atlas

atlas — CS2 Stats

76561199402629857[U:1:1442364129]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

93Tracked matches79%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.6 StrongOpening Duellist
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Performance scores

Aim94
Positioning70
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54273Last 8464%Win rateLWLLWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.07 avg rating · +5.8pp headshot accuracy · −81ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 466ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.10
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 387ms

Last 20

  • 164 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.13
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 428ms

Newest first, from the last 84 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Opening DuellistWinning opening duels is what stands out in this profile (+1.3 against its own average). How often you WIN the first duel — CSDB cannot yet see how often you take it.

Aim9.4
Utility3.6
Positioning7.0
Opening Duels7.3

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4
Positioning7.0
Utility3.6
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels7.0
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.10+0.05
first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.10
Reaction time487ms−49ms
first ⅓ avg 537ms → last ⅓ avg 487ms
Headshot accuracy21.4%−4.0%
first ⅓ avg 25.4% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 84 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.39Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 7 Aug
80%Best headshot accuracy · 1–2 · vertigo, 22 Mar
172msFastest reaction time · 1–9 · inferno, 24 Jul
13–0Biggest win · cache, 8 Aug

Across the last 84 tracked matches.

Highlights

15Longest win streak
33In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 74% over 27infernoWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
vertigoS2720774%0.07
mirageA148657%0.11
dust2S128467%0.03
anubisA127558%0.04
infernoD51420%-0.01
nuke43175%0.04
cache32167%0.12
office31233%0.06
overpass220100%0.05
fachwerk110100%0.12
train110100%0.05

Across the last 84 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.9%Headshot accuracy
39.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.2%Spray accuracy
85.2%Counter-strafing
7.5°Preaim
485msReaction time
55.6%T opening success
60.7%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
15.78HE damage / grenade
2.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.382 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache7–130.0225%2 Sept
dust213–30.0143%23 Aug
vertigo10–130.0239%23 Aug
anubis0–4-0.070%23 Aug
mirage13–40.2037%11 Aug
dust20–5-0.150%11 Aug
cache13–00.2535%8 Aug
mirage13–20.2426%8 Aug
inferno13–60.0625%7 Aug
mirage13–20.3941%7 Aug
mirage13–50.2425%6 Aug
vertigo13–50.2230%6 Aug
vertigo9–10.1827%1 Aug
vertigo9–00.2521%1 Aug
fachwerk13–60.128%26 Jul
vertigo13–40.0913%26 Jul
vertigo13–40.0621%26 Jul
vertigo13–90.2323%26 Jul
anubis13–60.2320%26 Jul
cache13–100.0825%26 Jul
vertigo13–20.1427%25 Jul
anubis12–120.0315%25 Jul
anubis7–00.0210%25 Jul
office13–70.0026%25 Jul
vertigo3–4-0.070%25 Jul
nuke13–00.007%25 Jul
anubis13–50.0818%25 Jul
anubis13–30.0113%25 Jul
dust213–50.1312%25 Jul
dust210–2-0.0011%25 Jul
inferno2–9-0.0724%24 Jul
inferno1–9-0.180%24 Jul
office3–13-0.0133%12 May
dust24–13-0.0721%22 Mar
vertigo13–50.1218%22 Mar
vertigo1–2-0.0780%22 Mar
dust211–130.0725%22 Mar
anubis4–130.0118%18 Mar
anubis4–13-0.0629%18 Mar
anubis13–10.0514%10 Mar
dust213–20.1230%18 Feb
mirage4–130.0814%18 Feb
mirage11–130.0521%18 Feb
dust213–40.1125%17 Feb
anubis13–40.0735%17 Feb
mirage13–70.0221%17 Feb
mirage10–130.0426%17 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0419%17 Feb
mirage8–10.1318%17 Feb
vertigo8–8-0.0232%10 Jan
dust210–130.0833%4 Oct
overpass13–70.0841%4 Oct
mirage8–130.0238%4 Oct
dust213–8-0.0425%5 Aug
mirage13–90.0114%28 Jul
overpass16–140.0320%27 Jul
dust213–70.0119%27 Jul
nuke13–90.0622%27 Jul
vertigo13–100.1035%15 Jul
nuke13–100.0525%15 Jul
anubis13–40.1027%11 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0521%11 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0517%11 Jul
vertigo13–80.1533%10 May
vertigo13–20.0447%10 May
vertigo1–80.0513%27 Apr
vertigo13–40.0830%27 Apr
vertigo10–130.1024%27 Apr
vertigo13–4-0.0533%27 Apr
vertigo13–70.0422%27 Apr
vertigo0–2-0.1233%26 Apr
vertigo13–00.1230%25 Apr
vertigo13–30.1023%25 Apr
vertigo13–40.0930%25 Apr
vertigo13–100.1429%25 Apr
inferno8–80.1732%25 Apr
vertigo3–130.0237%24 Apr
nuke4–130.0614%27 Dec
mirage13–80.0523%27 Dec
mirage10–130.0722%27 Dec
office5–120.2032%26 Dec
dust29–60.0523%25 Aug
train16–70.0512%25 Aug
vertigo2–9-0.060%10 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

15-Win StreakAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →