Aduhor

Aduhor — CS2 Stats

US76561199489132549[U:1:1528866821]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

1,974Tracked matches45%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,835Hours in CS69Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,476Top 50% of 205,052 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#74553 of 252356 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,390 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,476 -439 26 Aug – 9 Oct · 11 days played
19,89821,177peak 21,17726 Aug9 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,390 +0 30 Aug – 3 Sept · 2 observations
1,3901,390peak 1,39030 Aug3 Sept
21,177Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,390Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-08-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,390
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 141 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 701 below peak (21,177)
  • -356 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,524 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,088), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate61.1%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy1.7%13.0%13.2%11.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.461.061.07above
Match win rate48.8%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAduhorFACEITLevel 8 · 1,390 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER20,476 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,390csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning52
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–42–4Last 10054%Win rateWWLWLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +2.4pp headshot accuracy · +1ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility4.2
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.2
Utility4.2
Mechanics8.9
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time600ms+43ms
first ⅓ avg 557ms → last ⅓ avg 600ms
Headshot accuracy20.8%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 11–2 · nuke, 2 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · inferno, 30 Sept →
406msFastest reaction time · 9–6 · inferno, 19 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 7 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 89% over 9anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2716–1159%0.01
dust2C176–1135%0.04
ancientA149–564%0.03
nukeS107–370%0.06
anubisD103–730%0.01
infernoS98–189%0.04
cacheA74–357%0.03
train—20–20%0.13
office—20–20%0.08
vertigo—11–0100%0.04
poseidon—10–10%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

54,761Lifetime kills
1.46K/D · Top 10% of Level 8 players
2,144Matches
48.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
61.1%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 8 players
1.7%Shot accuracy
5,451MVPs
837Hours (in match)
1,765Bombs planted
653Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,975inferno
2,451dust2
2,268nuke
1,251vertigo
398train
375office
5lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

503Matches
50%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
78.0ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15856%1.0615.8
Ancient10554%1.1116.2
Dust26945%0.9814.4
Inferno3938%1.0013.8
Anubis3861%1.0016.3
Nuke2945%1.0516.2
Vertigo1942%0.9514.0
Cache1338%0.9713.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy
38.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.9%Spray accuracy
89.9%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
601msReaction time
32.2%T opening success
41.3%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
5.57HE damage / grenade
7.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.1546% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–10-0.0025%15 Oct →
dust213–20.0730%15 Oct →
dust210–130.0115%14 Oct →
ancient13–80.0116%14 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0518%14 Oct →
anubis14–160.0318%14 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0022%14 Oct →
anubis5–130.0326%14 Oct →
inferno7–4-0.0127%14 Oct →
dust213–160.0022%14 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0320%14 Oct →
dust213–40.0010%13 Oct →
inferno13–100.1137%13 Oct →
dust28–130.0719%13 Oct →
train5–130.1633%13 Oct →
ancient13–70.0822%13 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0416%12 Oct →
mirage13–50.0011%11 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0113%11 Oct →
inferno11–130.0515%11 Oct →
dust211–130.1720%11 Oct →
dust212–120.0124%9 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0119%9 Oct →
ancient10–130.0210%8 Oct →
mirage13–00.0826%7 Oct →
anubis13–110.0321%7 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0240%7 Oct →
dust213–50.0419%7 Oct →
ancient13–70.0418%7 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0618%7 Oct →
nuke8–130.0529%6 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0315%5 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0516%4 Oct →
train4–70.0921%4 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0336%4 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0728%4 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0117%4 Oct →
inferno13–100.0650%30 Sept →
mirage14–160.0622%27 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0513%25 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0519%25 Sept →
ancient13–30.0116%25 Sept →
mirage10–130.0218%23 Sept →
mirage13–70.0325%22 Sept →
vertigo9–30.0411%22 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0328%22 Sept →
inferno13–100.0929%21 Sept →
cache12–120.0723%21 Sept →
mirage13–50.0922%21 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0315%21 Sept →
nuke9–3-0.0830%19 Sept →
nuke9–40.1934%19 Sept →
inferno9–60.0540%19 Sept →
nuke9–60.0319%19 Sept →
ancient16–12-0.0119%19 Sept →
anubis9–130.0219%19 Sept →
ancient2–130.0422%18 Sept →
ancient13–110.1016%16 Sept →
mirage12–120.0416%15 Sept →
dust211–130.0834%15 Sept →
mirage13–50.0831%15 Sept →
poseidon8–80.025%15 Sept →
inferno9–70.0420%15 Sept →
mirage13–60.2150%14 Sept →
dust213–70.0523%14 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0118%13 Sept →
cache13–70.0422%13 Sept →
dust213–110.0326%12 Sept →
ancient13–10.1724%12 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0312%11 Sept →
ancient13–70.0628%11 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0614%10 Sept →
dust213–50.1712%10 Sept →
inferno13–100.0420%10 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0311%10 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0611%10 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0713%8 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0318%8 Sept →
dust212–160.0015%7 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.016%5 Sept →
nuke11–20.2622%2 Sept →
office8–130.0824%2 Sept →
mirage13–90.0416%31 Aug →
cache13–90.0442%27 Aug →
mirage8–20.0710%27 Aug →
nuke13–70.1434%27 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.048%27 Aug →
cache13–50.0323%26 Aug →
office6–130.0815%26 Aug →
anubis9–130.1114%26 Aug →
cache13–80.0224%26 Aug →
mirage13–50.0120%25 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.0413%25 Aug →
dust214–16-0.0223%24 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0121%24 Aug →
mirage13–80.0425%22 Aug →
cache9–130.0516%22 Aug →
nuke9–60.0721%22 Aug →
anubis13–110.0519%21 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0015%20 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.