揚げたカエルの脚

揚げたカエルの脚 — CS2 Stats

JP76561199541753497[U:1:1581487769]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

652Tracked matches48%Win rate2024Tracked since
652Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,213 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 54 days played since 11 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,842 +6,301 11 Jan29 Jun · 26 days played
7,54115,686peak 15,68611 Jan29 Jun
15,736Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,213Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
54Days played since 2026-01-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,213
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 138 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,302), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate52.5%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy0.0%12.7%13.0%13.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.851.051.060.21 short
Match win rate44.8%45.7%46.3%1.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG揚げたカエルの脚FACEITLevel 7 · 1,213 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,213csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning44
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY454510Last 10045%Win rateWWLWTWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +1.9pp headshot accuracy · +23ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 806ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 709ms

Last 20

  • 7103 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 697ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility4.6
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch1.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 677ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning4.4
Utility4.6
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time669ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 680ms → last ⅓ avg 669ms
Headshot accuracy25.4%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 24.9% → last ⅓ avg 25.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 10 Sept
62%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · overpass, 29 Jun
375msFastest reaction time · 8–8 · inferno, 24 Feb
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 11 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
84In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 16mirageWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB22101245%0.02
nukeC1971237%0.01
ancientA1610663%-0.00
mirageD1551033%0.00
anubisB115645%0.02
dust2B115645%-0.01
overpass31233%-0.03
cache1010%-0.05
vertigo110100%-0.11
rooftop110100%0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

16,153Lifetime kills
0.85K/D
997Matches
44.8%Match win rate
52.5%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
2,219MVPs
435Hours (in match)
747Bombs planted
180Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,717inferno
1,458nuke
1,326dust2
280vertigo
253train
1ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

156Matches
55%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
70.9ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

28%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4461%0.9715.3
Ancient2959%1.1016.1
Inferno2548%0.8314.1
Dust22467%0.9714.5
Nuke1527%0.7311.3
Anubis862%1.2616.0
Overpass838%0.8014.3
Train367%0.7612.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.1%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.3%Spray accuracy
83.0%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
677msReaction time
38.9%T opening success
31.4%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
10.0%Flash assists
6.89HE damage / grenade
4.71Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.8838% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–100.0326%16 Sept
nuke13–60.0635%15 Sept
dust25–13-0.0322%15 Sept
nuke13–50.0642%14 Sept
nuke8–80.0138%10 Sept
inferno9–30.1724%10 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0327%10 Sept
nuke8–130.0226%9 Sept
inferno9–130.0223%9 Sept
inferno9–70.1031%9 Sept
inferno8–80.0228%9 Sept
cache10–13-0.0516%9 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0222%13 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0924%13 Aug
overpass10–13-0.0462%29 Jun
anubis11–130.0222%29 Jun
ancient13–70.0626%29 Jun
mirage15–150.0228%16 Jun
anubis7–130.0233%16 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0714%15 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0130%12 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0519%8 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0220%31 May
dust29–13-0.0317%31 May
mirage7–130.0131%31 May
mirage13–5-0.0226%26 May
ancient13–50.0014%26 May
ancient13–8-0.0017%25 May
inferno7–9-0.0225%25 May
vertigo9–4-0.1116%25 May
inferno7–130.0127%21 May
inferno13–100.0211%20 May
ancient13–10-0.0120%20 May
anubis6–1-0.035%20 May
ancient13–5-0.0322%18 May
inferno13–5-0.0335%18 May
ancient5–130.0512%18 May
nuke1–6-0.1233%15 May
mirage3–13-0.0024%13 May
ancient13–11-0.0215%13 May
mirage6–13-0.0124%11 May
inferno13–50.0115%11 May
mirage13–20.0829%11 May
inferno9–10.124%11 May
inferno8–80.0122%10 May
nuke8–80.0424%10 May
mirage6–130.0523%10 May
anubis3–13-0.0536%10 May
nuke13–100.0718%30 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0314%25 Apr
dust28–13-0.0826%25 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0337%7 Apr
dust213–16-0.0620%6 Apr
ancient13–100.0119%30 Mar
inferno15–15-0.0931%30 Mar
ancient13–70.0128%26 Mar
dust213–6-0.0814%23 Mar
inferno6–9-0.0935%16 Mar
mirage13–70.0216%15 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0024%2 Mar
dust29–130.0124%1 Mar
overpass14–16-0.0413%26 Feb
mirage7–13-0.056%26 Feb
nuke13–160.0425%24 Feb
nuke6–13-0.0631%24 Feb
inferno8–80.1229%24 Feb
nuke9–3-0.0126%23 Feb
nuke6–13-0.0430%22 Feb
dust29–130.0422%19 Feb
ancient10–130.0223%17 Feb
inferno15–150.0428%17 Feb
ancient13–50.0339%16 Feb
dust213–50.0232%15 Feb
dust213–80.0431%15 Feb
dust213–40.0929%15 Feb
anubis13–60.0123%12 Feb
inferno8–130.0338%10 Feb
anubis13–90.0329%10 Feb
nuke4–130.0224%9 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0029%9 Feb
inferno1–12-0.029%8 Feb
mirage13–110.0823%3 Feb
nuke6–130.0423%3 Feb
anubis10–130.0716%2 Feb
dust213–90.0223%1 Feb
mirage13–7-0.0121%1 Feb
nuke8–80.0316%1 Feb
nuke13–40.0531%28 Jan
overpass13–11-0.0216%28 Jan
inferno13–11-0.0318%25 Jan
anubis9–13-0.0418%22 Jan
anubis13–90.0623%20 Jan
inferno9–40.0411%20 Jan
rooftop9–50.1630%20 Jan
inferno9–70.0819%20 Jan
anubis1–60.0638%20 Jan
inferno12–12-0.0229%15 Jan
nuke2–13-0.0638%12 Jan
ancient6–130.0124%11 Jan
nuke14–16-0.0021%11 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →