Anova97

Anova97 — CS2 Stats

SE76561199486226736[U:1:1525961008]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,560Tracked matches59%Win rate2025Tracked since
3,872Hours in CS112Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,046Purple band · top ~20.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+310Premier CS Rating · 16,736 → 17,046

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,046 +7,047 30 Aug – 11 Oct · 18 days played
9,99917,904peak 17,90430 Aug11 Oct
18,028Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,414Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
20Days played since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 858 below peak (17,904)
  • +3,996 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,954 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-25
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-25

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,885), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate52.5%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy0.2%12.7%13.0%12.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.031.051.060.03 short
Match win rate51.2%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAnova97FACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER17,046 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,414csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning58
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59–35–6Last 10059%Win rateTWWLWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · +50ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Last 20

  • 10–8–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 518ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility4.9
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 57% on T to 42% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning5.8
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact8.1

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time525ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 514ms → last ⅓ avg 525ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–10 · anubis, 27 Sept →
31%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · mirage, 6 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · inferno, 8 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 3 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
12–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 76% over 21cacheWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA3118–1358%0.01
dust2S2116–576%0.03
anubisB126–650%0.02
ancientS96–367%0.02
cacheD82–625%-0.02
nukeA85–363%0.06
infernoC73–443%-0.00
vertigo—32–167%0.07
eldorado—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

34,150Lifetime kills
1.03K/D
1,755Matches
51.2%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 7 players
52.5%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players
0.2%Shot accuracy
5,255MVPs
1,060Hours (in match)
1,969Bombs planted
454Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,328dust2
2,481inferno
2,165nuke
649vertigo
177train
38office
26italy
3ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

312Matches
50%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
82.0ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust29052%1.0515.3
Mirage6253%1.0816.3
Nuke4459%1.1117.1
Ancient3435%1.0518.4
Inferno2665%1.1616.8
Anubis2143%0.8713.2
Cache2025%0.8914.4
Overpass1450%0.9416.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.5%Spray accuracy
77.6%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
529msReaction time
57.3%T opening success
41.9%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
5.75HE damage / grenade
9.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.402 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage15–15-0.0221%11 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0331%11 Oct →
ancient13–40.0110%11 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0210%11 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0214%10 Oct →
anubis8–130.0325%10 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0719%10 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0211%10 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0413%10 Oct →
dust29–130.0727%10 Oct →
cache13–160.0324%10 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0411%10 Oct →
dust213–40.0123%9 Oct →
anubis13–60.1431%9 Oct →
mirage13–90.0919%9 Oct →
anubis13–110.0426%9 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0313%8 Oct →
ancient16–140.0118%8 Oct →
mirage13–50.0313%6 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0413%6 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.1031%6 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0119%6 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0123%6 Oct →
ancient6–130.0217%6 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0325%6 Oct →
mirage13–90.0023%6 Oct →
dust213–100.0218%6 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.105%5 Oct →
vertigo13–80.1520%5 Oct →
mirage12–120.0319%5 Oct →
mirage12–120.0310%4 Oct →
dust213–110.0523%3 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0410%3 Oct →
nuke13–30.0917%3 Oct →
dust213–2-0.0213%3 Oct →
mirage13–100.0415%3 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0720%3 Oct →
nuke13–80.0721%3 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0121%3 Oct →
mirage16–130.0524%3 Oct →
vertigo3–130.0119%2 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0223%2 Oct →
mirage9–120.1127%2 Oct →
dust212–120.0631%2 Oct →
mirage13–50.0427%2 Oct →
ancient13–20.1513%2 Oct →
mirage13–110.0616%1 Oct →
dust213–20.0619%1 Oct →
dust216–140.0920%27 Sept →
anubis13–100.1720%27 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0626%27 Sept →
anubis13–100.029%27 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0118%27 Sept →
cache11–130.0218%27 Sept →
dust213–20.0421%26 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0115%26 Sept →
dust213–70.0919%26 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0520%26 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0218%26 Sept →
cache13–80.0025%26 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0411%26 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0320%26 Sept →
ancient13–110.0517%25 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0213%25 Sept →
nuke9–130.0218%25 Sept →
anubis11–130.0310%24 Sept →
dust213–60.1523%24 Sept →
vertigo13–110.0520%24 Sept →
nuke13–40.1223%23 Sept →
dust213–40.0414%23 Sept →
mirage13–40.1529%23 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0020%23 Sept →
inferno13–50.0716%23 Sept →
ancient8–130.0314%23 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0519%23 Sept →
dust216–190.0115%23 Sept →
mirage16–130.0121%23 Sept →
cache2–13-0.0320%22 Sept →
dust213–5-0.072%22 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0211%22 Sept →
cache13–70.0115%22 Sept →
anubis13–80.0121%22 Sept →
eldorado9–50.0230%22 Sept →
dust213–60.1517%22 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0420%22 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0518%22 Sept →
nuke11–130.0625%22 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0224%21 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0413%21 Sept →
mirage13–80.0621%20 Sept →
nuke13–40.0815%20 Sept →
mirage9–130.0024%20 Sept →
mirage13–60.0819%20 Sept →
dust213–30.0513%20 Sept →
inferno13–60.019%20 Sept →
nuke13–100.0819%20 Sept →
mirage13–110.0218%19 Sept →
mirage13–110.0915%19 Sept →
mirage14–160.0327%18 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0123%18 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.