TheDemonInYou — CS2 Stats

DE76561199389850906[U:1:1429585178]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,401Tracked matches39%Win rate2022Tracked since

1,561Hours in CS

CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingSupport

FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,051), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 3 median	Level 4 median	vs Level 4
Headshot rate	53.8%	41.8%	42.7%	above
Shot accuracy	3.2%	12.2%	11.3%	8.1% short
Kill/death ratio	1.49	0.98	0.99	above
Match win rate	44.6%	43.3%	43.9%	meets

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50

Positioning52

Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY34–58–8Last 10034%Win rateWWWLLWWLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +8.4pp headshot accuracy · +23ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 24%
Avg reaction 538ms

Last 10

5–4–1 · 50% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 21%
Avg reaction 563ms

Last 20

7–11–2 · 35% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 17%
Avg reaction 552ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim5.0

Utility5.2

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels1.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 558ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0

Positioning5.2

Utility5.2

Mechanics3.6

Opening Duels2.9

Win Impact1.4

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time563ms−41ms

first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 563ms

Headshot accuracy17.5%−0.6%

first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 17.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–11 · shelter, 12 Sept →

33%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · office, 11 Aug →

391msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · office, 6 Oct →

13–1Biggest win · office, 16 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak

W3Current streak

12–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 43% over 63ancientWeakest map · 17% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
office	C	63	27–36	43%	0.03
ancient	D	6	1–5	17%	0.01
mirage	—	4	0–4	0%	-0.01
dust2	—	4	0–4	0%	-0.01
fachwerk	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.03
anubis	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.01
inferno	—	3	0–3	0%	0.02
poseidon	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.02
nuke	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.06
shelter	—	2	1–1	50%	0.09
boulder	—	2	1–1	50%	0.02
overpass	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.04
cache	—	1	1–0	100%	0.09
train	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.03
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.06
italy	—	1	0–1	0%	0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

91,566Lifetime kills

1.49K/D · Top 5% of Level 3 players

4,168Matches

44.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 3 players

53.8%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 3 players

3.2%Shot accuracy

13,297MVPs

1,561Hours (in match)

3,883Bombs planted

944Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4730,212

M4A4 / M4A1-S16,910

Desert Eagle12,155

P2000 / USP-S6,313

Glock-184,822

AWP4,148

MAC-103,829

MP92,689

P2501,569

P901,180

Lifetime map wins

14,932office

3,719dust2

1,977inferno

1,613vertigo

1,438nuke

1,301train

402italy

137cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy

32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.6%Spray accuracy

66.4%Counter-strafing

11.6°Preaim

558msReaction time

41.5%T opening success

42.1%CT opening success

0.46Enemies flashed / flash

1.5%Flash assists

10.92HE damage / grenade

6.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4607 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
office	13–10	0.07	25%	6 Oct →
office	13–6	0.03	20%	6 Oct →
office	13–8	-0.00	21%	4 Oct →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	23%	2 Oct →
office	7–13	0.01	33%	2 Oct →
poseidon	9–7	0.01	18%	2 Oct →
cache	13–4	0.09	16%	2 Oct →
office	3–13	-0.03	13%	2 Oct →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	22%	1 Oct →
office	12–12	0.07	20%	1 Oct →
ancient	6–13	0.05	14%	30 Sept →
office	4–13	-0.07	4%	28 Sept →
fachwerk	6–13	-0.02	13%	27 Sept →
office	13–10	0.01	10%	24 Sept →
office	6–13	0.03	24%	24 Sept →
office	13–7	0.00	11%	24 Sept →
ancient	8–13	-0.01	11%	23 Sept →
office	12–12	0.05	20%	23 Sept →
office	4–13	-0.03	10%	23 Sept →
anubis	4–13	-0.03	8%	22 Sept →
anubis	13–11	0.01	14%	22 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.00	25%	21 Sept →
train	13–7	-0.03	16%	21 Sept →
nuke	2–13	-0.05	17%	21 Sept →
nuke	3–13	-0.08	19%	21 Sept →
office	3–13	-0.05	6%	21 Sept →
office	13–11	0.02	24%	20 Sept →
office	13–10	0.09	21%	20 Sept →
office	13–10	-0.02	29%	20 Sept →
office	9–13	-0.00	20%	20 Sept →
shelter	6–13	0.03	15%	20 Sept →
office	11–13	0.12	17%	19 Sept →
fachwerk	9–13	-0.03	19%	18 Sept →
office	12–12	0.06	14%	18 Sept →
vertigo	7–13	-0.06	23%	18 Sept →
boulder	5–13	0.01	22%	18 Sept →
poseidon	7–9	-0.06	14%	17 Sept →
office	13–1	0.12	22%	16 Sept →
boulder	13–10	0.04	16%	16 Sept →
office	12–12	0.09	22%	16 Sept →
shelter	13–11	0.15	22%	12 Sept →
office	6–13	0.00	30%	10 Sept →
office	13–11	0.04	20%	9 Sept →
office	9–13	0.10	21%	8 Sept →
office	10–13	0.06	19%	8 Sept →
ancient	13–10	0.04	18%	8 Sept →
office	10–13	0.12	18%	8 Sept →
inferno	4–13	0.02	18%	7 Sept →
mirage	6–13	0.06	13%	7 Sept →
office	13–5	0.12	22%	7 Sept →
office	6–13	0.00	13%	7 Sept →
office	5–13	0.05	24%	6 Sept →
office	13–11	0.11	31%	6 Sept →
office	5–13	0.00	11%	6 Sept →
office	4–8	-0.07	17%	5 Sept →
office	9–13	-0.01	13%	5 Sept →
office	4–13	-0.03	19%	5 Sept →
office	13–8	0.01	16%	4 Sept →
italy	12–12	0.12	18%	4 Sept →
office	10–13	0.01	19%	1 Sept →
office	13–11	0.06	18%	30 Aug →
office	8–13	0.06	16%	30 Aug →
office	13–9	0.11	17%	30 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.02	12%	24 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.01	14%	24 Aug →
office	11–11	0.01	19%	24 Aug →
office	11–13	-0.03	14%	21 Aug →
office	9–13	0.04	21%	20 Aug →
office	11–13	0.04	18%	20 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.07	22%	19 Aug →
office	13–5	0.03	14%	19 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.02	28%	19 Aug →
office	13–9	0.06	22%	19 Aug →
overpass	3–13	-0.06	11%	19 Aug →
office	10–13	0.01	22%	18 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.04	25%	17 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.03	19%	17 Aug →
overpass	4–13	-0.01	27%	17 Aug →
office	11–13	-0.01	12%	16 Aug →
office	13–1	-0.05	12%	16 Aug →
fachwerk	3–13	-0.05	26%	16 Aug →
office	13–11	0.01	20%	16 Aug →
office	13–11	0.10	10%	14 Aug →
office	12–12	-0.01	12%	13 Aug →
office	13–6	-0.05	11%	12 Aug →
office	4–13	0.01	12%	12 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.02	22%	11 Aug →
office	5–13	0.02	33%	11 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	20%	10 Aug →
office	12–12	0.09	13%	10 Aug →
office	13–11	0.14	20%	10 Aug →
office	13–2	0.06	16%	10 Aug →
office	12–12	0.07	16%	10 Aug →
office	13–11	-0.00	15%	10 Aug →
office	3–13	-0.03	19%	10 Aug →
office	5–13	-0.04	17%	10 Aug →
office	13–5	0.10	24%	10 Aug →
office	13–2	0.08	14%	10 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.08	16%	6 Aug →
dust2	0–8	-0.07	11%	6 Aug →