Mordaqie

Mordaqie — CS2 Stats

76561199386376370[U:1:1426110642]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,547Tracked matches66%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,942 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,942 → 1,942
+2Tracked matches · now 1,547
0.0ppWin rate · 65.5% → 65.5%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 57 days played since 4 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,942 +0 16 Sept18 Sept · 2 observations
1,9421,942peak 1,94216 Sept18 Sept
1,942Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
57Days played since 2025-12-04

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,942
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 59 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-16
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-16

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMordaqieFACEITLevel 8 · 1,942 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,942csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning57
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT58393Last 10058%Win rateWWWWWWLWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −7.5pp headshot accuracy · −78ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 50 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 10

  • 811 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Last 20

  • 1451 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility4.1
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 560ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.7
Utility4.1
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time558ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 588ms → last ⅓ avg 558ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 21.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–5 · nuke, 31 Jan
40%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · nuke, 28 Jan
414msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · ancient, 1 Jun
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 5 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W6Current streak
1110In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 12dust2Weakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA33201361%0.01
mirageA2011955%0.02
nukeS1410471%0.03
anubisS129375%0.01
dust2C73443%-0.04
inferno43175%-0.02
overpass41325%0.00
cache2020%-0.05
train2020%0.01
vertigo110100%-0.01
fachwerk1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

465Matches
54%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
71.9ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient10754%0.8813.6
Nuke8556%0.9413.8
Mirage6352%0.9313.4
Anubis6053%0.8413.1
Inferno3946%0.8712.0
Overpass2945%0.8313.3
Train2759%0.8912.6
Dust22560%0.8111.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.0%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.1%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
560msReaction time
34.1%T opening success
44.1%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
8.31HE damage / grenade
5.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4084 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.1396% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–8-0.0219%11 Sept
vertigo13–10-0.0124%11 Sept
ancient13–40.029%11 Sept
anubis13–100.0119%11 Sept
nuke13–4-0.0410%11 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0210%7 Sept
cache11–13-0.0523%5 Sept
anubis13–1-0.0216%5 Sept
nuke13–20.0220%5 Sept
fachwerk12–120.0333%4 Sept
nuke13–90.0826%23 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0622%5 Aug
ancient16–12-0.0019%6 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0632%1 Jul
inferno16–14-0.0724%30 Jun
nuke13–30.1031%30 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0438%29 Jun
ancient13–100.0122%28 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0313%6 Jun
dust211–13-0.0431%6 Jun
ancient13–70.0625%6 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0612%6 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0117%5 Jun
dust26–13-0.0722%5 Jun
ancient13–110.0220%1 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0520%20 May
ancient13–10.1118%18 May
ancient12–16-0.0313%14 May
anubis7–13-0.0317%14 May
anubis13–100.0420%7 May
dust219–170.0120%3 May
ancient8–13-0.0125%2 May
ancient13–1-0.0020%26 Apr
ancient13–60.0126%26 Apr
nuke13–110.0015%25 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0215%25 Apr
cache6–13-0.0620%25 Apr
overpass10–13-0.0318%24 Apr
dust213–2-0.0232%24 Apr
anubis13–7-0.0114%24 Apr
dust24–13-0.0224%24 Apr
mirage11–130.0619%23 Apr
ancient1–9-0.076%23 Apr
dust210–13-0.0315%23 Apr
ancient4–00.1321%23 Apr
ancient10–130.0122%20 Apr
mirage13–70.0122%9 Apr
ancient13–60.0420%27 Mar
overpass13–60.0611%26 Mar
ancient8–130.0416%24 Mar
nuke13–100.0433%16 Mar
anubis13–9-0.0215%16 Mar
nuke8–8-0.0816%16 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0328%9 Mar
ancient13–80.0117%5 Mar
anubis8–4-0.0124%3 Mar
ancient13–90.0426%2 Mar
inferno13–90.0630%26 Feb
mirage13–6-0.0220%25 Feb
anubis7–13-0.0318%25 Feb
anubis4–00.0733%25 Feb
anubis13–60.1129%24 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0513%22 Feb
ancient10–130.0217%19 Feb
mirage13–90.0127%17 Feb
ancient13–2-0.0211%17 Feb
mirage13–50.0233%16 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0723%5 Feb
mirage13–90.1225%1 Feb
mirage13–60.1026%1 Feb
mirage11–130.0833%1 Feb
ancient7–130.0518%1 Feb
mirage11–130.0519%1 Feb
mirage9–130.1315%1 Feb
nuke13–50.2118%31 Jan
anubis12–12-0.0111%31 Jan
nuke7–13-0.0340%28 Jan
nuke13–20.1125%28 Jan
anubis13–110.0123%27 Jan
nuke13–110.0225%27 Jan
ancient13–110.0124%27 Jan
mirage13–110.0121%22 Jan
ancient4–130.0124%8 Jan
mirage13–11-0.0527%8 Jan
train13–160.0220%8 Jan
mirage13–30.0824%5 Jan
train10–13-0.0028%3 Jan
ancient11–130.0114%16 Dec
mirage16–140.0420%16 Dec
ancient5–13-0.0216%16 Dec
ancient13–110.0619%14 Dec
mirage11–13-0.0215%13 Dec
ancient13–90.1012%13 Dec
mirage11–13-0.0626%13 Dec
dust213–10-0.0821%13 Dec
nuke13–80.1019%11 Dec
ancient10–13-0.0320%11 Dec
inferno5–13-0.0324%10 Dec
inferno16–12-0.0321%8 Dec
overpass13–16-0.0216%4 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →