BareMangus

BareMangus — CS2 Stats

NO76561199259321254[U:1:1299055526]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,493Tracked matches50%Win rate2022Tracked since
2,305Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAll-Rounder
CSDB Leaderboard#60771 of 257907 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,634 +2,635 25 Mar – 11 May · 7 days played
18,99922,654peak 22,65425 Mar11 May
22,654Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2026-03-25

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate51.6%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy15.4%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.821.061.07above
Match win rate49.6%46.3%46.9%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 9 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBareMangusFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning57
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD57–38–5Last 10057%Win rateLLWLWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −4.0pp headshot accuracy · −22ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 478ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 463ms

Last 20

  • 6–13–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 474ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.8
Utility5.8
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels5.2
Clutch6.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.7
Utility5.8
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time474ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 503ms → last ⅓ avg 474ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%+3.4%
first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–1 · mirage, 27 Mar →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · cache, 7 May →
344msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · mirage, 27 Mar →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 11 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak
L2Current streak
5–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 83% over 12ancientWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA3821–1755%0.02
dust2A138–562%0.04
anubisS1210–283%0.06
mirageB126–650%0.03
infernoA106–460%0.03
ancientC104–640%0.04
train—11–0100%0.09
boulder—10–10%0.01
fachwerk—10–10%0.06
vertigo—10–10%-0.01
nuke—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

106,464Lifetime kills
1.82K/D · Top 5% of Level 8 players
3,560Matches
49.6%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
51.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
15.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
11,751MVPs
1,298Hours (in match)
3,000Bombs planted
686Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4729,524
AWP15,367
MAG-73,306
MAC-103,173
P2503,105

Lifetime map wins

12,248inferno
1,716vertigo
1,637dust2
1,247nuke
795cbble
533train
330italy
46lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

192Matches
55%Win rate
1.26Avg K/D
81.3ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient771%1.3018.0
Nuke633%0.9516.5
Dust2425%0.9818.0
Vertigo333%0.8515.3
Mirage2100%1.1416.5
Overpass20%1.3822.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.8%Spray accuracy
80.8%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
471msReaction time
40.2%T opening success
61.3%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
12.0%Flash assists
8.01HE damage / grenade
8.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno4–13-0.0421%26 Oct →
cache8–130.0116%26 Oct →
ancient13–20.0713%26 Oct →
ancient9–130.0914%26 Oct →
train13–70.0926%26 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0119%24 Oct →
boulder9–130.0113%14 Sept →
ancient6–130.0513%14 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0212%12 Sept →
anubis10–130.1313%11 Sept →
cache13–60.0113%11 Sept →
cache13–100.0621%11 Sept →
dust212–120.0129%11 Sept →
inferno13–50.0822%10 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0119%10 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0418%9 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0314%9 Sept →
dust210–130.1435%8 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0315%8 Sept →
dust28–130.0313%7 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.134%7 Sept →
dust213–60.0828%7 Sept →
anubis13–4-0.0030%7 Sept →
ancient13–90.0333%7 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0319%7 Sept →
mirage13–110.0320%6 Sept →
anubis13–40.0613%27 Aug →
dust213–100.0924%27 Aug →
mirage12–120.0634%24 Aug →
cache13–70.098%24 Aug →
ancient13–110.1516%24 Aug →
cache6–130.0527%23 Aug →
cache13–70.0620%21 Aug →
fachwerk8–130.0617%31 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0519%31 Jul →
ancient11–130.0119%31 Jul →
vertigo4–13-0.0125%31 Jul →
nuke13–50.0124%31 Jul →
anubis9–30.0830%30 Jul →
inferno13–50.1023%30 Jul →
mirage13–60.1427%30 Jul →
cache9–10.044%29 Jul →
inferno13–80.0528%19 Jun →
ancient9–130.0221%19 Jun →
cache8–13-0.0518%18 Jun →
cache13–6-0.025%14 Jun →
cache13–80.068%9 Jun →
cache12–12-0.0720%2 Jun →
cache13–60.0717%31 May →
cache13–50.0131%30 May →
cache12–120.0424%30 May →
cache13–70.026%29 May →
cache5–13-0.0624%29 May →
cache4–13-0.0613%29 May →
cache13–50.1116%29 May →
cache13–50.0233%28 May →
cache9–13-0.0410%28 May →
cache6–13-0.0314%27 May →
cache13–20.0219%27 May →
cache13–90.0616%12 May →
cache13–10.005%11 May →
cache10–130.0228%11 May →
cache13–5-0.0118%11 May →
anubis13–10.0017%11 May →
cache6–130.0223%11 May →
cache13–20.0615%11 May →
inferno7–13-0.0010%11 May →
cache10–130.0222%11 May →
cache3–13-0.0111%10 May →
cache9–130.0224%8 May →
cache13–9-0.0226%8 May →
cache13–60.1014%8 May →
cache8–130.1114%8 May →
cache13–80.0950%7 May →
cache13–90.0413%7 May →
anubis13–110.0721%19 Apr →
anubis13–50.1122%19 Apr →
anubis12–120.1115%17 Apr →
mirage5–130.0128%17 Apr →
inferno13–9-0.0117%16 Apr →
inferno5–9-0.027%15 Apr →
dust213–90.0915%30 Mar →
ancient13–5-0.0220%30 Mar →
dust213–70.0111%30 Mar →
ancient10–13-0.0113%29 Mar →
anubis13–110.109%29 Mar →
inferno13–60.0617%29 Mar →
mirage13–80.0612%29 Mar →
dust213–110.0213%27 Mar →
mirage13–50.088%27 Mar →
mirage13–10.1720%27 Mar →
mirage13–10-0.000%27 Mar →
anubis13–10-0.0213%27 Mar →
dust213–30.0924%26 Mar →
dust212–20.010%26 Mar →
anubis13–50.1219%26 Mar →
ancient8–13-0.0011%26 Mar →
inferno9–130.1214%26 Mar →
dust213–100.019%26 Mar →
mirage11–130.0013%25 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.