GermanBOT

GermanBOT — CS2 Stats

NF76561199538407691[U:1:1578141963]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,158Tracked matches55%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,392Hours in CS15Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.5 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,189Top 50% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#68251 of 261569 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,772 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Nov 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,189 +573 15 Jul – 12 Nov · 37 days played
18,98423,737peak 23,73715 Jul12 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,772 +0 30 Aug – 6 Nov · 5 observations
1,7721,772peak 1,77230 Aug6 Nov
23,737Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,772Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-07-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,772
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 229 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,548 below peak (23,737)
  • -1,899 over 30 days · declining
  • +1,190 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,811 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-08
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches14——
Win rate21%——
K/D1.07——
Headshot %44%——

Measured 6 Nov 2026 → 14 Nov 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate48.3%46.8%48.2%meets
Shot accuracy0.7%13.0%13.2%12.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.021.061.070.05 short
Match win rate50.2%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGermanBOTFACEITLevel 8 · 1,772 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER21,189 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,772csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93
Positioning69
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–43–1Last 10056%Win rateLLLLLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +4.8pp headshot accuracy · −48ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 456ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 481ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim9.3
Utility4.5
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels4.7
Clutch2.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 65% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 65% on T to 49% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3
Positioning6.9
Utility4.5
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels6.7
Win Impact6.7

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time513ms−112ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 513ms
Headshot accuracy24.5%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 23.9% → last ⅓ avg 24.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 13–1 · dust2, 16 Sept →
52%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · dust2, 3 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · mirage, 30 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 8 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L5Current streak
9–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 65% over 34anubisWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3519–1654%0.02
dust2S3422–1265%0.02
ancientA106–460%0.02
anubisD92–722%0.03
nukeA74–357%0.00
cache—31–233%0.02
inferno—22–0100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

33,892Lifetime kills
1.02K/D
1,638Matches
50.2%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
48.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
0.7%Shot accuracy
3,908MVPs
903Hours (in match)
1,589Bombs planted
396Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,114dust2
924inferno
846nuke
124train
105vertigo
15office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

697Matches
51%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
79.9ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage23847%1.0815.9
Dust213548%1.1015.1
Anubis11759%1.1316.4
Ancient8747%1.0616.1
Inferno3754%1.0115.2
Nuke2959%1.0616.3
Vertigo743%0.8513.3
Overpass475%1.3515.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.7%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
84.6%Counter-strafing
6.6°Preaim
501msReaction time
64.9%T opening success
48.8%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
10.1%Flash assists
6.99HE damage / grenade
5.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis5–13-0.0250%12 Nov →
dust25–13-0.0418%12 Nov →
nuke5–13-0.0136%12 Nov →
anubis7–130.0919%12 Nov →
cache5–130.0842%9 Nov →
ancient13–40.0619%8 Nov →
mirage5–13-0.0320%8 Nov →
mirage8–10.1936%3 Nov →
dust213–60.0323%3 Nov →
mirage8–30.1025%2 Nov →
dust213–10-0.0631%2 Nov →
mirage2–13-0.0613%2 Nov →
ancient13–80.0447%2 Nov →
nuke7–13-0.0517%24 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0818%23 Oct →
anubis3–130.0227%23 Oct →
mirage13–70.0519%17 Oct →
dust213–50.1117%15 Oct →
ancient15–150.0626%11 Oct →
anubis13–20.0424%11 Oct →
dust213–00.0910%8 Oct →
inferno13–70.0013%3 Oct →
dust213–110.0732%2 Oct →
anubis6–130.0828%2 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0332%2 Oct →
mirage13–80.0720%30 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0142%30 Sept →
ancient13–30.0010%30 Sept →
ancient13–50.0029%29 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0617%28 Sept →
dust20–13-0.088%28 Sept →
dust213–00.1125%28 Sept →
mirage14–160.0618%25 Sept →
nuke13–120.0229%25 Sept →
mirage13–50.1448%23 Sept →
cache6–130.0013%23 Sept →
dust213–90.0223%21 Sept →
ancient7–130.0019%21 Sept →
dust213–30.0421%19 Sept →
mirage13–90.0513%19 Sept →
dust216–130.0527%19 Sept →
mirage13–1-0.0529%19 Sept →
mirage10–130.0520%19 Sept →
ancient13–90.0542%18 Sept →
dust214–160.0116%18 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0114%18 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0333%18 Sept →
dust213–80.0131%18 Sept →
dust216–140.0121%18 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0223%18 Sept →
anubis13–70.0113%18 Sept →
mirage7–00.0233%17 Sept →
mirage13–70.0229%17 Sept →
dust213–10.2434%16 Sept →
mirage13–110.0527%16 Sept →
dust216–140.0331%16 Sept →
mirage16–140.0135%16 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0315%10 Sept →
mirage14–160.0723%9 Sept →
dust211–130.0926%9 Sept →
dust211–130.0623%8 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0216%8 Sept →
mirage5–130.0218%8 Sept →
mirage13–40.0212%8 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0425%7 Sept →
dust27–130.0125%7 Sept →
nuke13–100.0517%7 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0132%7 Sept →
dust213–80.0323%7 Sept →
ancient16–140.0327%7 Sept →
dust213–110.0352%3 Sept →
mirage13–70.0224%2 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0736%1 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0022%30 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0819%19 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0323%5 Aug →
mirage0–130.0133%5 Aug →
dust29–130.0017%4 Aug →
mirage6–130.0322%4 Aug →
dust211–130.0025%4 Aug →
mirage5–130.0136%28 Jul →
nuke1–13-0.0424%27 Jul →
anubis10–130.0410%27 Jul →
ancient2–13-0.0016%27 Jul →
dust213–90.0524%27 Jul →
dust213–100.0938%27 Jul →
dust216–130.1029%27 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0318%22 Jul →
dust213–70.0516%22 Jul →
nuke13–100.0515%16 Jul →
dust213–100.0111%15 Jul →
dust23–13-0.078%15 Jul →
nuke13–60.0131%15 Jul →
mirage13–90.0321%15 Jul →
anubis4–130.0322%15 Jul →
inferno13–80.0017%13 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0322%13 Jul →
mirage13–20.0623%13 Jul →
mirage13–100.0636%12 Jul →
mirage13–80.0118%12 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.