medin

medin — CS2 Stats

US76561199470952219[U:1:1510686491]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,264Tracked matches74%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,729Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,815 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,264 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,507 +2,736 10 Dec – 28 Jun · 20 days played
21,44124,507peak 24,50710 Dec28 Jun
Faceit ELO: 1,815 +0 2 Sept – 26 Oct · 2 observations
1,8151,815peak 1,8152 Sept26 Oct
24,613Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,815Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2025-12-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,815
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 186 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate63.3%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy1.8%13.2%13.7%11.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.921.071.090.16 short
Match win rate50.4%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmedinFACEITLevel 9 · 1,815 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,815csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning73
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–37–9Last 10054%Win rateWLWWLLWTWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −4.2pp headshot accuracy · −45ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 514ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Last 20

  • 13–5–2 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility5.4
Positioning7.3
Opening Duels7.0
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning7.3
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels6.7
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time546ms−46ms
first ⅓ avg 592ms → last ⅓ avg 546ms
Headshot accuracy21.7%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 21.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–1 · mirage, 28 Jun →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 2–0 · anubis, 24 Jun →
328msFastest reaction time · 2–0 · anubis, 24 Jun →
13–0Biggest win · overpass, 27 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
6–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 10dust2Weakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB4725–2253%0.03
ancientB126–650%-0.00
anubisS108–280%0.02
nukeA106–460%-0.02
dust2D72–529%0.02
cacheA53–260%0.08
office—32–167%0.06
overpass—21–150%0.03
vertigo—21–150%0.09
inferno—10–10%-0.02
train—10–10%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

51,614Lifetime kills
0.92K/D
1,358Matches
50.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players
63.3%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 9 players
1.8%Shot accuracy
5,092MVPs
1,729Hours (in match)
1,113Bombs planted
1,597Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,027vertigo
1,976dust2
1,726inferno
1,294nuke
584train
391office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

592Matches
52%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
69.6ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage19347%0.9713.9
Ancient7046%0.8813.0
Vertigo6167%1.0214.3
Dust25746%0.8712.3
Anubis5153%0.9814.9
Nuke4151%1.0114.8
Inferno3444%0.9013.6
Overpass1747%0.9613.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
38.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.1%Spray accuracy
82.6%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
549msReaction time
51.8%T opening success
62.0%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
7.24HE damage / grenade
8.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass13–00.0813%27 Sept →
mirage10–130.0124%11 Sept →
cache16–140.0414%11 Sept →
anubis13–100.0419%10 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0210%10 Sept →
dust211–130.0320%10 Sept →
mirage13–110.0419%10 Sept →
anubis12–12-0.0320%9 Sept →
mirage13–40.0918%3 Sept →
mirage13–90.0518%6 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0832%6 Aug →
ancient15–150.0220%6 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0224%6 Aug →
mirage13–30.1639%6 Aug →
anubis13–90.0419%23 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.0116%28 Jun →
mirage13–10.1827%28 Jun →
mirage13–70.1220%25 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0514%24 Jun →
nuke13–10-0.026%24 Jun →
anubis2–00.10100%24 Jun →
mirage13–100.0126%24 Jun →
office12–12-0.0221%19 Jun →
nuke4–13-0.0524%19 Jun →
mirage13–80.0619%19 Jun →
anubis13–60.1517%18 Jun →
mirage13–100.0810%18 Jun →
mirage16–13-0.0019%6 Jun →
ancient13–70.0124%6 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.009%2 Jun →
cache9–130.0935%29 May →
mirage6–13-0.0412%22 May →
anubis13–10-0.025%22 May →
dust211–13-0.0125%21 May →
dust24–130.0224%21 May →
cache13–80.0520%21 May →
mirage13–100.0729%21 May →
ancient9–13-0.0526%21 May →
nuke13–110.0125%7 May →
mirage13–60.0424%7 May →
cache13–50.0928%1 May →
mirage13–90.0719%1 May →
vertigo12–120.1021%30 Apr →
cache6–130.1321%30 Apr →
mirage12–120.1513%30 Apr →
anubis20–22-0.0522%23 Apr →
nuke13–8-0.0229%17 Apr →
mirage12–120.0128%17 Apr →
ancient14–160.0113%16 Apr →
mirage5–13-0.0628%10 Apr →
ancient11–13-0.0318%9 Apr →
ancient16–12-0.0723%9 Apr →
mirage13–30.1126%9 Apr →
mirage4–130.0315%2 Apr →
ancient13–80.0220%13 Mar →
vertigo13–10.0711%13 Mar →
office13–80.1122%13 Mar →
mirage13–110.0823%13 Mar →
nuke9–13-0.0416%8 Mar →
mirage13–8-0.0120%8 Mar →
office13–80.0917%6 Mar →
mirage12–12-0.0021%6 Mar →
mirage11–130.0318%5 Mar →
mirage13–80.0528%5 Mar →
mirage13–10-0.0016%5 Mar →
mirage14–16-0.0214%5 Mar →
mirage7–13-0.0320%27 Feb →
anubis13–10-0.0322%27 Feb →
mirage12–120.0215%27 Feb →
mirage5–13-0.0523%26 Feb →
anubis13–10-0.0516%26 Feb →
overpass1–13-0.0216%26 Feb →
inferno14–16-0.0216%25 Feb →
ancient13–10-0.0133%20 Feb →
nuke13–3-0.0322%20 Feb →
mirage13–8-0.0221%20 Feb →
mirage13–3-0.0213%19 Feb →
ancient13–80.0314%19 Feb →
nuke11–0-0.0620%19 Feb →
mirage16–120.0323%19 Feb →
mirage13–100.0018%19 Feb →
ancient16–12-0.0113%18 Feb →
mirage3–13-0.0224%12 Feb →
mirage12–12-0.0024%12 Feb →
anubis13–10-0.0018%5 Feb →
ancient6–130.0122%5 Feb →
ancient11–130.0115%29 Jan →
mirage5–130.0614%29 Dec →
mirage13–30.0640%28 Dec →
mirage11–130.0218%27 Dec →
dust28–13-0.029%26 Dec →
mirage11–130.0227%26 Dec →
mirage13–16-0.0617%20 Dec →
dust213–80.1520%18 Dec →
train6–130.0524%18 Dec →
nuke11–130.0114%15 Dec →
mirage11–13-0.0432%15 Dec →
nuke13–110.0218%10 Dec →
mirage9–130.0120%9 Dec →
mirage13–60.1322%9 Dec →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.