fr8st

fr8st — CS2 Stats

FI76561199382921962[U:1:1422656234]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

833Tracked matches50%Win rate2026Tracked since
775Hours in CS42Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=6,128), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate45.6%41.3%41.8%above
Shot accuracy0.3%12.7%12.2%11.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.940.950.980.04 short
Match win rate40.4%42.6%43.3%2.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGfr8stFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning61
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–48–6Last 10046%Win rateLLWLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −4.5pp headshot accuracy · −128ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 20

  • 5–15 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility4.9
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels5.0
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 606ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning6.1
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time609ms+64ms
first ⅓ avg 546ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms
Headshot accuracy25.5%−5.6%
first ⅓ avg 31.1% → last ⅓ avg 25.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 9–4 · inferno, 18 Oct →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 2–9 · inferno, 9 Oct →
297msFastest reaction time · 9–2 · inferno, 23 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 29 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

12Longest win streak
L2Current streak
12–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 60% over 5dust2Weakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB3517–1849%-0.01
infernoB3416–1847%-0.03
dust2D92–722%-0.00
ancientB84–450%0.01
anubisD62–433%-0.04
mirageA53–260%0.04
cache—21–150%0.02
debris—11–0100%0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

17,329Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
1,434Matches
40.4%Match win rate
45.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 2 players
0.3%Shot accuracy
4,177MVPs
330Hours (in match)
1,178Bombs planted
319Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,651inferno
2,995nuke
1,351dust2
167vertigo
49train
28lake
11safehouse
9ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

166Matches
46%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
65.4ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3549%0.9012.9
Anubis3456%1.0113.7
Dust22737%1.0813.5
Nuke2348%1.1015.3
Ancient1937%0.9912.7
Inferno1747%1.1114.8
Cache825%0.7812.3
Vertigo3100%1.1412.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.8%Spray accuracy
77.0%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
606msReaction time
36.1%T opening success
58.7%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
6.21HE damage / grenade
12.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.078% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust23–13-0.1050%4 Nov →
nuke12–160.0319%3 Nov →
mirage13–60.0117%27 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0612%27 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0222%27 Oct →
inferno1–9-0.1911%26 Oct →
inferno6–90.0326%26 Oct →
nuke4–9-0.1338%19 Oct →
nuke9–7-0.0530%19 Oct →
inferno9–40.2024%18 Oct →
inferno6–9-0.1022%12 Oct →
anubis16–140.0218%10 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0721%10 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0213%10 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0135%10 Oct →
nuke10–130.0416%10 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0725%10 Oct →
nuke6–90.0330%10 Oct →
inferno2–9-0.1067%9 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0247%9 Oct →
inferno5–9-0.0431%7 Oct →
dust213–110.1018%6 Oct →
nuke16–13-0.049%6 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0311%6 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0816%6 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0432%6 Oct →
inferno6–9-0.0715%6 Oct →
nuke1–9-0.1911%6 Oct →
nuke9–60.0420%5 Oct →
nuke2–9-0.1160%5 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0226%4 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.0527%4 Oct →
ancient13–60.0324%4 Oct →
dust213–80.0515%2 Oct →
nuke13–110.0520%30 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0421%30 Sept →
dust210–130.0531%30 Sept →
ancient13–70.0218%30 Sept →
inferno1–9-0.3418%30 Sept →
inferno5–9-0.1619%30 Sept →
mirage19–170.0621%29 Sept →
ancient13–20.0320%29 Sept →
dust217–190.0314%29 Sept →
nuke13–110.0123%29 Sept →
nuke9–30.0012%29 Sept →
ancient5–130.026%28 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0517%28 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0129%28 Sept →
cache13–40.0611%28 Sept →
inferno9–40.0712%28 Sept →
nuke8–8-0.0428%28 Sept →
inferno9–7-0.0323%27 Sept →
nuke9–40.0621%27 Sept →
inferno9–20.0629%27 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.0828%27 Sept →
inferno1–9-0.1216%27 Sept →
inferno9–30.0620%27 Sept →
mirage12–160.0722%27 Sept →
nuke9–7-0.0329%27 Sept →
inferno2–9-0.2343%24 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0413%24 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0122%24 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0132%24 Sept →
nuke4–90.0335%24 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.0919%24 Sept →
debris9–30.1241%23 Sept →
inferno9–20.1936%23 Sept →
nuke9–50.0948%23 Sept →
inferno9–40.1644%23 Sept →
nuke9–40.2053%23 Sept →
inferno9–70.1056%23 Sept →
inferno9–30.1260%23 Sept →
mirage13–20.1332%23 Sept →
inferno9–20.1533%23 Sept →
inferno9–40.0954%23 Sept →
nuke9–30.1463%22 Sept →
inferno9–4-0.0658%22 Sept →
nuke5–90.0416%22 Sept →
nuke7–9-0.0930%22 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.0917%22 Sept →
nuke7–9-0.0634%21 Sept →
inferno7–9-0.0114%21 Sept →
nuke4–9-0.0026%21 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0341%20 Sept →
nuke6–9-0.0754%20 Sept →
nuke9–7-0.1615%19 Sept →
inferno9–4-0.0338%19 Sept →
inferno3–9-0.1613%19 Sept →
inferno9–70.0221%18 Sept →
nuke9–60.0818%17 Sept →
nuke8–8-0.0216%17 Sept →
nuke8–80.0521%17 Sept →
inferno3–9-0.1530%17 Sept →
inferno9–2-0.0415%17 Sept →
ancient6–130.0719%16 Sept →
nuke9–7-0.0215%16 Sept →
inferno9–60.0524%16 Sept →
dust210–130.0119%15 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.0723%15 Sept →
nuke8–8-0.098%14 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches12-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.