Flapツ

Flapツ — CS2 Stats

76561199433259172[U:1:1472993444]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,668Tracked matches37%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,713Hours in CS46Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating12,662Blue band · top ~40.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,142 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,662 -2,104 30 Aug – 29 Sept · 3 days played
12,66214,766peak 14,76630 Aug29 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,142 +0 30 Aug – 20 Sept · 2 observations
1,1421,142peak 1,14230 Aug20 Sept
14,766Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,142Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,142
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 59 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,104 below peak (14,766)
  • -2,104 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 2,338 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches104——
Win rate58%——
K/D1.03——
Headshot %46%——

Measured 30 Aug 2026 → 2 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,886), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate51.8%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy2.2%12.7%13.0%10.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.181.051.06above
Match win rate48.8%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFlapツFACEITLevel 7 · 1,142 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER12,662 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,142csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning63
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50–50Last 10050%Win rateLLLLLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.5pp headshot accuracy · +14ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility6.6
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 60% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 60% on T to 34% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning6.3
Utility6.6
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact0.6

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time494ms−69ms
first ⅓ avg 562ms → last ⅓ avg 494ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–4 · inferno, 16 Sept →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 4–9 · inferno, 7 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · nuke, 24 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 14 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L5Current streak
12–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 86% over 7anubisWeakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA1912–763%0.02
dust2C187–1139%0.00
ancientB168–850%-0.00
anubisD165–1131%-0.01
cacheB136–746%0.01
mirageA95–456%0.00
nukeS76–186%0.02
vertigo—21–150%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

48,596Lifetime kills
1.18K/D · Top 25% of Level 7 players
1,965Matches
48.8%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 7 players
51.8%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players
2.2%Shot accuracy
4,816MVPs
1,540Hours (in match)
1,652Bombs planted
730Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,409
AWP3,885
MP91,475
FAMAS1,113
MAC-101,072

Lifetime map wins

3,590inferno
3,527dust2
2,006nuke
1,187vertigo
301train
38office
22cbble
2ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

580Matches
51%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
80.0ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno11758%1.1416.2
Dust211247%1.0115.2
Ancient8949%1.0215.9
Mirage8549%1.0516.1
Anubis6050%1.0715.9
Nuke5254%1.0516.1
Overpass2467%1.2015.0
Cache2438%1.0115.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
70.5%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
490msReaction time
60.4%T opening success
34.2%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
7.9%Flash assists
8.60HE damage / grenade
18.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 34.1813% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient11–13-0.0013%2 Oct →
mirage12–16-0.0229%2 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0610%2 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0223%2 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0220%2 Oct →
cache13–110.1018%1 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0325%1 Oct →
anubis13–110.0417%1 Oct →
ancient4–130.0214%30 Sept →
inferno16–13-0.038%30 Sept →
mirage13–80.0717%29 Sept →
cache13–160.0221%29 Sept →
anubis8–130.0017%29 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0328%29 Sept →
ancient9–130.0116%29 Sept →
inferno16–140.0510%28 Sept →
ancient16–13-0.0314%27 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0012%27 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0215%27 Sept →
anubis13–90.0221%27 Sept →
anubis11–130.0423%26 Sept →
mirage13–40.0720%26 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.046%26 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0219%26 Sept →
cache10–130.0320%26 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0120%26 Sept →
dust211–130.0117%26 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0420%26 Sept →
inferno11–00.0717%26 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0613%26 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.028%25 Sept →
ancient19–170.0214%25 Sept →
dust213–40.0418%25 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0724%25 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0213%25 Sept →
inferno13–60.1120%24 Sept →
mirage6–130.1019%24 Sept →
nuke13–40.0821%24 Sept →
vertigo13–10-0.0110%23 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0019%23 Sept →
ancient13–80.0333%23 Sept →
inferno14–160.0317%22 Sept →
inferno13–110.0416%22 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.066%20 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0914%20 Sept →
dust28–130.0015%20 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0414%20 Sept →
nuke13–70.0528%20 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.065%19 Sept →
dust28–130.0418%19 Sept →
inferno13–90.0021%19 Sept →
dust213–80.0019%19 Sept →
inferno5–130.0824%19 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0120%18 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0014%18 Sept →
anubis13–100.0217%17 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0717%17 Sept →
nuke11–130.0618%17 Sept →
inferno13–40.1127%16 Sept →
ancient13–70.0717%16 Sept →
cache13–20.0420%16 Sept →
ancient13–70.0422%16 Sept →
dust213–100.0318%15 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0017%15 Sept →
cache13–10.0411%14 Sept →
ancient13–50.036%13 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0116%13 Sept →
inferno13–70.0315%13 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0216%13 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0416%13 Sept →
cache13–6-0.017%12 Sept →
dust213–160.0819%12 Sept →
dust210–130.0213%12 Sept →
inferno11–130.0117%11 Sept →
anubis11–130.0212%11 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0514%11 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0112%11 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.057%10 Sept →
dust219–17-0.0117%10 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0121%10 Sept →
cache13–90.1010%9 Sept →
vertigo5–90.0515%9 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0014%9 Sept →
inferno13–70.0818%9 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0028%9 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0017%8 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0111%8 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0420%7 Sept →
inferno13–110.0117%7 Sept →
cache13–16-0.069%7 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.1535%7 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0125%6 Sept →
dust213–110.0010%6 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0326%6 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0016%5 Sept →
inferno12–16-0.0321%5 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0312%5 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0118%5 Sept →
nuke13–90.0311%4 Sept →
cache19–16-0.0318%3 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.