mgT

mgT — CS2 Stats

SK76561199536611171[U:1:1576345443]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

437Tracked matches59%Win rate2025Tracked since
1,333Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,290Top 50% of 211,308 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#65784 of 258349 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 958 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,290 +7,962 13 Jun – 24 Oct · 34 days played
12,38121,290peak 21,29013 Jun24 Oct
Faceit ELO: 958 +0 31 Aug – 19 Sept · 5 observations
958958peak 95831 Aug19 Sept
21,290Peak Premier in tracked matches
958Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
50Days played since 2026-06-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 958
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 93 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 21,290
  • +1,220 over 30 days · improving
  • +6,342 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,710 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-14
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches2028−8
Win rate45%46%−1pp
K/D0.860.90−0.03
Headshot %40%37%+3pp

Measured 25 Sep 2026 → 29 Oct 2026; previous 31 Aug 2026 → 25 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate43.4%44.8%45.7%2.3% short
Shot accuracy0.0%12.4%12.7%12.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.881.031.050.17 short
Match win rate48.8%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmgTFACEITLevel 6 · 958 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER21,290 · Pink bandPEAK ELO958csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning67
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–38–6Last 10056%Win rateLWLWLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +2.0pp headshot accuracy · +67ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility4.2
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels5.5
Clutch2.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.7
Utility4.2
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time536ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 566ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 22.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.30Best match rating · 9–0 · eldorado, 5 Aug →
57%Best headshot accuracy · 9–6 · inferno, 21 Jun →
352msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · ancient, 20 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 26 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 91% over 11cacheWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2311–1248%0.01
ancientS1711–665%0.02
dust2C166–1038%-0.00
mirageS1110–191%0.01
cacheC114–736%-0.01
anubisA85–363%0.01
eldoradoS65–183%0.08
nukeS54–180%0.03
vertigo—20–20%-0.06
overpass—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

22,965Lifetime kills
0.88K/D
1,977Matches
48.8%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 6 players
43.4%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
4,863MVPs
615Hours (in match)
1,418Bombs planted
408Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,829inferno
2,708dust2
1,864vertigo
1,379nuke
78train
19lake
4cbble
1ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

176Matches
49%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
81.5ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient5351%1.2017.6
Mirage3459%1.0014.6
Dust23050%1.2016.5
Nuke2055%0.8415.3
Cache1553%1.1316.7
Anubis1225%0.8314.7
Inferno812%0.7313.0
Overpass30%0.7312.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.9%Spray accuracy
80.4%Counter-strafing
6.6°Preaim
523msReaction time
38.2%T opening success
59.2%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
9.9%Flash assists
6.65HE damage / grenade
3.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4349 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.1868% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo7–9-0.1229%26 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0615%24 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.024%24 Oct →
mirage13–80.026%24 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0137%12 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0727%8 Oct →
ancient13–110.0224%6 Oct →
nuke13–80.0122%6 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0920%22 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0738%16 Sept →
cache9–130.019%16 Sept →
ancient12–16-0.0122%16 Sept →
ancient9–130.0032%15 Sept →
cache13–10-0.018%15 Sept →
anubis13–80.0435%14 Sept →
cache13–100.025%13 Sept →
mirage13–70.0221%13 Sept →
cache15–15-0.0329%11 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0115%8 Sept →
dust213–90.0227%3 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0222%2 Sept →
ancient13–90.0316%1 Sept →
mirage13–30.0020%27 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0315%27 Aug →
inferno13–90.0310%26 Aug →
ancient13–110.0426%26 Aug →
nuke13–00.1331%26 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0130%25 Aug →
mirage13–00.1043%24 Aug →
inferno6–130.0620%22 Aug →
mirage13–50.0015%19 Aug →
cache13–40.0710%18 Aug →
inferno13–70.0516%17 Aug →
mirage13–100.0121%17 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0523%17 Aug →
cache13–70.059%16 Aug →
ancient13–110.1129%14 Aug →
mirage13–60.0321%12 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0319%10 Aug →
eldorado9–00.3033%5 Aug →
inferno8–80.0623%2 Aug →
eldorado5–9-0.226%2 Aug →
nuke13–10.0630%2 Aug →
anubis13–70.0121%2 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0044%1 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0425%1 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0623%1 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0619%1 Aug →
anubis13–70.0219%22 Jul →
mirage13–2-0.0332%21 Jul →
dust213–100.0022%21 Jul →
eldorado9–70.0511%21 Jul →
ancient13–100.0226%20 Jul →
dust213–80.2433%20 Jul →
dust212–120.0710%19 Jul →
dust213–20.0632%19 Jul →
eldorado9–30.2410%18 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0410%16 Jul →
mirage13–60.0927%16 Jul →
ancient13–5-0.0126%16 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0720%11 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0632%11 Jul →
ancient13–20.1233%11 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.0216%9 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0221%9 Jul →
eldorado9–60.0928%9 Jul →
eldorado9–50.0220%9 Jul →
inferno4–130.0317%5 Jul →
nuke13–8-0.0125%5 Jul →
ancient13–10.0726%4 Jul →
anubis8–130.0123%3 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.008%1 Jul →
ancient13–90.0311%22 Jun →
ancient15–150.0522%22 Jun →
inferno8–13-0.0314%22 Jun →
inferno4–9-0.0831%21 Jun →
inferno7–90.0225%21 Jun →
inferno9–60.0733%21 Jun →
inferno5–9-0.0350%21 Jun →
inferno9–5-0.0210%21 Jun →
inferno9–70.1012%21 Jun →
inferno8–8-0.0725%21 Jun →
inferno4–9-0.1518%21 Jun →
inferno9–6-0.0338%21 Jun →
inferno9–20.0733%21 Jun →
inferno3–9-0.1025%21 Jun →
inferno8–80.0316%21 Jun →
vertigo7–90.0130%21 Jun →
inferno9–6-0.0057%21 Jun →
inferno9–60.0618%20 Jun →
inferno9–10.2622%20 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.0119%18 Jun →
overpass11–13-0.0318%17 Jun →
nuke5–13-0.0229%16 Jun →
anubis13–50.008%16 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0013%15 Jun →
inferno13–70.0120%15 Jun →
dust216–120.0236%15 Jun →
dust23–13-0.0911%13 Jun →
ancient7–130.0315%13 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.