Pingwin! — CS2 Stats

DE76561198182960873[U:1:222695145]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,207Tracked matches58%Win rate2020Tracked since

8,324Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport

FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+3Tracked matches · now 2,207

−2.3ppWin rate · 60.0% → 57.7%

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 31 days played since 30 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

31Days played since 2026-06-30

CSDB’s own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

Metric	Last 7	Previous 7	Change
Matches	3	—	—
Win rate	33%	—	—
K/D	0.71	—	—
Headshot %	53%	—	—

Measured 12 Sep 2026 → 18 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,915), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 9 median	Level 10 median	vs Level 10
Headshot rate	40.8%	48.3%	51.0%	10.2% short
Shot accuracy	18.0%	13.2%	13.7%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.17	1.07	1.09	above
Match win rate	50.9%	46.9%	48.4%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52

Positioning48

Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–33–9Last 10058%Win rateLLWTWLWWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +3.0pp headshot accuracy · −48ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–2–1 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 22%
Avg reaction 591ms

Last 10

5–3–2 · 50% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 22%
Avg reaction 608ms

Last 20

10–6–4 · 50% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 20%
Avg reaction 632ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim5.2

Utility5.5

Positioning4.8

Opening Duels3.1

Effective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like jL 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 634ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2

Positioning4.8

Utility5.5

Mechanics5.9

Opening Duels3.7

Win Impact7.6

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time642ms−40ms

first ⅓ avg 682ms → last ⅓ avg 642ms

Headshot accuracy19.7%+0.9%

first ⅓ avg 18.8% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 9–6 · debris, 25 Jul →

60%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · vertigo, 2 Aug →

438msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · vertigo, 14 Sept →

13–1Biggest win · vertigo, 2 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak

L2Current streak

8–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

1Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 65% over 71dust2Weakest map · 33% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
vertigo	S	71	46–25	65%	-0.01
dust2	D	6	2–4	33%	0.00
cache	A	5	3–2	60%	-0.01
inferno	—	4	0–4	0%	-0.03
anubis	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.05
nuke	—	2	2–0	100%	-0.02
fachwerk	—	2	2–0	100%	0.03
shelter	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.08
ancient	—	1	1–0	100%	0.14
debris	—	1	1–0	100%	0.17
eldorado	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.08
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

193,970Lifetime kills

1.17K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players

9,586Matches

50.9%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players

40.8%Headshot %

18.0%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 9 players

33,947MVPs

3,234Hours (in match)

7,360Bombs planted

2,486Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4755,144

AWP33,015

M4A4 / M4A1-S23,029

Desert Eagle15,645

P2000 / USP-S7,938

Glock-185,693

SSG 083,751

Knife3,707

XM10143,601

Galil AR3,582

Lifetime map wins

51,271vertigo

4,833inferno

3,732dust2

3,305nuke

1,977train

586lake

570office

516cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

346Matches

55%Win rate

1.06Avg K/D

—ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.1%Headshot accuracy

31.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

33.5%Spray accuracy

76.3%Counter-strafing

11.5°Preaim

634msReaction time

47.5%T opening success

42.1%CT opening success

0.72Enemies flashed / flash

8.4%Flash assists

10.24HE damage / grenade

3.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.3851 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
vertigo	10–13	-0.02	29%	14 Sept →
vertigo	5–13	-0.06	16%	14 Sept →
vertigo	13–5	0.06	17%	14 Sept →
vertigo	12–12	-0.02	26%	11 Sept →
vertigo	13–5	-0.04	20%	11 Sept →
vertigo	10–13	-0.07	14%	11 Sept →
vertigo	13–6	-0.00	19%	11 Sept →
vertigo	13–11	-0.00	27%	11 Sept →
vertigo	12–12	-0.02	28%	10 Sept →
vertigo	13–9	0.03	23%	10 Sept →
vertigo	13–11	0.02	24%	10 Sept →
vertigo	13–6	-0.01	13%	9 Sept →
vertigo	12–12	-0.02	19%	9 Sept →
vertigo	13–3	-0.06	25%	9 Sept →
vertigo	13–6	0.02	14%	8 Sept →
vertigo	10–13	-0.04	15%	6 Sept →
ancient	13–2	0.14	15%	6 Sept →
dust2	8–13	0.01	26%	5 Sept →
inferno	6–13	0.02	19%	5 Sept →
vertigo	12–12	-0.05	20%	31 Aug →
vertigo	11–13	-0.03	17%	31 Aug →
dust2	13–3	-0.01	36%	23 Aug →
vertigo	13–8	-0.08	6%	11 Aug →
inferno	1–13	-0.04	5%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–16	-0.06	28%	9 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.01	19%	9 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.02	15%	9 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	14%	9 Aug →
vertigo	10–13	-0.03	28%	8 Aug →
vertigo	13–9	0.05	17%	8 Aug →
vertigo	2–13	-0.05	17%	8 Aug →
vertigo	13–4	0.01	16%	7 Aug →
vertigo	12–12	0.09	26%	7 Aug →
vertigo	13–5	-0.01	28%	6 Aug →
vertigo	12–12	-0.03	18%	3 Aug →
vertigo	13–4	0.09	20%	3 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	-0.02	26%	3 Aug →
vertigo	13–5	0.06	21%	3 Aug →
vertigo	13–8	-0.02	25%	3 Aug →
vertigo	10–13	-0.02	9%	3 Aug →
vertigo	13–6	-0.06	19%	3 Aug →
vertigo	13–6	0.03	21%	3 Aug →
vertigo	5–13	-0.06	16%	2 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	-0.04	13%	2 Aug →
vertigo	13–5	-0.03	60%	2 Aug →
vertigo	7–13	-0.01	19%	2 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	-0.03	33%	2 Aug →
vertigo	13–3	0.06	17%	2 Aug →
vertigo	6–13	-0.07	35%	2 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	19%	2 Aug →
vertigo	6–13	0.02	27%	1 Aug →
cache	12–12	0.01	22%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–6	-0.04	20%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.07	14%	31 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	12%	31 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.06	28%	31 Jul →
vertigo	13–11	-0.02	18%	30 Jul →
vertigo	12–12	0.00	26%	30 Jul →
vertigo	13–7	0.03	17%	30 Jul →
vertigo	13–11	-0.04	29%	26 Jul →
fachwerk	13–6	0.06	22%	26 Jul →
vertigo	13–4	0.02	15%	26 Jul →
vertigo	13–4	0.02	12%	26 Jul →
vertigo	13–9	-0.02	22%	26 Jul →
vertigo	6–9	-0.05	26%	25 Jul →
debris	9–6	0.17	15%	25 Jul →
eldorado	5–9	-0.08	24%	25 Jul →
vertigo	6–9	-0.12	21%	25 Jul →
vertigo	13–2	0.04	31%	25 Jul →
anubis	10–1	-0.00	28%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.01	5%	24 Jul →
vertigo	13–9	0.00	42%	24 Jul →
inferno	0–5	-0.04	0%	24 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.00	12%	24 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.06	21%	21 Jul →
vertigo	13–4	0.01	27%	18 Jul →
fachwerk	13–9	-0.01	20%	18 Jul →
vertigo	13–5	0.01	17%	16 Jul →
vertigo	2–13	-0.06	11%	16 Jul →
vertigo	13–6	0.04	24%	16 Jul →
vertigo	13–9	-0.01	15%	13 Jul →
vertigo	10–13	-0.04	19%	13 Jul →
vertigo	13–3	0.01	18%	13 Jul →
shelter	8–13	-0.07	24%	12 Jul →
shelter	11–13	-0.08	23%	12 Jul →
vertigo	7–13	-0.02	23%	10 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.08	9%	10 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.04	17%	10 Jul →
overpass	12–12	-0.02	10%	3 Jul →
vertigo	13–6	-0.05	13%	3 Jul →
vertigo	13–8	-0.03	15%	3 Jul →
vertigo	13–9	-0.01	10%	2 Jul →
vertigo	13–1	0.01	21%	2 Jul →
vertigo	13–11	0.02	22%	2 Jul →
vertigo	13–9	-0.02	22%	30 Jun →
vertigo	13–6	0.01	26%	30 Jun →
vertigo	13–9	0.04	17%	30 Jun →
vertigo	11–13	-0.05	14%	30 Jun →
vertigo	13–7	0.00	25%	30 Jun →
vertigo	13–4	0.06	20%	30 Jun →