Mr. Pork

Mr. Pork — CS2 Stats

MX76561199247183252[U:1:1286917524]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,795Tracked matches53%Win rate2022Tracked since
11,925Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating23,103Top 25% of 205,052 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#40885 of 252383 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Sep 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,103 +2,717 27 Jul – 29 Sept · 34 days played
20,38624,950peak 24,95027 Jul29 Sept
Faceit ELO: 949 +0 28 Aug – 4 Sept · 5 observations
949949peak 94928 Aug4 Sept
24,950Peak Premier in tracked matches
949Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-07-27

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,847 below peak (24,950)
  • +893 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,897 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches14——
Win rate43%——
K/D0.55——
Headshot %66%——

Measured 17 Sep 2026 → 16 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,290), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate55.3%42.7%43.7%above
Shot accuracy7.1%11.3%12.0%4.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.640.991.020.38 short
Match win rate30.9%43.9%44.7%13.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMr. PorkFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER23,103 · Pink bandPEAK ELO949csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning41
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–44–3Last 10053%Win rateLLLLWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.6pp headshot accuracy · +27ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 649ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 636ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim5.0
Utility5.8
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.3
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 14% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 616ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning4.1
Utility5.8
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time628ms−35ms
first ⅓ avg 664ms → last ⅓ avg 628ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 19.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.06Best match rating · 13–8 · cache, 8 Aug →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · anubis, 23 Aug →
453msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · nuke, 29 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 24 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L4Current streak
8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 42% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA3017–1357%-0.03
anubisC198–1142%-0.03
ancientB199–1047%-0.03
cacheS1812–667%-0.02
mirageS54–180%-0.01
dust2—42–250%-0.03
inferno—41–325%-0.03
train—10–10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

121,436Lifetime kills
0.64K/D
4,960Matches
30.9%Match win rate
55.3%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 4 players
7.1%Shot accuracy
5,979MVPs
11,925Hours (in match)
3,800Bombs planted
659Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4766,357
AWP3,038
MP92,662
MAC-101,865
P2501,408

Lifetime map wins

4,750dust2
4,488inferno
3,845nuke
2,190vertigo
791train
113office
31cbble
20lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

277Matches
49%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
78.9ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5942%1.1115.0
Inferno3551%0.9613.6
Ancient3259%0.9514.8
Vertigo2646%1.0715.5
Nuke2556%0.9615.2
Anubis2458%0.9914.5
Dust21164%0.9515.4
Train771%0.9315.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
30.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.6%Spray accuracy
79.0%Counter-strafing
12.5°Preaim
616msReaction time
14.0%T opening success
41.4%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
6.92HE damage / grenade
10.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.4661° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
train8–13-0.068%12 Oct →
anubis0–7-0.070%29 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0621%29 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0829%29 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0432%24 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0414%24 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0716%23 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0217%17 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0013%17 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0515%17 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0219%6 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0424%6 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0311%6 Sept →
anubis9–4-0.0322%6 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0122%6 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0215%5 Sept →
mirage16–120.0018%5 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.1120%5 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0428%5 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0522%4 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0817%4 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0220%3 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0216%3 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0614%1 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.049%29 Aug →
nuke13–3-0.058%29 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0510%29 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0320%26 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0311%24 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0025%24 Aug →
cache13–1-0.0023%24 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0439%23 Aug →
ancient13–1-0.0122%23 Aug →
ancient2–6-0.116%23 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0131%23 Aug →
anubis13–40.0217%23 Aug →
anubis1–13-0.0842%23 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0230%23 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0623%22 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0419%22 Aug →
ancient14–16-0.0331%22 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0224%22 Aug →
anubis16–13-0.0710%22 Aug →
anubis13–6-0.0019%21 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0611%20 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0221%20 Aug →
ancient13–16-0.0219%20 Aug →
nuke13–2-0.0216%20 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0613%20 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.016%20 Aug →
mirage2–130.0211%18 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0510%18 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0316%18 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0232%18 Aug →
cache13–16-0.059%15 Aug →
nuke16–14-0.0320%15 Aug →
nuke15–15-0.0016%14 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0616%14 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0313%14 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0416%12 Aug →
nuke15–15-0.0420%12 Aug →
dust213–80.0522%12 Aug →
anubis5–130.0123%12 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0231%9 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.0212%9 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.083%9 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0417%9 Aug →
cache13–80.0631%8 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0314%8 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0116%8 Aug →
cache13–30.0317%8 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0720%8 Aug →
ancient13–16-0.0114%8 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0128%8 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0324%8 Aug →
anubis13–6-0.0435%7 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0217%7 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0423%6 Aug →
ancient16–14-0.0114%6 Aug →
nuke13–20.0013%6 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0314%5 Aug →
nuke16–13-0.0423%5 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0410%5 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0327%4 Aug →
nuke13–40.0418%4 Aug →
inferno9–130.0029%4 Aug →
anubis13–60.0027%3 Aug →
cache16–13-0.0310%3 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0319%3 Aug →
ancient16–140.019%2 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0719%2 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0026%2 Aug →
nuke12–16-0.0316%2 Aug →
cache13–70.0119%1 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0321%1 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0126%1 Aug →
ancient15–150.0113%28 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.0326%28 Jul →
cache13–8-0.0418%27 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0019%27 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.