ZeppoTV

ZeppoTV — CS2 Stats

AD76561199508812188[U:1:1548546460]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

723Tracked matches59%Win rate2023Tracked since
810Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,999Blue band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,268 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 723 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 10 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,999 +1,396 20 Feb13 Sept · 8 days played
13,60314,999peak 14,99920 Feb13 Sept
14,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,268Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-02-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,268
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 83 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-13
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-13

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 14,999
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-13
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 13 Sep 2026 and 18 Sep 2026.

Measured 13 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 6 Sep 2026 → 13 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,393), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate59.0%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy3.7%12.4%12.7%9.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.301.041.05above
Match win rate41.2%45.2%45.7%4.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZeppoTVFACEITLevel 6 · 1,268 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER14,999 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,268csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning66
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT55405Last 10055%Win rateWWWLWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +3.2pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 680ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 667ms

Last 20

  • 1082 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 671ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility5.4
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels5.3
Clutch2.8

Excellent counter-strafingEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 692ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning6.6
Utility5.4
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact8.1

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time689ms+32ms
first ⅓ avg 657ms → last ⅓ avg 689ms
Headshot accuracy25.0%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 24.2% → last ⅓ avg 25.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–2 · overpass, 28 Feb
47%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · ancient, 25 Feb
461msFastest reaction time · 5–12 · anubis, 4 Mar
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 6 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
39In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 7ancientWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A27151256%0.02
mirageA26161062%0.03
infernoC146843%0.02
ancientC114736%0.01
nukeS75271%0.05
overpassB63350%0.07
anubis43175%0.08
cache32167%0.10
train110100%0.01
poseidon1010%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

30,978Lifetime kills
1.30K/D · Top 25% of Level 6 players
1,520Matches
41.2%Match win rate
59.0%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 6 players
3.7%Shot accuracy
3,372MVPs
810Hours (in match)
957Bombs planted
363Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,397dust2
1,857inferno
1,152nuke
788vertigo
412train
122office
3ar_shoots
1ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

170Matches
49%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
85.7ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4455%1.2618.1
Dust22548%1.2518.4
Inferno2250%1.4718.9
Ancient1540%1.2116.9
Anubis1127%1.1219.1
Nuke450%1.2018.0
Overpass10%0.7311.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.1%Headshot accuracy
38.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
88.8%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
692msReaction time
39.4%T opening success
54.5%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
7.3%Flash assists
9.48HE damage / grenade
9.12Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.3884% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
train13–100.0127%30 May
nuke13–100.0534%30 May
mirage13–100.0532%22 May
mirage4–13-0.0517%21 May
mirage13–90.1124%21 May
cache9–130.0431%21 May
cache13–70.0920%7 May
anubis13–40.1534%7 May
cache13–80.1629%7 May
mirage10–130.0727%6 May
ancient12–120.0622%15 Mar
dust29–130.0723%15 Mar
overpass10–130.0125%15 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0412%15 Mar
dust213–5-0.0129%15 Mar
inferno12–12-0.0123%13 Mar
dust213–4-0.0023%13 Mar
dust23–40.0236%11 Mar
ancient7–130.0625%11 Mar
mirage13–100.0125%10 Mar
inferno13–50.0924%9 Mar
dust23–10-0.0537%9 Mar
inferno9–130.0213%8 Mar
nuke13–90.0513%8 Mar
mirage13–50.0134%7 Mar
mirage11–130.0117%6 Mar
dust213–100.0422%6 Mar
inferno13–10.0122%6 Mar
mirage12–120.0217%6 Mar
mirage13–80.0418%6 Mar
inferno10–130.0130%5 Mar
inferno9–130.0030%5 Mar
dust25–130.0529%5 Mar
dust211–130.0529%5 Mar
dust27–130.0520%5 Mar
anubis5–120.0124%4 Mar
dust213–10-0.0221%4 Mar
dust28–13-0.0222%3 Mar
dust213–80.0518%3 Mar
nuke10–130.0543%2 Mar
anubis13–20.1329%2 Mar
dust26–13-0.0219%2 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0417%2 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0218%1 Mar
mirage13–90.1126%28 Feb
overpass13–20.1823%28 Feb
dust213–70.0118%28 Feb
mirage13–70.0425%27 Feb
inferno8–8-0.0038%27 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0422%27 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0422%27 Feb
dust213–8-0.0115%27 Feb
dust213–80.0822%26 Feb
overpass5–40.1034%26 Feb
dust213–8-0.0320%26 Feb
mirage13–20.0511%26 Feb
dust213–10-0.0326%26 Feb
overpass10–130.0626%26 Feb
dust213–50.0731%25 Feb
dust28–13-0.0526%25 Feb
inferno13–20.0331%25 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0126%25 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0026%25 Feb
mirage13–60.0114%25 Feb
overpass6–13-0.0121%25 Feb
overpass13–110.0918%25 Feb
ancient13–30.0547%25 Feb
inferno1–9-0.089%25 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0226%24 Feb
nuke8–13-0.0730%24 Feb
inferno16–140.0423%23 Feb
ancient13–10.0630%23 Feb
mirage11–130.0531%23 Feb
dust210–130.0727%22 Feb
anubis13–90.0313%21 Feb
dust213–90.0915%20 Feb
inferno10–13-0.0120%20 Feb
mirage13–40.0132%20 Feb
mirage13–100.0321%20 Feb
ancient13–10.0442%20 Feb
mirage12–120.0226%20 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0211%19 Feb
nuke13–40.1121%19 Feb
dust211–130.0325%19 Feb
ancient5–13-0.073%19 Feb
poseidon6–90.0424%19 Feb
inferno6–9-0.0131%18 Feb
dust213–30.0923%14 Feb
mirage13–4-0.0328%14 Feb
nuke13–50.0221%13 Feb
inferno9–40.1632%13 Feb
nuke13–70.1723%13 Feb
dust22–13-0.1140%13 Feb
ancient13–20.0734%13 Feb
dust213–30.0318%13 Feb
mirage13–6-0.0024%12 Feb
mirage11–130.0522%12 Feb
mirage13–50.1224%12 Feb
dust213–40.1530%11 Feb
mirage13–10.0219%10 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →