Andij

Andij — CS2 Stats

DE76561198018517619[U:1:58251891]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

501Tracked matches62%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#8652 of 258839 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,177 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,625 +6,081 7 Feb – 24 Oct · 18 days played
19,23926,625peak 26,6257 Feb24 Oct
26,680Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,177Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2025-01-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,177
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 323 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAndijFACEITLevel 10 · 2,177 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,177csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning60
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–42–3Last 10055%Win rateLWWLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −4.2pp headshot accuracy · −41ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 554ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility4.7
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch5.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.0
Utility4.7
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact9.0

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time591ms−48ms
first ⅓ avg 638ms → last ⅓ avg 591ms
Headshot accuracy22.1%−2.4%
first ⅓ avg 24.5% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 13–2 · cache, 22 May →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · inferno, 15 Feb →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–0 · mirage, 5 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 5 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

13Longest win streak
7–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 80% over 15nukeWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2816–1257%-0.00
ancientB168–850%0.02
dust2S1512–380%0.03
infernoB147–750%0.03
nukeD113–827%0.02
anubisB84–450%0.04
cache—32–167%0.09
train—32–167%0.02
overpass—21–150%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

454Matches
56%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
77.2ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust25267%1.0615.8
Mirage2752%1.1716.5
Ancient2446%1.1117.8
Anubis2250%1.0515.4
Nuke650%1.1313.5
Train540%0.9414.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
87.2%Counter-strafing
7.4°Preaim
578msReaction time
32.3%T opening success
57.1%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
5.23HE damage / grenade
8.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.2764% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno7–130.0214%18 Sept →
ancient13–50.0718%6 Aug →
cache13–30.0729%6 Aug →
mirage1–13-0.090%6 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0531%5 Aug →
mirage4–130.0438%5 Aug →
dust213–3-0.0411%5 Aug →
mirage13–0-0.0216%5 Aug →
dust28–10.0312%5 Aug →
anubis13–110.0818%4 Aug →
dust213–70.0728%16 Jul →
anubis7–130.0314%4 Jul →
overpass9–13-0.0024%4 Jul →
overpass6–00.1123%4 Jul →
ancient13–9-0.0119%4 Jul →
mirage0–6-0.0625%4 Jul →
cache13–20.2340%22 May →
nuke3–13-0.0315%14 Feb →
dust213–80.1422%14 Feb →
mirage13–80.1319%13 Feb →
anubis13–90.0916%11 Feb →
inferno13–10-0.0124%11 Feb →
ancient9–13-0.0223%11 Feb →
dust213–80.0142%11 Feb →
dust213–90.0216%31 Jan →
mirage10–13-0.0417%29 Jan →
nuke15–15-0.0020%24 Oct →
inferno13–70.0334%24 Oct →
mirage13–50.0115%18 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0131%18 Oct →
dust213–80.0825%17 Oct →
nuke13–100.1315%17 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0435%17 Oct →
nuke12–160.0121%17 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0134%16 Oct →
inferno8–130.0121%16 Oct →
dust213–50.0335%16 Oct →
nuke13–110.0329%16 Oct →
ancient13–100.0721%13 Oct →
nuke13–100.0826%4 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0322%18 Jun →
mirage13–100.0639%10 Jun →
anubis16–140.0626%10 Jun →
nuke6–13-0.0215%6 Apr →
mirage13–80.0222%3 Apr →
anubis7–13-0.0320%26 Mar →
ancient13–160.0120%26 Mar →
ancient29–31-0.0024%14 Mar →
mirage13–11-0.0221%14 Mar →
train9–13-0.0010%9 Mar →
dust22–130.0120%9 Mar →
ancient3–13-0.0216%3 Mar →
ancient13–80.0225%2 Mar →
mirage13–110.0635%2 Mar →
inferno1–70.000%1 Mar →
mirage6–13-0.1533%1 Mar →
mirage3–13-0.0422%1 Mar →
nuke7–130.0529%1 Mar →
inferno8–130.0424%1 Mar →
dust213–60.0827%1 Mar →
inferno10–130.0532%28 Feb →
nuke5–13-0.0628%24 Feb →
ancient1–9-0.0338%24 Feb →
mirage13–7-0.0524%23 Feb →
inferno13–90.0222%23 Feb →
ancient13–160.0624%23 Feb →
mirage15–150.0529%23 Feb →
mirage13–110.0424%23 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0823%15 Feb →
ancient13–6-0.0348%15 Feb →
dust213–70.0046%15 Feb →
dust215–15-0.0317%15 Feb →
inferno11–130.0329%15 Feb →
mirage13–10-0.0412%15 Feb →
inferno4–130.0450%15 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.0221%14 Feb →
train13–90.0627%14 Feb →
ancient9–130.0015%14 Feb →
dust25–13-0.0519%14 Feb →
anubis13–90.0522%14 Feb →
nuke7–130.0028%14 Feb →
mirage13–6-0.0120%14 Feb →
inferno13–6-0.0327%14 Feb →
ancient9–20.0126%13 Feb →
mirage16–130.0518%8 Feb →
mirage13–80.0426%8 Feb →
mirage13–50.0519%8 Feb →
inferno13–100.0521%8 Feb →
inferno13–90.0830%7 Feb →
dust213–80.0522%7 Feb →
ancient13–110.0421%7 Feb →
train9–00.0150%7 Feb →
dust213–9-0.0019%5 Feb →
mirage13–6-0.0223%5 Feb →
mirage7–130.0222%2 Feb →
ancient11–130.0413%2 Feb →
inferno13–50.1118%2 Feb →
nuke9–130.0213%2 Feb →
anubis10–130.0421%31 Jan →
ancient13–50.0517%31 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO500 Matches13-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.