Dr. Kutas

Dr. Kutas — CS2 Stats

PL76561199480447691[U:1:1520181963]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

588Tracked matches53%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,163Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,744 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=27,259), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate59.8%51.0%
Shot accuracy2.4%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.211.09
Match win rate53.6%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDr. KutasFACEITLevel 10 · 1,744 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning74
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT5149Last 10051%Win rateWWWLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.07 avg rating · +1.1pp headshot accuracy · +8ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility3.5
Positioning7.4
Opening Duels5.7
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.9° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 42% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning7.4
Utility3.5
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time535ms+1ms
first ⅓ avg 534ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms
Headshot accuracy25.9%+4.5%
first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 25.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–11 · mirage, 30 Jul
55%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · inferno, 6 Sept
367msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · ancient, 27 Jul
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 12 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
1215In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 24nukeWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB38182047%0.03
ancientS2416867%0.02
anubisB126650%0.01
dust2B105550%0.02
nukeC83538%0.02
inferno31233%0.04
cache31233%-0.01
office21150%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

19,800Lifetime kills
1.21K/D · Top 50% of Level 10 players
740Matches
53.6%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 10 players
59.8%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 10 players
2.4%Shot accuracy
2,398MVPs
1,163Hours (in match)
314Bombs planted
200Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,609dust2
865inferno
740nuke
79train
79vertigo
30office
9cbble
6ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

374Matches
55%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
95.0ADR
59%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9452%1.2820.7
Dust27560%1.2118.9
Ancient6063%1.3519.9
Anubis4154%1.1818.5
Inferno2462%1.1420.5
Nuke2442%1.3219.1
Cache1553%1.2018.7
Overpass1030%1.2518.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.3%Headshot accuracy
41.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.0%Spray accuracy
75.5%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
542msReaction time
41.7%T opening success
56.7%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
3.21HE damage / grenade
10.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4127 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–90.0213%20 Sept
mirage13–100.0812%17 Sept
ancient13–70.1221%9 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0119%6 Sept
inferno13–60.1355%6 Sept
dust210–130.0327%30 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0126%15 Aug
ancient13–110.0131%15 Aug
mirage13–90.0826%15 Aug
ancient16–130.0522%10 Aug
ancient9–130.0530%9 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0325%6 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0026%6 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0118%6 Aug
cache13–110.0122%2 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0516%2 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0619%1 Aug
ancient1–13-0.0527%1 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0523%1 Aug
mirage13–90.0334%1 Aug
nuke13–60.0528%31 Jul
mirage10–130.0330%31 Jul
ancient16–140.0325%30 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0220%30 Jul
anubis13–40.0930%30 Jul
mirage13–110.1527%30 Jul
anubis13–80.0935%30 Jul
ancient13–70.0722%30 Jul
mirage10–130.0129%30 Jul
mirage10–130.0733%29 Jul
anubis14–160.0232%28 Jul
mirage16–120.0227%28 Jul
anubis14–16-0.0327%28 Jul
ancient13–110.0023%27 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0117%27 Jul
ancient13–90.0438%27 Jul
mirage13–20.0538%26 Jul
nuke13–30.1423%26 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0019%25 Jul
ancient9–130.0017%25 Jul
mirage9–130.0230%25 Jul
ancient13–100.0320%25 Jul
nuke11–130.0327%25 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0426%24 Jul
mirage13–60.1129%24 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0315%23 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0014%20 Jul
mirage13–60.0921%20 Jul
nuke13–50.0521%20 Jul
mirage13–160.0432%19 Jul
anubis13–110.0229%19 Jul
mirage11–130.0528%19 Jul
mirage16–140.0523%19 Jul
anubis13–100.0529%18 Jul
mirage13–90.0130%18 Jul
dust28–13-0.0530%18 Jul
nuke5–130.0323%18 Jul
mirage13–110.0226%18 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0716%18 Jul
mirage13–40.1041%18 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0124%18 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0124%18 Jul
mirage16–120.0216%18 Jul
dust26–130.0042%18 Jul
dust213–90.0327%18 Jul
ancient13–70.0930%17 Jul
dust213–70.0920%17 Jul
mirage20–220.0520%17 Jul
dust213–70.0536%17 Jul
mirage10–130.0114%16 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0031%16 Jul
mirage9–130.0113%16 Jul
dust28–130.0231%15 Jul
ancient13–60.0416%15 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0113%14 Jul
ancient13–70.0422%14 Jul
anubis13–110.0120%14 Jul
mirage10–130.0227%13 Jul
mirage6–130.0827%13 Jul
anubis13–70.0418%13 Jul
ancient20–220.0423%13 Jul
dust213–10.0226%12 Jul
mirage8–130.0127%12 Jul
mirage13–110.0225%12 Jul
inferno29–310.0727%12 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0125%12 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0221%12 Jul
mirage11–130.0114%12 Jul
mirage19–150.0424%12 Jul
dust29–13-0.0226%11 Jul
cache14–16-0.0220%11 Jul
mirage10–130.0118%11 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0422%11 Jul
cache8–13-0.0321%11 Jul
office13–6-0.0110%11 Jul
office7–13-0.0812%11 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0727%11 Jul
ancient13–90.0918%11 Jul
mirage16–140.0018%10 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0911%9 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 10500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →