.0519%12 Sept
dust29–13-0.0015%12 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0212%12 Sept
nuke13–20.136%12 Sept
anubis9–130.0112%12 Sept
nuke13–30.0411%12 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0213%12 Sept
dust213–6-0.0114%12 Sept
ancient13–90.027%12 Sept
inferno13–50.1315%12 Sept
nuke3–13-0.0423%12 Sept
nuke9–130.0216%12 Sept
cache13–30.0122%12 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0621%12 Sept
nuke7–130.0332%8 Sept
ancient13–90.0612%8 Sept
mirage13–30.0418%8 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0413%8 Sept
mirage13–80.0516%8 Sept
inferno13–6-0.0112%7 Sept
mirage13–100.0212%7 Sept
nuke13–8-0.0317%7 Sept
mirage11–130.0213%7 Sept
nuke10–130.0314%7 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0215%7 Sept
mirage11–13-0.058%7 Sept
dust210–130.0017%7 Sept
dust28–00.0830%7 Sept
mirage13–40.0018%7 Sept
anubis11–130.0315%6 Sept
dust213–8-0.0414%6 Sept
mirage5–11-0.0867%6 Sept
dust25–130.0232%6 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0329%6 Sept
nuke13–70.136%6 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0020%6 Sept
cache13–00.0628%6 Sept
mirage11–130.0824%5 Sept
mirage11–130.0312%5 Sept
dust210–13-0.0311%5 Sept
dust26–130.0416%5 Sept
dust213–110.0423%5 Sept
mirage16–130.0811%5 Sept
ancient13–60.0716%5 Sept
dust24–130.0519%5 Sept
nuke9–130.0410%5 Sept
dust213–70.048%4 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0111%4 Sept
dust213–11-0.0122%4 Sept
nuke1–6-0.020%3 Sept
nuke2–13-0.0621%3 Sept
nuke13–100.0511%3 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0113%2 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0511%1 Sept
dust210–130.0115%1 Sept
dust213–40.0511%1 Sept
dust25–20.0067%1 Sept
nuke13–160.0215%31 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0210%31 Aug
dust24–13-0.0315%31 Aug
cache13–10-0.017%31 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0312%31 Aug
dust213–110.0012%30 Aug
dust210–130.0429%30 Aug
ancient7–130.0113%30 Aug
ancient13–60.0110%30 Aug
ancient8–13-0.1020%30 Aug
dust213–9-0.0215%30 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0316%30 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0320%30 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0212%30 Aug
ancient13–40.019%30 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0811%30 Aug
ancient15–150.0119%30 Aug
mirage13–70.0514%29 Aug
dust213–80.0615%29 Aug
dust213–100.0217%29 Aug
dust24–130.0140%29 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →