zigi medium dih

zigi medium dih — CS2 Stats

76561199358270519[U:1:1398004791]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

578Tracked matches28%Win rate2023Tracked since
319Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.6 LearningPositional Player
FaceitLevel 4 · 948 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 16 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 4,731 +790 16 Apr22 Jun · 24 days played
3,4525,121peak 5,12116 Apr22 Jun
5,121Peak Premier in tracked matches
948Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-04-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 948
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 103 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,988), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate51.4%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy3.4%11.2%12.0%8.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.940.991.020.08 short
Match win rate44.6%43.9%44.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGzigi medium dihFACEITLevel 4 · 948 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPEAK ELO948csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning34
Utility28

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD40555Last 10040%Win rateLLTLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.07 avg rating · +2.2pp headshot accuracy · +37ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 041 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.09
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 686ms

Last 10

  • 271 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 683ms

Last 20

  • 6122 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 665ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim5.4
Utility2.8
Positioning3.4
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch1.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 34% on CT to 13% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 726ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning3.4
Utility2.8
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels0.5
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time643ms−67ms
first ⅓ avg 710ms → last ⅓ avg 643ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–8 · ancient, 17 Apr
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–3 · cache, 7 May
313msFastest reaction time · 0–3 · cache, 7 May
13–3Biggest win · ancient, 17 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
54In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 15nukeWeakest map · 27% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeD1541127%-0.03
ancientS1510567%-0.00
cacheB147750%-0.03
anubisD134931%-0.02
infernoD93633%-0.03
dust2D93633%-0.04
mirageS96367%-0.00
overpassD62433%-0.03
office41325%-0.07
vertigo2020%0.05
train1010%-0.02
warden1010%0.07
stronghold1010%0.00
poseidon1010%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

15,283Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
923Matches
44.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
51.4%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players
3.4%Shot accuracy
5,285MVPs
319Hours (in match)
651Bombs planted
292Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,014inferno
984nuke
812vertigo
735dust2
310safehouse
244cbble
232lake
220train

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

4Matches
25%Win rate
0.63Avg K/D
61.7ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
50%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient20%0.579.5
Mirage1100%0.6815.0
Train10%0.7014.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
30.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.4%Spray accuracy
87.2%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
726msReaction time
12.9%T opening success
34.1%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
2.0%Flash assists
7.15HE damage / grenade
8.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 725.764ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4003 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 12.9427% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke6–13-0.090%31 Aug
cache1–13-0.0725%30 Aug
inferno8–8-0.1222%28 Aug
office4–13-0.080%25 Aug
dust25–13-0.060%25 Aug
train7–13-0.0260%24 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0535%24 Aug
office4–13-0.080%15 Aug
office13–9-0.0617%10 Aug
anubis16–12-0.0514%22 Jun
inferno9–60.0014%21 Jun
inferno9–30.0614%21 Jun
inferno8–80.0721%20 Jun
warden5–130.0714%20 Jun
cache13–8-0.0332%20 Jun
anubis6–13-0.099%18 Jun
overpass16–14-0.0516%12 Jun
stronghold0–20.000%9 Jun
vertigo1–130.040%9 Jun
office9–13-0.0730%9 Jun
cache8–130.0323%8 Jun
inferno6–9-0.2025%4 Jun
cache1–13-0.0132%31 May
overpass9–40.0321%31 May
inferno3–9-0.0825%31 May
nuke15–15-0.0220%30 May
poseidon0–90.000%28 May
anubis8–13-0.0419%28 May
mirage13–60.0217%27 May
vertigo8–80.0524%27 May
cache13–10-0.137%26 May
ancient6–130.028%26 May
mirage0–13-0.0423%26 May
anubis5–120.0115%25 May
nuke11–13-0.0221%25 May
anubis4–130.0227%25 May
ancient2–13-0.0016%23 May
dust213–10-0.0017%23 May
nuke13–50.0425%23 May
nuke9–13-0.0732%22 May
cache13–60.057%20 May
cache2–0-0.050%20 May
cache13–10-0.0313%20 May
cache7–13-0.074%18 May
nuke11–13-0.0316%18 May
ancient13–90.0212%18 May
anubis7–13-0.0314%18 May
mirage13–70.018%18 May
ancient13–9-0.108%17 May
ancient6–13-0.0410%16 May
nuke6–13-0.0032%15 May
anubis15–15-0.0411%15 May
ancient13–9-0.0418%15 May
inferno10–130.0513%15 May
nuke7–130.0018%14 May
nuke12–16-0.0111%14 May
nuke11–13-0.0519%14 May
dust212–160.0611%11 May
nuke6–13-0.0519%11 May
anubis13–7-0.0421%11 May
overpass8–13-0.0621%11 May
mirage9–13-0.0323%10 May
dust25–13-0.0610%10 May
dust27–2-0.0917%9 May
ancient13–100.0422%8 May
inferno16–13-0.0727%8 May
dust28–13-0.088%8 May
dust27–12-0.037%8 May
overpass5–13-0.059%8 May
mirage10–13-0.1012%8 May
ancient16–14-0.0313%7 May
cache2–13-0.1013%7 May
cache13–100.1021%7 May
cache13–50.0224%7 May
cache0–3-0.06100%7 May
cache1–13-0.020%6 May
overpass13–160.0124%25 Apr
dust22–13-0.0922%24 Apr
anubis13–10-0.0110%24 Apr
nuke13–50.0025%24 Apr
inferno0–13-0.0025%24 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0224%24 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0915%19 Apr
anubis10–130.0113%19 Apr
anubis9–130.0417%17 Apr
nuke13–100.0119%17 Apr
ancient13–110.1228%17 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0112%17 Apr
ancient13–80.1315%17 Apr
nuke3–13-0.0714%17 Apr
ancient13–80.0211%17 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0311%17 Apr
overpass5–13-0.048%17 Apr
ancient13–3-0.0217%17 Apr
mirage13–80.038%17 Apr
anubis5–13-0.057%16 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0516%16 Apr
ancient13–8-0.0315%16 Apr
mirage13–50.1020%16 Apr
dust213–30.0422%16 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →