Liquor man

Liquor man — CS2 Stats

CA76561199479306881[U:1:1519041153]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,053Tracked matches57%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,772Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating23,784Top 25% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#34746 of 260011 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Nov 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,784 +3,662 11 Aug – 2 Nov · 32 days played
20,12224,999peak 24,99911 Aug2 Nov
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
39Days played since 2026-08-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,215 below peak (24,999)
  • +2,517 over 30 days · improving
  • +3,662 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,216 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate53.7%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy3.3%12.4%12.7%9.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.911.031.050.14 short
Match win rate46.9%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLiquor manFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER23,784 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning58
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD54–46Last 10054%Win rateLLLLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +3.8pp headshot accuracy · +30ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility5.9
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch2.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 557ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.8
Utility5.9
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time554ms+6ms
first ⅓ avg 548ms → last ⅓ avg 554ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 3–13 · inferno, 3 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · office, 26 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · dust2, 24 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · office, 16 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L5Current streak
8–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 64% over 14ancientWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B1910–953%-0.02
cacheA1811–761%-0.00
infernoB158–753%0.01
nukeA149–564%-0.03
ancientC135–838%-0.01
mirageC94–544%-0.00
anubisA74–357%0.01
office—32–167%0.02
vertigo—21–150%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

35,979Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
2,644Matches
46.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players
53.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 6 players
3.3%Shot accuracy
4,532MVPs
961Hours (in match)
2,733Bombs planted
613Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,657nuke
3,324inferno
3,017dust2
2,370vertigo
759office
615train
28italy
18ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

138Matches
54%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
77.7ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3253%1.1314.8
Vertigo2467%1.0614.9
Inferno2152%0.9614.9
Anubis1753%1.0514.1
Nuke1644%0.9414.2
Ancient1242%0.8612.8
Overpass1050%1.0917.0
Dust23100%1.2311.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.6%Spray accuracy
87.7%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
557msReaction time
43.0%T opening success
38.3%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
9.10HE damage / grenade
11.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.3332% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient0–13-0.1413%2 Nov →
dust29–13-0.0226%2 Nov →
inferno5–13-0.0411%1 Nov →
anubis12–160.0513%1 Nov →
anubis11–13-0.0221%28 Oct →
cache13–110.0118%28 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0317%28 Oct →
office10–130.0250%26 Oct →
anubis13–80.0529%23 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0415%21 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0410%21 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0224%21 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0127%17 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0217%17 Oct →
nuke16–14-0.0415%13 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0121%10 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0622%6 Oct →
ancient9–30.0313%6 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0214%5 Oct →
mirage13–20.0112%5 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0420%5 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0535%5 Oct →
inferno13–20.0814%5 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0217%2 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0616%2 Oct →
inferno12–16-0.0010%2 Oct →
cache2–13-0.077%2 Oct →
inferno11–130.0415%30 Sept →
cache13–30.0415%29 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0624%29 Sept →
anubis13–100.0820%27 Sept →
cache13–110.0220%27 Sept →
inferno5–130.0513%27 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0017%26 Sept →
dust216–130.0023%25 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0119%25 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0118%24 Sept →
mirage6–130.0213%24 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0621%24 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0833%23 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0521%23 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0315%22 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0317%22 Sept →
mirage13–70.0123%16 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0021%15 Sept →
office13–4-0.0125%15 Sept →
anubis13–50.0422%14 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0023%14 Sept →
cache13–70.0226%14 Sept →
dust213–100.0728%14 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0119%14 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0724%13 Sept →
ancient3–130.0117%13 Sept →
vertigo7–130.0516%13 Sept →
inferno11–130.0529%13 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0516%10 Sept →
ancient13–90.0417%10 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0112%10 Sept →
inferno3–130.0919%3 Sept →
cache13–70.0314%1 Sept →
inferno13–30.0222%1 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.064%31 Aug →
cache13–3-0.089%31 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0131%24 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0627%24 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0515%24 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0117%24 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0321%24 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0111%24 Aug →
nuke13–90.0014%24 Aug →
mirage4–00.050%24 Aug →
dust213–16-0.0210%23 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0329%20 Aug →
cache13–60.0111%20 Aug →
anubis14–16-0.0819%19 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0318%17 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0213%17 Aug →
cache7–130.0527%17 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0315%16 Aug →
dust213–110.0529%16 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0433%16 Aug →
office13–00.0620%16 Aug →
vertigo13–70.0116%16 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0717%16 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0033%15 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0525%15 Aug →
dust213–80.0412%15 Aug →
cache13–90.0422%15 Aug →
ancient13–100.0021%14 Aug →
nuke8–130.0132%14 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0618%14 Aug →
inferno13–60.0022%11 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0139%11 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0341%11 Aug →
ancient13–80.0823%11 Aug →
cache13–50.0826%11 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0116%11 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0125%4 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0414%4 Aug →
cache13–60.0120%3 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.