lukez

lukez — CS2 Stats

FO76561199238037439[U:1:1277771711]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,671Tracked matches47%Win rate2022Tracked since
3,736Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAll-Rounder
CSDB Leaderboard#82104 of 258842 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,827 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,054 +2,423 11 Jun – 4 Apr · 5 days played
17,63120,119peak 20,11911 Jun4 Apr
20,119Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,827Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
65Days played since 2024-05-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,827
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 173 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,986), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate65.0%50.9%
Shot accuracy11.0%13.7%
Kill/death ratio0.941.09
Match win rate53.4%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlukezFACEITLevel 10 · 2,827 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,827csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning57
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–52–2Last 10046%Win rateLWWWWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +7.2pp headshot accuracy · −17ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.7
Utility5.3
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch4.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 599ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.7
Utility5.3
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time601ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 601ms
Headshot accuracy23.9%−5.0%
first ⅓ avg 28.9% → last ⅓ avg 23.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 10–13 · nuke, 30 May →
68%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · dust2, 1 Mar →
391msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · ancient, 3 Mar →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 1 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
7–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 57% over 7ancientWeakest map · 35% over 26
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC269–1735%0.02
dust2B1910–953%0.04
anubisA1810–856%0.01
mirageB168–850%0.01
nukeC114–736%0.04
infernoA74–357%-0.01
train—21–150%0.03
overpass—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

90,565Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
2,898Matches
53.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 10 players
65.0%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 10 players
11.0%Shot accuracy
8,882MVPs
3,736Hours (in match)
5,027Bombs planted
968Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4741,045
AWP5,216
Knife2,472
MP91,990
MAC-101,268

Lifetime map wins

11,128dust2
2,485nuke
2,293inferno
889train
674vertigo
34lake
9cbble
6ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,993Matches
52%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
81.8ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust250854%1.2517.8
Ancient46050%1.2118.1
Anubis29649%1.1416.5
Mirage28251%1.1517.2
Nuke13644%1.1616.6
Inferno7446%1.0516.0
Train3858%1.3117.7
Vertigo2650%1.1717.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.2%Headshot accuracy
39.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.1%Spray accuracy
81.9%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
599msReaction time
32.0%T opening success
54.3%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
7.4%Flash assists
7.24HE damage / grenade
8.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.9711% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke3–13-0.0216%14 Feb →
dust213–80.0546%14 Feb →
mirage13–8-0.0922%13 Feb →
anubis13–90.0130%11 Feb →
inferno13–10-0.0239%11 Feb →
ancient9–130.0128%11 Feb →
dust213–80.0336%11 Feb →
inferno9–13-0.0228%10 Feb →
mirage10–13-0.0321%9 Feb →
anubis13–100.0122%5 Feb →
anubis2–13-0.0513%5 Feb →
anubis5–100.0210%5 Feb →
ancient5–13-0.0517%4 Feb →
dust213–90.0623%31 Jan →
mirage10–13-0.0423%29 Jan →
anubis7–130.0111%26 Jan →
ancient13–70.0946%23 Jan →
anubis11–13-0.0216%22 Jan →
anubis13–90.0430%21 Jan →
dust29–130.0628%18 Jan →
dust211–130.0626%15 Jan →
anubis13–5-0.0130%15 Jan →
ancient13–7-0.0020%15 Jan →
ancient11–130.0423%14 Jan →
anubis13–30.0913%13 Jan →
ancient12–160.0221%12 Jan →
anubis13–8-0.018%11 Jan →
ancient13–110.0228%9 Jan →
nuke7–130.0218%7 Jan →
nuke5–13-0.0123%7 Jan →
dust213–100.0616%6 Jan →
ancient13–9-0.0020%5 Jan →
ancient9–130.0740%4 Jan →
inferno13–90.0430%4 Jan →
ancient13–90.0833%3 Jan →
dust213–70.0231%2 Jan →
mirage6–130.0121%1 Jan →
overpass3–13-0.0238%31 Dec →
dust21–13-0.0531%27 Dec →
ancient8–13-0.0235%26 Dec →
mirage13–70.0728%26 Dec →
nuke4–13-0.0322%23 Dec →
nuke3–13-0.0213%18 Dec →
dust28–13-0.0441%27 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0517%26 Oct →
dust213–80.0430%26 Oct →
dust27–130.0238%23 Oct →
inferno13–90.0224%19 Oct →
nuke3–130.0727%19 Oct →
dust22–130.0139%19 Oct →
dust215–150.0219%4 Apr →
dust27–130.0326%4 Apr →
mirage13–80.0132%3 Apr →
anubis13–110.0323%2 Apr →
ancient13–70.1023%2 Apr →
ancient13–30.0817%2 Apr →
mirage13–110.0535%2 Apr →
train13–80.0532%1 Apr →
mirage7–130.0229%1 Apr →
dust213–30.0446%31 Mar →
ancient6–13-0.077%31 Mar →
nuke19–15-0.0021%31 Mar →
dust213–80.0431%30 Mar →
anubis7–130.0328%26 Mar →
ancient13–160.0317%26 Mar →
ancient7–13-0.0335%19 Mar →
ancient29–31-0.0323%14 Mar →
mirage13–110.0123%14 Mar →
mirage13–70.0635%12 Mar →
mirage6–13-0.0132%10 Mar →
ancient9–130.0642%4 Mar →
inferno8–13-0.0623%4 Mar →
ancient3–13-0.0524%3 Mar →
ancient5–13-0.0723%3 Mar →
anubis13–11-0.0036%2 Mar →
ancient13–80.0243%2 Mar →
ancient13–30.1240%1 Mar →
dust213–10.1268%1 Mar →
ancient8–130.0334%1 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.0226%26 Feb →
ancient10–130.0427%26 Feb →
train15–150.0116%26 Feb →
ancient10–13-0.0133%18 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0119%4 Jul →
anubis13–70.0820%4 Jul →
anubis13–110.0018%2 Jul →
mirage13–90.0329%23 Jun →
nuke13–20.0917%23 Jun →
anubis11–130.0421%21 Jun →
nuke13–50.0225%21 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.0728%15 Jun →
mirage6–130.0720%14 Jun →
dust211–130.0322%13 Jun →
anubis11–13-0.0326%12 Jun →
mirage13–7-0.0126%12 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0437%11 Jun →
nuke13–40.1329%11 Jun →
inferno16–140.0327%2 Jun →
dust213–30.1433%31 May →
nuke10–130.2137%30 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.