Whitecore02

Whitecore02 — CS2 Stats

DE76561199510719232[U:1:1550453504]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

973Tracked matches57%Win rate2023Tracked since
2,282Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.6 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating25,110Top 25% of 212,379 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#20373 of 259284 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,110 +3,967 12 Aug – 25 Oct · 25 days played
20,42925,110peak 25,11012 Aug25 Oct
25,110Peak Premier in tracked matches
26Days played since 2026-08-12

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 25,110
  • +2,481 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,890 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate55.1%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy3.0%13.0%13.2%10.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.191.061.07above
Match win rate52.0%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWhitecore02FACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,110 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning69
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT55–42–3Last 10055%Win rateWWWWWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −2.7pp headshot accuracy · +20ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 624ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 610ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility7.0
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch4.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 592ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.9
Utility7.0
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time600ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 600ms
Headshot accuracy23.8%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 23.9% → last ⅓ avg 23.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–6 · inferno, 14 Oct →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 16–12 · ancient, 24 Sept →
469msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · cache, 22 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 19 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W6Current streak
10–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 17mirageWeakest map · 27% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A1912–763%0.04
nukeS1712–571%0.04
mirageD154–1127%0.02
ancientB157–847%0.01
cacheB147–750%0.03
anubisA117–464%0.02
infernoS96–367%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 15). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

25,718Lifetime kills
1.19K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players
1,310Matches
52.0%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
55.1%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
3.0%Shot accuracy
3,626MVPs
523Hours (in match)
1,323Bombs planted
370Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,167dust2
1,871inferno
1,401nuke
401vertigo
125train
61office
9cbble
7lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

264Matches
50%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
81.1ADR
60%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
30%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust28059%1.2118.1
Mirage6639%0.9915.5
Ancient3241%1.1517.5
Inferno2646%0.9215.7
Anubis2548%1.2817.0
Nuke2050%1.2319.6
Overpass786%1.0816.9
Cache757%1.1119.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.2%Headshot accuracy
41.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.1%Spray accuracy
81.1%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
592msReaction time
40.0%T opening success
56.2%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
14.5%Flash assists
7.90HE damage / grenade
13.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–110.0031%25 Oct →
anubis13–60.0317%25 Oct →
anubis13–50.0518%18 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0410%18 Oct →
nuke16–140.1124%16 Oct →
nuke13–60.0823%16 Oct →
mirage5–130.0824%16 Oct →
nuke13–70.0830%16 Oct →
inferno13–90.0722%16 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0217%16 Oct →
mirage14–160.0217%14 Oct →
dust213–50.0024%14 Oct →
inferno10–130.0127%14 Oct →
inferno13–60.1435%14 Oct →
nuke13–30.0932%14 Oct →
anubis9–130.0531%12 Oct →
dust28–130.0226%8 Oct →
mirage13–30.0715%8 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0412%8 Oct →
inferno13–110.1024%8 Oct →
dust211–130.1218%8 Oct →
inferno11–130.0323%8 Oct →
ancient13–60.1118%8 Oct →
mirage11–130.0325%7 Oct →
nuke1–13-0.0425%24 Sept →
dust211–130.0821%24 Sept →
ancient16–12-0.0850%24 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0222%21 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.0718%20 Sept →
dust213–10.0336%19 Sept →
nuke13–10.0722%19 Sept →
dust213–50.0426%19 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0324%16 Sept →
dust213–70.0037%2 Sept →
mirage7–130.0315%31 Aug →
inferno13–80.0338%31 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0222%29 Aug →
cache16–140.0124%27 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0724%27 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0227%23 Aug →
inferno13–60.1134%23 Aug →
mirage8–130.0629%23 Aug →
dust213–20.0027%23 Aug →
cache13–80.0516%22 Aug →
dust28–130.0349%22 Aug →
nuke6–130.0328%22 Aug →
anubis11–130.0724%22 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0114%22 Aug →
cache11–130.0426%22 Aug →
nuke13–60.1145%20 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0518%20 Aug →
inferno11–130.0523%19 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0025%19 Aug →
nuke13–70.0725%19 Aug →
mirage13–60.0416%19 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0430%18 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0223%18 Aug →
dust213–160.0226%16 Aug →
cache6–130.0224%16 Aug →
anubis13–60.0727%16 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0319%16 Aug →
nuke13–80.0121%16 Aug →
cache13–20.1320%16 Aug →
ancient13–40.0218%16 Aug →
ancient13–160.0318%16 Aug →
cache13–70.0831%16 Aug →
mirage8–20.0241%16 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0322%16 Aug →
ancient15–150.0319%16 Aug →
dust213–90.0624%15 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0610%15 Aug →
cache14–160.0132%15 Aug →
ancient11–130.0339%15 Aug →
nuke13–110.0129%15 Aug →
ancient13–110.0224%15 Aug →
cache1–13-0.0317%15 Aug →
nuke13–40.0817%15 Aug →
dust29–130.0421%15 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0038%14 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0724%14 Aug →
anubis13–90.0316%14 Aug →
dust213–70.0526%14 Aug →
dust213–50.1120%14 Aug →
cache13–90.0722%13 Aug →
cache16–140.0418%13 Aug →
nuke5–130.0019%13 Aug →
mirage11–130.0220%13 Aug →
ancient9–130.0123%13 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0322%13 Aug →
mirage13–110.0521%13 Aug →
cache9–130.1429%13 Aug →
ancient9–130.0429%13 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.0139%13 Aug →
dust213–10.0825%13 Aug →
ancient13–80.0119%13 Aug →
ancient15–150.0128%12 Aug →
dust213–50.0628%12 Aug →
ancient13–60.0420%12 Aug →
nuke5–130.0119%12 Aug →
anubis10–130.1232%12 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.