FlacoFalsely

FlacoFalsely — CS2 Stats

YE76561199525574309[U:1:1565308581]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

855Tracked matches59%Win rate2025Tracked since
2,032Hours in CS25Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,350Top 25% of 205,052 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#38298 of 252235 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,453 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (31 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,350 +3,500 14 Jun – 15 Sept · 16 days played
17,71723,692peak 23,69214 Jun15 Sept
23,806Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,453Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-06-14

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,453
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 78 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier CS Rating

  • 342 below peak (23,692)
  • +286 over 30 days · steady
  • +4,842 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,650 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches68——
Win rate59%——
K/D0.88——
Headshot %59%——

Measured 17 Sep 2026 → 16 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,153), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate58.9%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy0.0%12.4%12.7%12.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.041.031.05meets
Match win rate47.3%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFlacoFalselyFACEITLevel 6 · 1,453 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER23,350 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,453csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning46
Utility32

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49–43–8Last 10049%Win rateWWWWWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +8.4pp headshot accuracy · +19ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 34%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 36%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Last 20

  • 12–6–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 604ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility3.2
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch2.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 611ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning4.6
Utility3.2
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact8.1

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time611ms−28ms
first ⅓ avg 639ms → last ⅓ avg 611ms
Headshot accuracy28.9%+5.2%
first ⅓ avg 23.7% → last ⅓ avg 28.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 15 Jul →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · dust2, 16 Sept →
344msFastest reaction time · 13–0 · dust2, 16 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 16 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W6Current streak
7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B4222–2052%0.00
mirageC2912–1741%-0.00
infernoD93–633%-0.03
nukeS64–267%0.02
anubisS54–180%0.02
cache—31–233%-0.03
vertigo—32–167%-0.01
overpass—10–10%-0.08
ancient—11–0100%0.03
office—10–10%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

52,487Lifetime kills
1.04K/D · Top 50% of Level 6 players
2,694Matches
47.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players
58.9%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 6 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
7,940MVPs
1,693Hours (in match)
1,721Bombs planted
980Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,186
SSG 082,849
AWP1,757
Knife1,171
P250795

Lifetime map wins

9,423dust2
2,838nuke
1,781inferno
206train
158vertigo
8ar_baggage
7office
4ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,118Matches
48%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
89.6ADR
57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage40650%1.1317.5
Dust239253%1.2419.1
Nuke11436%1.0015.8
Ancient5330%1.0116.3
Inferno5347%1.0917.5
Anubis4441%0.9715.3
Overpass2540%1.0215.5
Cache1741%0.9517.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.8%Headshot accuracy
33.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.6%Spray accuracy
84.8%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
611msReaction time
39.8%T opening success
46.6%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
6.82HE damage / grenade
4.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.8274% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage12–70.0428%9 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0546%9 Oct →
dust213–40.0135%9 Oct →
dust213–1-0.0333%4 Oct →
dust213–30.0227%23 Sept →
dust213–30.0634%20 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0432%20 Sept →
inferno13–70.0448%19 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0131%19 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0341%19 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0230%16 Sept →
dust213–0-0.0650%16 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0428%15 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0023%14 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0221%7 Sept →
mirage13–100.0119%3 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0738%3 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0514%3 Sept →
dust213–50.0826%26 Aug →
dust213–4-0.0624%21 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0727%21 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0917%21 Aug →
mirage13–40.0632%19 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0226%18 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0217%18 Aug →
anubis13–4-0.0350%18 Aug →
mirage4–130.0024%13 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0326%10 Aug →
anubis13–90.0616%10 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0119%10 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0317%10 Aug →
cache13–110.0225%7 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0332%7 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0121%6 Aug →
dust210–2-0.0512%6 Aug →
dust213–110.0229%6 Aug →
anubis19–16-0.0218%3 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0517%1 Aug →
dust213–70.1031%1 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0432%1 Aug →
vertigo13–20.0419%31 Jul →
vertigo13–6-0.0221%30 Jul →
dust212–120.0033%30 Jul →
nuke13–90.0025%28 Jul →
mirage13–110.0218%28 Jul →
mirage9–130.0211%28 Jul →
nuke13–60.0820%28 Jul →
mirage15–150.0324%28 Jul →
anubis13–70.1033%28 Jul →
dust211–130.0916%28 Jul →
mirage15–150.0117%28 Jul →
dust211–20.0411%28 Jul →
nuke13–00.1644%28 Jul →
dust213–70.0025%26 Jul →
mirage13–40.0425%24 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0028%24 Jul →
dust213–10.0526%23 Jul →
inferno3–9-0.1811%23 Jul →
inferno9–30.1621%22 Jul →
inferno9–130.1527%15 Jul →
dust25–130.0422%15 Jul →
dust28–130.0023%15 Jul →
cache0–11-0.080%15 Jul →
mirage13–20.1932%15 Jul →
dust29–50.1422%15 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0841%12 Jul →
mirage13–110.0121%8 Jul →
dust25–130.0336%8 Jul →
dust212–120.0419%8 Jul →
mirage13–100.0630%8 Jul →
overpass7–9-0.0832%5 Jul →
dust213–40.0229%4 Jul →
inferno6–9-0.0625%3 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0324%2 Jul →
vertigo3–13-0.0622%1 Jul →
dust29–13-0.009%30 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0420%30 Jun →
mirage4–13-0.0512%26 Jun →
dust213–4-0.020%26 Jun →
ancient13–60.0341%26 Jun →
inferno8–13-0.0039%26 Jun →
inferno5–9-0.1640%25 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0412%24 Jun →
nuke3–13-0.0915%24 Jun →
nuke13–80.0220%24 Jun →
dust211–13-0.0318%24 Jun →
mirage3–13-0.0617%24 Jun →
mirage13–90.0525%23 Jun →
dust213–110.0731%23 Jun →
office8–130.0131%23 Jun →
mirage8–13-0.0523%23 Jun →
dust212–120.0830%21 Jun →
mirage13–20.1037%21 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0517%17 Jun →
mirage3–13-0.0815%17 Jun →
dust23–13-0.0118%15 Jun →
dust21–13-0.0931%15 Jun →
inferno7–9-0.1911%14 Jun →
dust213–2-0.0125%14 Jun →
dust28–13-0.0329%14 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.