Mateo Mustafa

Mateo Mustafa — CS2 Stats

DK76561199261029524[U:1:1300763796]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

329Tracked matches47%Win rate2022Tracked since
218Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.0 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,998), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate55.1%42.7%43.7%above
Shot accuracy18.2%11.3%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.100.991.02above
Match win rate44.3%43.9%44.7%meets

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 5 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMateo MustafaFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim41
Positioning39
Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD55–44–1Last 10055%Win rateLLLLLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −4.1pp headshot accuracy · −148ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 628ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 626ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 700ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim4.1
Utility2.9
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 36% on CT to 7% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 711ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.1
Positioning3.9
Utility2.9
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time732ms+79ms
first ⅓ avg 653ms → last ⅓ avg 732ms
Headshot accuracy22.0%+8.0%
first ⅓ avg 14.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 16–9 · vertigo, 13 May →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 7–0 · inferno, 22 Jan →
453msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · mirage, 27 Apr →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 26 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L5Current streak
15–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
65Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 80% over 10infernoWeakest map · 43% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA4224–1857%-0.02
vertigoB1910–953%0.02
infernoC146–843%-0.02
overpassS108–280%0.03
nukeC73–443%0.00
ancientS64–267%-0.02
cache—20–20%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

12,748Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
485Matches
44.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
55.1%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 4 players
18.2%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 4 players
1,303MVPs
218Hours (in match)
522Bombs planted
118Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,111vertigo
777inferno
462nuke
117dust2
34cbble
21train

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

275Matches
51%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
66.8ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1346%0.8413.9
Nuke450%1.0614.8
Vertigo333%0.8012.3
Ancient367%0.8114.3
Inferno367%0.9520.7
Dust2250%0.8616.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.5%Headshot accuracy
26.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
25.9%Spray accuracy
81.5%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
711msReaction time
7.2%T opening success
36.2%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
3.0%Flash assists
7.10HE damage / grenade
4.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 710.5968ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 7.2381% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage23–25-0.0315%5 May →
mirage4–13-0.0420%30 Apr →
mirage2–130.0220%29 Apr →
cache8–13-0.0317%29 Apr →
cache9–13-0.0515%29 Apr →
ancient19–17-0.018%28 Apr →
mirage13–10.0126%27 Apr →
mirage13–110.0516%27 Apr →
nuke2–13-0.0729%27 Apr →
mirage9–13-0.0515%26 Apr →
mirage13–60.0417%26 Apr →
mirage13–11-0.0311%26 Apr →
mirage13–00.0730%26 Apr →
inferno4–13-0.1216%12 Feb →
nuke5–13-0.0233%3 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.1424%27 Jan →
mirage8–130.0319%27 Jan →
mirage11–130.0820%26 Jan →
mirage13–11-0.1224%24 Jan →
mirage6–13-0.0926%24 Jan →
mirage13–10-0.0417%24 Jan →
mirage13–3-0.0340%23 Jan →
mirage13–11-0.0612%23 Jan →
mirage13–10-0.0230%23 Jan →
mirage6–13-0.115%23 Jan →
mirage13–8-0.0619%22 Jan →
inferno9–130.0319%22 Jan →
inferno7–00.0567%22 Jan →
mirage10–13-0.0422%22 Jan →
mirage13–6-0.0218%22 Jan →
mirage13–60.0221%21 Jan →
mirage8–00.0427%21 Jan →
mirage10–13-0.1032%21 Jan →
ancient10–13-0.068%18 Oct →
vertigo11–13-0.0513%15 Oct →
mirage16–3-0.0417%23 Aug →
inferno16–14-0.0530%20 Aug →
mirage7–16-0.0027%18 Aug →
mirage16–11-0.0423%2 Aug →
vertigo16–110.0212%1 Aug →
vertigo7–16-0.0511%5 Jun →
nuke11–00.0319%5 Jun →
inferno19–15-0.0317%5 Jun →
mirage16–8-0.0210%3 Jun →
vertigo16–90.0425%30 May →
vertigo10–160.0117%30 May →
overpass16–90.1120%30 May →
inferno6–16-0.0210%30 May →
inferno14–160.059%30 May →
inferno16–100.0316%29 May →
mirage15–150.018%29 May →
mirage16–10-0.0112%27 May →
nuke11–160.0210%27 May →
vertigo16–50.0812%27 May →
overpass16–130.0317%27 May →
vertigo9–16-0.0210%22 May →
nuke9–16-0.0011%21 May →
mirage16–14-0.0416%21 May →
vertigo9–16-0.0215%20 May →
mirage13–16-0.0319%20 May →
ancient16–14-0.057%20 May →
ancient16–110.087%19 May →
inferno16–90.0434%19 May →
mirage7–16-0.0227%18 May →
nuke16–14-0.0311%18 May →
inferno9–16-0.0214%18 May →
mirage22–200.0117%18 May →
ancient11–16-0.0219%17 May →
ancient12–1-0.046%17 May →
vertigo16–190.0112%16 May →
vertigo10–16-0.0516%15 May →
overpass16–140.0313%15 May →
vertigo5–16-0.1019%15 May →
overpass11–160.0314%15 May →
mirage6–160.0319%14 May →
mirage16–130.0511%14 May →
overpass19–150.049%14 May →
overpass16–50.0417%14 May →
nuke16–100.0714%14 May →
mirage19–16-0.0215%14 May →
mirage16–50.0415%14 May →
vertigo16–100.017%14 May →
vertigo16–60.0312%14 May →
inferno4–16-0.1310%13 May →
inferno16–120.027%13 May →
mirage4–16-0.0719%13 May →
overpass16–140.0517%13 May →
vertigo19–160.0912%13 May →
vertigo9–160.0230%13 May →
vertigo16–90.1114%13 May →
mirage19–17-0.0410%13 May →
overpass21–25-0.0111%13 May →
vertigo16–70.0814%13 May →
mirage15–19-0.0310%13 May →
vertigo16–50.0519%13 May →
overpass19–17-0.0013%13 May →
inferno20–22-0.0513%13 May →
overpass16–140.0116%12 May →
vertigo16–120.0512%12 May →
inferno7–16-0.0919%12 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.