atom177

atom177 — CS2 Stats

76561198381144674[U:1:420878946]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

515Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,495Hours in CS
CSDB Rating2.9 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating4,999Grey band · top ~78.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 51 days played since 12 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 4,999 +3,381 25 Mar13 Sept · 29 days played
1,1114,999peak 4,99925 Mar13 Sept
4,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
51Days played since 2026-02-12

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 4,999
  • +2,710 over 90 days
  • Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 1 to go

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,017), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate39.8%41.3%41.9%2.1% short
Shot accuracy12.7%12.6%12.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.660.960.980.32 short
Match win rate37.4%42.5%43.3%5.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGatom177FACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER4,999 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim25
Positioning36
Utility18

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48484Last 10048%Win rateWWLLWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · −33ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 636ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 696ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 713ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim2.5
Utility1.8
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels2.1

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 721ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.5
Positioning3.6
Utility1.8
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact5.0

Composite 2.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time720ms+19ms
first ⅓ avg 701ms → last ⅓ avg 720ms
Headshot accuracy12.5%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 11.6% → last ⅓ avg 12.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–3 · overpass, 19 Apr
35%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · anubis, 25 May
484msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · anubis, 16 Apr
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 20 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
96In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 0% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA35211460%-0.03
nukeC1771041%-0.04
ancientA95456%-0.04
dust2D92722%-0.04
anubisD8080%-0.05
infernoS64267%-0.03
overpassB63350%-0.01
cacheA53260%-0.07
alpine21150%-0.04
vertigo21150%-0.03
office110100%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

60,684Lifetime kills
0.66K/D
4,552Matches
37.4%Match win rate
39.8%Headshot %
12.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 2 players
11,485MVPs
1,495Hours (in match)
5,224Bombs planted
520Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4711,231
AWP4,655
AUG4,104
SG 5533,214
P902,377
P2501,752

Lifetime map wins

5,876inferno
3,562vertigo
2,879nuke
2,409dust2
2,189train
976lake
859cbble
192office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.4%Headshot accuracy
25.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.8%Spray accuracy
75.9%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
721msReaction time
26.3%T opening success
41.5%CT opening success
0.29Enemies flashed / flash
0.6%Flash assists
9.46HE damage / grenade
1.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.3723% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 721.1573ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.288 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–4-0.044%13 Sept
ancient13–6-0.0714%11 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0317%11 Sept
mirage6–13-0.097%14 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0315%14 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0824%11 Aug
mirage8–130.0220%5 Aug
cache10–13-0.0810%23 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0419%22 Jul
mirage13–80.0214%21 Jul
mirage4–13-0.107%18 Jul
mirage13–9-0.038%18 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0511%10 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0618%8 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0119%1 Jul
mirage9–13-0.047%1 Jul
dust213–11-0.0423%24 Jun
mirage13–6-0.049%19 Jun
inferno5–13-0.1217%7 Jun
mirage7–13-0.028%7 Jun
nuke4–13-0.073%4 Jun
mirage6–2-0.050%31 May
mirage13–60.0211%27 May
anubis4–13-0.0835%25 May
nuke14–16-0.0526%20 May
mirage13–10.018%20 May
mirage13–70.049%18 May
mirage13–6-0.079%16 May
mirage13–11-0.052%15 May
overpass11–13-0.0612%15 May
nuke6–13-0.074%15 May
anubis15–15-0.029%15 May
nuke7–13-0.1014%14 May
alpine9–13-0.0421%14 May
office13–11-0.0610%9 May
vertigo5–13-0.0815%9 May
anubis2–13-0.095%9 May
cache10–13-0.1112%9 May
cache13–8-0.0913%9 May
dust27–12-0.0711%8 May
overpass5–13-0.0421%8 May
mirage10–13-0.066%8 May
cache13–7-0.0310%7 May
mirage9–130.007%1 May
cache13–10-0.056%1 May
dust29–130.0018%30 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0711%27 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0719%26 Apr
mirage13–50.0812%26 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0311%24 Apr
overpass13–5-0.0413%23 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0615%23 Apr
nuke3–130.009%22 Apr
mirage16–12-0.039%19 Apr
inferno13–10.0224%19 Apr
overpass13–30.0915%19 Apr
dust26–130.0515%19 Apr
dust29–13-0.0714%19 Apr
overpass11–130.0413%18 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0518%18 Apr
inferno16–12-0.0412%18 Apr
mirage13–10-0.068%17 Apr
ancient13–8-0.0611%17 Apr
nuke16–14-0.028%17 Apr
mirage13–70.077%17 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0410%16 Apr
mirage15–15-0.079%16 Apr
anubis5–130.0016%16 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0610%16 Apr
dust26–13-0.0927%16 Apr
anubis4–13-0.0711%16 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0913%16 Apr
ancient13–80.034%16 Apr
mirage13–50.037%16 Apr
nuke13–30.0010%16 Apr
inferno13–90.0530%15 Apr
nuke13–4-0.046%15 Apr
overpass13–1-0.065%15 Apr
nuke15–15-0.0610%12 Apr
anubis5–13-0.019%8 Apr
mirage2–130.0314%8 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0417%8 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0913%5 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0813%26 Mar
mirage13–60.018%26 Mar
nuke5–13-0.0225%25 Mar
mirage13–110.006%25 Mar
ancient13–50.0312%13 Mar
nuke12–12-0.144%13 Mar
nuke13–40.098%13 Mar
nuke13–7-0.078%11 Mar
ancient6–13-0.129%5 Mar
dust210–13-0.0611%5 Mar
dust213–6-0.0317%4 Mar
ancient5–13-0.045%1 Mar
mirage13–6-0.037%14 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0614%14 Feb
alpine13–11-0.0524%12 Feb
dust26–13-0.083%12 Feb
vertigo13–80.029%12 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →