BALCOKNEE THE BALLSACK BUFFER — CS2 Stats

76561199417438325[U:1:1457172597]

1,687Tracked matches36%Win rate2023Tracked since
851Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.6 Learning
Premier CS Rating7,207Light Blue band · top ~68.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9702 of 12935 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBALCOKNEE THE BALLSACK BU…PREMIER7,207 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim48
Positioning46
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42553Last 10042%Win rateWLLLWLLLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.8
Aggression6.0
Utility5.2
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 691ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.8
Positioning4.6
Utility5.2
Mechanics4.2
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact0.2

Composite 3.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time684ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 679ms → last ⅓ avg 684ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 16.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — nuke 11–13
132Biggest win — inferno
5Longest win streak
48In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 47% over 17anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C23101343%-0.02
infernoC2391439%0.01
nukeB178947%0.02
mirageB157847%0.00
ancientD93633%-0.01
overpassC73443%0.00
anubisD51420%-0.02
train110100%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

31,964Lifetime kills
1.01K/D
2,056Matches
44.1%Match win rate
41.6%Headshot %
1.3%Shot accuracy
3,963MVPs
851Hours (in match)
1,525Bombs planted
387Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,827dust2
3,286inferno
3,034nuke
839vertigo
246train
96office
87italy
53assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1Matches
0%Win rate
0.65Avg K/D
70.2ADR
64%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
0Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.5%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.2%Spray accuracy
69.1%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
691msReaction time
35.9%T opening success
42.6%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
9.30HE damage / grenade
10.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.8512% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–60.1027%2 Apr
anubis4–130.0620%1 Apr
mirage5–130.0837%1 Apr
overpass10–130.0420%1 Apr
dust213–40.0016%1 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0238%1 Apr
dust28–13-0.0316%1 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0314%1 Apr
mirage15–150.0428%1 Apr
inferno4–130.008%1 Apr
anubis4–13-0.094%1 Apr
inferno6–130.0112%31 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0117%31 Mar
dust29–13-0.0630%31 Mar
nuke13–30.027%31 Mar
mirage13–3-0.038%31 Mar
inferno6–13-0.028%31 Mar
nuke13–100.0630%31 Mar
ancient10–130.029%31 Mar
overpass13–11-0.0617%31 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0220%31 Mar
dust213–40.0320%31 Mar
overpass11–130.0515%31 Mar
dust213–10-0.018%31 Mar
dust20–13-0.0630%31 Mar
dust20–13-0.1417%30 Mar
mirage10–130.0229%30 Mar
dust29–130.0229%30 Mar
nuke13–80.0420%30 Mar
nuke15–150.0220%30 Mar
inferno14–16-0.0416%30 Mar
mirage13–50.0232%30 Mar
ancient11–13-0.009%30 Mar
overpass16–14-0.0214%29 Mar
nuke13–100.0310%29 Mar
dust213–60.0315%29 Mar
dust24–13-0.0130%29 Mar
nuke11–13-0.0117%29 Mar
overpass9–13-0.0117%29 Mar
dust213–8-0.0612%29 Mar
inferno13–9-0.0128%29 Mar
inferno13–90.0718%29 Mar
overpass10–130.0214%29 Mar
nuke10–130.0630%29 Mar
nuke13–8-0.0612%29 Mar
ancient13–9-0.0511%28 Mar
nuke11–130.1415%28 Mar
dust213–70.0021%28 Mar
inferno10–130.0726%28 Mar
dust20–130.0119%28 Mar
dust27–130.0221%28 Mar
inferno11–130.0914%28 Mar
nuke13–40.014%28 Mar
nuke9–130.0613%28 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0118%28 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0519%27 Mar
overpass13–3-0.0012%27 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0435%27 Mar
nuke13–90.0920%27 Mar
inferno13–50.0128%27 Mar
nuke10–130.0222%27 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0519%27 Mar
anubis3–13-0.0611%27 Mar
dust213–90.0115%27 Mar
dust28–13-0.0822%27 Mar
ancient16–14-0.0510%27 Mar
inferno13–6-0.0020%27 Mar
inferno13–90.079%27 Mar
mirage13–70.0120%27 Mar
dust28–13-0.0712%27 Mar
dust26–130.0333%27 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0718%26 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0015%26 Mar
nuke7–13-0.0411%26 Mar
inferno10–130.0716%26 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0215%26 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0111%26 Mar
inferno15–150.0113%26 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0421%25 Mar
inferno13–20.0615%25 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0315%25 Mar
dust29–13-0.0425%25 Mar
ancient9–130.0619%25 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0122%25 Mar
mirage11–13-0.019%25 Mar
nuke12–90.0522%25 Mar
dust213–90.0123%25 Mar
mirage13–60.127%25 Mar
nuke13–6-0.0313%24 Mar
dust213–6-0.0011%24 Mar
inferno13–9-0.0312%24 Mar
ancient2–13-0.0615%24 Mar
dust24–13-0.1215%24 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0020%24 Mar
train13–20.1118%24 Mar
mirage11–13-0.1018%24 Mar
inferno13–8-0.0514%23 Mar
mirage6–130.0213%23 Mar
ancient13–100.0524%23 Mar
anubis13–4-0.0022%23 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →