bacardi

bacardi — CS2 Stats

76561198273499709[U:1:313233981]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,216Tracked matches66%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+3Tracked matches · now 2,216
−3.4ppWin rate · 69.0% → 65.5%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 20 days played since 23 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,000 +5,382 23 Jul1 Sept · 11 days played
19,50325,102peak 25,10223 Jul1 Sept
Faceit ELO: 994 +0 1 Sept13 Sept · 4 observations
994994peak 9941 Sept13 Sept
25,102Peak Premier in tracked matches
994Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
20Days played since 2026-07-23

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbacardiFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPEAK ELO994csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning40
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT70282Last 10070%Win rateWLWWWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −1.0pp headshot accuracy · +84ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility4.2
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.3
Clutch2.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 16% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 551ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning4.0
Utility4.2
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.05
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time530ms−66ms
first ⅓ avg 596ms → last ⅓ avg 530ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.34Best match rating · 9–0 · vertigo, 13 Aug
100%Best headshot accuracy · 1–9 · inferno, 24 Jul
375msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · mirage, 13 Sept
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 13 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

16Longest win streak
23In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 88% over 33anubisWeakest map · 44% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
vertigoS3329488%0.02
mirageS1612475%-0.02
infernoA127558%-0.05
cacheB105550%-0.01
anubisC94544%-0.02
dust2S64267%-0.01
poseidonA53260%-0.09
nuke31233%-0.04
office21150%-0.03
train220100%-0.00
overpass110100%0.15
fachwerk110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

171Matches
53%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
73.7ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3661%1.0414.4
Dust22259%1.3015.9
Anubis1953%0.7812.0
Vertigo1080%1.1516.6
Cache771%0.9013.0
Ancient650%0.9115.0
Nuke50%1.0518.8
Overpass475%0.7413.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy
33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.3%Spray accuracy
75.7%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
551msReaction time
16.0%T opening success
38.7%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
7.92HE damage / grenade
6.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3973 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 15.9643% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–60.0810%13 Sept
vertigo11–130.0215%13 Sept
vertigo13–6-0.0314%13 Sept
vertigo13–50.0213%13 Sept
vertigo13–20.0214%13 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0229%13 Sept
vertigo13–2-0.0233%13 Sept
vertigo13–50.0116%13 Sept
vertigo7–13-0.0215%13 Sept
vertigo6–30.014%13 Sept
vertigo13–60.0419%12 Sept
vertigo13–1-0.0510%12 Sept
vertigo13–50.1423%12 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0013%12 Sept
cache7–130.0416%2 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0720%2 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0324%2 Sept
vertigo13–30.1037%2 Sept
office0–13-0.020%2 Sept
office13–8-0.0411%2 Sept
vertigo12–12-0.037%23 Aug
nuke13–100.0211%21 Aug
cache7–13-0.0311%21 Aug
overpass6–00.157%21 Aug
inferno9–10.0118%21 Aug
vertigo9–5-0.0518%21 Aug
vertigo9–20.1310%21 Aug
vertigo9–1-0.0312%21 Aug
vertigo9–00.0536%21 Aug
train13–40.0319%16 Aug
dust21–13-0.0144%16 Aug
vertigo9–30.0214%16 Aug
vertigo9–3-0.0227%16 Aug
poseidon9–7-0.0721%16 Aug
vertigo9–20.0512%16 Aug
poseidon9–10.010%15 Aug
inferno9–00.0211%15 Aug
vertigo9–10.0318%15 Aug
inferno9–10.0913%15 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0515%13 Aug
dust213–7-0.0420%13 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0417%13 Aug
cache13–3-0.0418%13 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0420%13 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0434%13 Aug
anubis13–30.0110%13 Aug
cache13–30.0433%13 Aug
dust26–13-0.073%13 Aug
anubis13–00.0124%13 Aug
mirage13–60.1225%13 Aug
vertigo9–4-0.1536%13 Aug
vertigo9–00.3425%13 Aug
poseidon9–2-0.0817%13 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0813%13 Aug
cache6–00.0180%13 Aug
nuke1–7-0.070%13 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0223%13 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0640%13 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0621%12 Aug
vertigo7–10.0123%12 Aug
train13–10-0.0415%12 Aug
dust213–10.0231%12 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0460%12 Aug
inferno13–00.0213%12 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0415%12 Aug
mirage13–40.0013%11 Aug
vertigo13–80.0121%11 Aug
inferno1–13-0.1111%11 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0120%11 Aug
anubis13–160.0120%9 Aug
cache13–90.0029%9 Aug
vertigo6–13-0.0614%8 Aug
vertigo4–0-0.030%8 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0720%8 Aug
cache13–00.0318%8 Aug
mirage13–20.0418%8 Aug
inferno13–60.0120%7 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0411%7 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0811%7 Aug
cache9–13-0.0619%7 Aug
dust213–11-0.0120%7 Aug
anubis5–13-0.064%6 Aug
dust213–60.0224%6 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0713%6 Aug
vertigo13–50.0213%6 Aug
vertigo13–4-0.068%1 Aug
cache7–13-0.0820%1 Aug
cache12–12-0.0011%31 Jul
poseidon7–9-0.1114%31 Jul
inferno2–9-0.254%31 Jul
vertigo9–4-0.0614%30 Jul
poseidon2–9-0.2020%30 Jul
fachwerk13–60.0117%26 Jul
vertigo13–4-0.0010%26 Jul
vertigo13–40.0717%26 Jul
vertigo13–9-0.0120%26 Jul
anubis13–60.0114%26 Jul
anubis10–1-0.0225%24 Jul
inferno1–9-0.21100%24 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0216%23 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches16-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →