Fiotão

Fiotão — CS2 Stats

BR76561199471537560[U:1:1511271832]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

610Tracked matches40%Win rate2023Tracked since
3,264Hours in CS83Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating24,151Top 25% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#31693 of 261621 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,151 +6,570 29 Jun – 13 Nov · 29 days played
17,29124,999peak 24,99929 Jun13 Nov
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
52Days played since 2026-06-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 848 below peak (24,999)
  • +1,139 over 30 days · improving
  • +6,740 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 849 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-08
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-08

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate56.1%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy7.0%11.2%12.0%5.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.300.991.02above
Match win rate44.0%43.9%44.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFiotãoFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER24,151 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92
Positioning56
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52–46–2Last 10052%Win rateLLLLWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −4.5pp headshot accuracy · +25ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 504ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 492ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim9.2
Utility5.9
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch2.0

Sharp aimerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2
Positioning5.6
Utility5.9
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact1.7

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time493ms−83ms
first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 493ms
Headshot accuracy25.5%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 24.0% → last ⅓ avg 25.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–5 · ancient, 12 Sept →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · dust2, 1 Nov →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · dust2, 1 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 6 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L4Current streak
8–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 61% over 28infernoWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2916–1355%0.02
mirageA2817–1161%0.02
ancientB126–650%0.03
cacheC114–736%-0.02
nukeB105–550%0.02
infernoD72–529%0.01
anubis—21–150%-0.01
overpass—11–0100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

129,144Lifetime kills
1.30K/D · Top 10% of Level 4 players
5,351Matches
44.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
56.1%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 4 players
7.0%Shot accuracy
15,563MVPs
3,371Hours (in match)
3,033Bombs planted
3,041Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4768,929
AWP8,277
MP91,392
P2501,147
Knife796

Lifetime map wins

11,687dust2
5,323inferno
3,858nuke
2,362vertigo
852train
158cbble
9italy
3ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

25Matches
80%Win rate
1.45Avg K/D
84.0ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage771%1.8820.6
Nuke475%1.1717.8
Ancient367%0.9517.7
Dust23100%1.7514.7
Inferno1100%1.0015.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.9%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.1%Spray accuracy
85.5%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
494msReaction time
39.3%T opening success
44.1%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
9.22HE damage / grenade
7.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.2685% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno7–130.0428%13 Nov →
cache11–13-0.0316%12 Nov →
ancient6–130.0112%11 Nov →
mirage13–16-0.0119%10 Nov →
mirage13–10-0.0416%9 Nov →
mirage8–13-0.0318%9 Nov →
dust213–10.1141%6 Nov →
dust213–80.0634%6 Nov →
nuke1–10-0.0317%4 Nov →
mirage9–130.0131%4 Nov →
mirage13–100.0429%2 Nov →
dust22–13-0.0430%2 Nov →
mirage11–130.0329%2 Nov →
mirage8–13-0.0122%1 Nov →
dust24–13-0.0445%1 Nov →
anubis13–90.0730%1 Nov →
cache13–90.0326%1 Nov →
ancient13–6-0.0225%1 Nov →
dust213–80.0422%1 Nov →
anubis10–13-0.1017%30 Oct →
cache2–13-0.0418%29 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0233%27 Oct →
cache13–90.0236%25 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0119%25 Oct →
mirage13–70.0214%25 Oct →
dust213–100.0530%25 Oct →
nuke13–100.0124%25 Oct →
ancient11–130.0630%25 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0724%23 Oct →
dust29–130.0120%21 Oct →
ancient13–90.0327%20 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0125%19 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0336%18 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0335%16 Oct →
dust213–110.0426%16 Oct →
mirage13–110.0728%13 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0136%12 Oct →
nuke13–80.0424%12 Oct →
mirage13–50.1022%5 Oct →
nuke13–90.0622%4 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0219%2 Oct →
cache13–50.0423%2 Oct →
mirage13–70.0722%28 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0221%28 Sept →
inferno16–140.0634%27 Sept →
ancient13–100.0725%27 Sept →
mirage13–30.0319%27 Sept →
dust213–40.0216%24 Sept →
inferno13–60.0328%23 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0418%23 Sept →
nuke13–60.1028%23 Sept →
mirage9–130.1430%22 Sept →
dust213–40.0513%20 Sept →
inferno10–130.0533%20 Sept →
ancient13–160.0223%18 Sept →
nuke5–70.0114%18 Sept →
mirage13–100.0530%18 Sept →
cache4–13-0.1015%17 Sept →
dust211–130.0223%17 Sept →
dust212–120.0430%15 Sept →
ancient13–50.1431%12 Sept →
ancient12–160.0126%3 Sept →
nuke13–80.0215%3 Sept →
dust213–80.0625%2 Sept →
dust213–70.0025%1 Sept →
dust213–50.0319%1 Sept →
mirage13–70.0319%30 Aug →
dust213–90.0325%30 Aug →
mirage13–40.1036%30 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0135%30 Aug →
overpass16–14-0.0317%26 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0531%18 Aug →
dust213–110.0024%18 Aug →
dust214–160.0427%18 Aug →
dust211–130.0423%17 Aug →
mirage13–100.0217%17 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0423%17 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0915%15 Aug →
ancient16–12-0.0121%15 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0218%15 Aug →
nuke10–130.0425%15 Aug →
dust212–160.0218%14 Aug →
mirage9–130.0226%5 Aug →
ancient13–90.0322%4 Aug →
dust26–130.0224%4 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0221%2 Aug →
dust213–50.0414%2 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0325%19 Jul →
mirage13–50.0421%17 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0521%17 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0533%14 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0115%14 Jul →
cache15–15-0.0318%12 Jul →
mirage13–80.0626%12 Jul →
dust213–80.0816%12 Jul →
nuke11–130.0140%12 Jul →
mirage13–90.0530%12 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0523%30 Jun →
ancient4–130.0229%29 Jun →
mirage13–110.0533%29 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.