uhhh?

uhhh? — CS2 Stats

76561198273055177[U:1:312789449]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

193Tracked matches36%Win rate2024Tracked since
791Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating2.9 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating8,059Light Blue band · top ~64.2% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 56 days played since 2 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 8,059 -466 18 Dec15 Sept · 31 days played
6,46610,104peak 10,10418 Dec15 Sept
10,104Peak Premier in tracked matches
56Days played since 2025-12-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,045 below peak (10,104)
  • +541 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 1,941 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Light Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=8,059), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLight Blue band medianBlue band medianvs Blue band
Headshot rate44.2%39.9%41.9%above
Shot accuracy0.5%6.8%9.6%9.1% short
Kill/death ratio0.740.910.980.24 short
Match win rate36.1%42.3%43.8%7.7% short

This profile matches the typical Blue band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGuhhh?PREMIER8,059 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim39
Positioning51
Utility25

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD35614Last 10035%Win rateWLLLLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.1pp headshot accuracy · −33ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim3.9
Utility2.5
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels1.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 561ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.9
Positioning5.1
Utility2.5
Mechanics3.5
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact0.2

Composite 2.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time576ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy15.7%−2.5%
first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 15.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 11–13 · inferno, 25 Feb
45%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · nuke, 22 Dec
422msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · nuke, 15 Sept
13–1Biggest win · stronghold, 7 Feb

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
73In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 58% over 12mirageWeakest map · 11% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB28141450%-0.00
mirageD1921711%-0.02
infernoD1531220%-0.01
ancientD1441029%-0.04
anubisA127558%-0.02
overpass42250%0.00
vertigo21150%-0.04
dust22020%-0.05
shelter1010%-0.07
cache110100%0.00
stronghold110100%0.06
train1010%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

11,619Lifetime kills
0.74K/D
868Matches
36.1%Match win rate
44.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Light Blue band
0.5%Shot accuracy
1,324MVPs
306Hours (in match)
937Bombs planted
140Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,527nuke
946inferno
688vertigo
377dust2
113train
25cbble
2office
2ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.9%Headshot accuracy
26.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.9%Spray accuracy
65.8%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
561msReaction time
35.9%T opening success
30.5%CT opening success
0.33Enemies flashed / flash
0.6%Flash assists
8.87HE damage / grenade
3.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3254 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.9165% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–60.0217%15 Sept
shelter2–13-0.0719%11 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0714%10 Sept
nuke8–130.0114%9 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0616%9 Sept
nuke13–80.0226%2 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0514%1 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0314%31 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0516%30 Aug
nuke3–13-0.016%30 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0218%25 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0126%24 Aug
vertigo0–13-0.0510%24 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0315%18 Aug
nuke13–60.0233%17 Aug
ancient13–10-0.079%17 Aug
cache13–90.0012%17 Aug
nuke13–100.0321%16 Aug
nuke13–80.0210%9 Aug
anubis9–130.0114%9 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0312%7 Aug
ancient4–13-0.1122%7 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0010%2 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0222%30 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0216%30 Jul
inferno15–150.0120%30 Jul
nuke4–13-0.129%19 Jul
mirage2–13-0.040%15 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0614%15 Jul
inferno12–120.0219%27 Apr
ancient16–13-0.0013%27 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0416%25 Apr
dust28–13-0.0722%25 Apr
anubis13–70.0818%6 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0227%14 Mar
mirage1–5-0.0112%25 Feb
inferno11–130.0912%25 Feb
nuke13–16-0.0420%24 Feb
nuke6–13-0.0315%24 Feb
dust29–13-0.0412%19 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0320%17 Feb
inferno15–150.0121%17 Feb
inferno13–70.0115%11 Feb
ancient13–60.076%11 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0812%11 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0729%9 Feb
nuke16–14-0.0125%8 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0519%7 Feb
stronghold13–10.0615%7 Feb
nuke5–130.000%7 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0725%6 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0118%6 Feb
nuke13–10-0.0320%6 Feb
inferno10–13-0.0315%6 Feb
mirage13–110.0511%3 Feb
nuke6–130.0313%3 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0217%2 Feb
anubis13–9-0.029%20 Jan
anubis1–6-0.0514%20 Jan
inferno4–13-0.0726%18 Jan
nuke2–130.065%12 Jan
train10–130.0014%11 Jan
inferno8–13-0.0318%11 Jan
nuke13–100.0521%11 Jan
mirage4–13-0.0318%11 Jan
ancient16–130.0313%11 Jan
inferno13–10-0.0132%8 Jan
nuke13–5-0.018%8 Jan
overpass13–4-0.0221%8 Jan
nuke13–8-0.0114%7 Jan
overpass13–110.0019%6 Jan
nuke8–13-0.0110%6 Jan
inferno2–13-0.0613%6 Jan
mirage4–13-0.0618%3 Jan
mirage10–130.0523%3 Jan
nuke6–00.0515%2 Jan
ancient3–13-0.0720%26 Dec
overpass9–130.0311%22 Dec
anubis7–13-0.0511%22 Dec
nuke13–3-0.0145%22 Dec
nuke5–13-0.0119%21 Dec
ancient4–13-0.1126%21 Dec
ancient7–13-0.0016%20 Dec
nuke13–20.0616%20 Dec
nuke7–13-0.0814%20 Dec
inferno5–130.0120%19 Dec
mirage5–130.0312%19 Dec
nuke11–13-0.0233%19 Dec
ancient15–15-0.0225%18 Dec
nuke13–110.0613%18 Dec
overpass9–130.0020%17 Dec
inferno13–20.029%15 Dec
vertigo13–4-0.0322%15 Dec
mirage13–110.0314%15 Dec
anubis13–9-0.0428%15 Dec
ancient5–13-0.0720%13 Dec
mirage2–13-0.0315%9 Dec
nuke7–13-0.047%8 Dec
anubis13–80.0221%6 Dec
mirage8–130.0124%2 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →