legaN

legaN — CS2 Stats

CN76561199479303195[U:1:1519037467]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

732Tracked matches38%Win rate2023Tracked since
379Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating23,574Top 25% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#36989 of 259066 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Oct 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,574 +2,092 14 Jul – 15 Oct · 35 days played
20,69125,283peak 25,28314 Jul15 Oct
25,407Peak Premier in tracked matches
34Days played since 2026-07-14

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,709 below peak (25,283)
  • -1,540 over 30 days · declining
  • +2,680 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,426 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate51.3%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy5.0%11.2%12.0%7.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.150.991.02above
Match win rate49.3%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlegaNFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER23,574 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning68
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–49–4Last 10047%Win rateLWLLLTWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −2.9pp headshot accuracy · −94ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 419ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 378ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 425ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim9.1
Utility6.3
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels5.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 68% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning6.8
Utility6.3
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels7.7
Win Impact1.0

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time460ms−118ms
first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 460ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%−6.0%
first ⅓ avg 25.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 15 Sept →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · anubis, 11 Aug →
219msFastest reaction time · 3–5 · mirage, 19 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 15 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
8–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 55% over 29anubisWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2916–1355%0.03
mirageC208–1240%0.00
infernoC177–1041%0.02
anubisC83–538%0.01
nukeC83–538%0.02
ancientB84–450%0.04
cacheC52–340%0.05
train—21–150%0.03
vertigo—11–0100%0.04
office—11–0100%0.09
debris—11–0100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

21,906Lifetime kills
1.15K/D · Top 25% of Level 4 players
1,074Matches
49.3%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 4 players
51.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players
5.0%Shot accuracy
3,962MVPs
379Hours (in match)
1,648Bombs planted
524Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,514inferno
1,933dust2
856nuke
322vertigo
171train
112office
44lake
39cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.1%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.8%Spray accuracy
81.0%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
499msReaction time
67.7%T opening success
53.7%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
8.0%Flash assists
12.97HE damage / grenade
12.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis0–3-0.100%15 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0338%30 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0116%25 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0319%25 Sept →
mirage11–130.0319%25 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0027%24 Sept →
dust213–90.0033%24 Sept →
vertigo13–40.0424%24 Sept →
inferno0–2-0.000%22 Sept →
nuke13–50.0322%22 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0421%22 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0032%21 Sept →
inferno10–130.1031%21 Sept →
ancient13–110.0223%21 Sept →
inferno8–130.0124%20 Sept →
dust26–130.0212%20 Sept →
dust213–30.1526%20 Sept →
ancient11–130.1124%20 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.090%20 Sept →
nuke9–130.0233%20 Sept →
mirage11–130.1621%20 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0221%20 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0214%19 Sept →
ancient4–00.0225%19 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0129%19 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0120%19 Sept →
mirage7–130.0017%19 Sept →
mirage3–5-0.070%19 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0414%18 Sept →
inferno13–50.1026%18 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0213%16 Sept →
cache13–110.0917%16 Sept →
nuke8–80.1310%15 Sept →
ancient13–00.0818%15 Sept →
dust213–30.1831%15 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.015%15 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0433%14 Sept →
dust213–100.0423%14 Sept →
dust213–70.0323%14 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0422%14 Sept →
mirage15–150.0216%14 Sept →
nuke13–80.0319%14 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0217%14 Sept →
anubis13–70.0815%14 Sept →
inferno13–60.1116%14 Sept →
inferno15–150.0713%13 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0321%13 Sept →
inferno9–130.0421%5 Sept →
inferno5–9-0.0929%5 Sept →
cache13–60.1318%1 Sept →
mirage5–130.0032%1 Sept →
mirage13–100.0116%23 Aug →
anubis13–70.0835%22 Aug →
mirage9–130.0113%22 Aug →
anubis4–5-0.0525%17 Aug →
dust213–110.0829%15 Aug →
train11–130.0418%14 Aug →
train13–50.0242%14 Aug →
dust26–130.0223%14 Aug →
inferno13–80.0530%13 Aug →
anubis1–13-0.0467%11 Aug →
dust29–130.0131%11 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0426%11 Aug →
dust213–16-0.0810%8 Aug →
dust213–20.0626%8 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.0142%8 Aug →
dust216–130.0319%7 Aug →
anubis13–70.0620%7 Aug →
dust213–60.1245%5 Aug →
mirage5–130.0520%5 Aug →
anubis8–130.0524%5 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0322%5 Aug →
mirage9–130.0222%4 Aug →
dust213–40.1220%4 Aug →
ancient13–80.0719%4 Aug →
inferno9–50.0317%4 Aug →
mirage7–130.1431%4 Aug →
inferno13–30.0129%3 Aug →
ancient11–130.0727%3 Aug →
nuke5–130.0032%3 Aug →
cache11–130.0720%3 Aug →
inferno13–60.0424%3 Aug →
ancient0–3-0.0133%31 Jul →
mirage13–90.0124%31 Jul →
dust26–130.0925%30 Jul →
mirage13–5-0.0838%30 Jul →
dust28–130.0224%19 Jul →
inferno2–13-0.0162%19 Jul →
nuke2–13-0.0632%18 Jul →
mirage7–1-0.0221%18 Jul →
dust20–4-0.080%18 Jul →
office13–70.0939%18 Jul →
dust213–80.0328%17 Jul →
debris9–60.0810%17 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0322%17 Jul →
dust213–110.0919%17 Jul →
dust213–110.0435%16 Jul →
dust213–90.1315%14 Jul →
dust29–130.0425%14 Jul →
nuke9–130.0222%14 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.