robbert loggia

robbert loggia — CS2 Stats

KE76561199234508522[U:1:1274242794]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,945Tracked matches41%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,399Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,148 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,945 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 64 days played since 22 Nov 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,820 +242 22 Nov25 Apr · 16 days played
21,70624,281peak 24,28122 Nov25 Apr
Faceit ELO: 2,148 +0 10 Sept17 Sept · 2 observations
2,1482,148peak 2,14810 Sept17 Sept
24,281Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,148Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
64Days played since 2025-11-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,148
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 352 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-10
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 10 Sep 2026 and 18 Sep 2026.

Measured 10 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,915), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate45.0%48.3%51.0%6.0% short
Shot accuracy0.2%13.2%13.7%13.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.101.071.09meets
Match win rate45.7%46.9%48.4%2.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGrobbert loggiaFACEITLevel 9 · 2,148 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,148csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning49
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46513Last 10046%Win rateLWWLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −1.4pp headshot accuracy · +69ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 619ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 624ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility6.5
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 584ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning4.9
Utility6.5
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time602ms−4ms
first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 602ms
Headshot accuracy15.7%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 15.0% → last ⅓ avg 15.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 9–3 · poseidon, 7 May
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · nuke, 4 Apr
406msFastest reaction time · 9–3 · vertigo, 23 Nov
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 1 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
412In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 70% over 20infernoWeakest map · 15% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2014670%0.04
ancientB147750%0.01
infernoD1321115%-0.02
overpassB115645%-0.01
vertigoB115645%0.02
mirageD93633%0.01
anubisA95456%0.01
train41325%0.02
dust231233%0.02
poseidon21150%0.13
cache110100%-0.02
sanctum110100%0.10
alpine1010%0.04
warden1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (15% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

60,700Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
3,363Matches
45.7%Match win rate
45.0%Headshot %
0.2%Shot accuracy
7,869MVPs
1,399Hours (in match)
3,675Bombs planted
933Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4722,240
AWP3,669
MP92,643
MAC-102,085
P901,312
Knife1,258

Lifetime map wins

6,720nuke
3,306inferno
2,670vertigo
1,346train
1,226dust2
86office
28italy
17ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,170Matches
51%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
87.3ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage25948%1.1216.3
Nuke22053%1.3218.4
Anubis17745%1.1116.9
Ancient16452%1.1818.2
Inferno11348%1.2016.8
Overpass10456%1.1617.2
Vertigo6961%1.2916.9
Train3158%1.3217.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.1%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.5%Spray accuracy
83.9%Counter-strafing
11.6°Preaim
584msReaction time
34.2%T opening success
34.2%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
10.41HE damage / grenade
10.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.1969% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

15% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage2–60.0122%3 Jul
cache13–2-0.028%20 Jun
nuke13–50.0711%25 May
nuke8–13-0.0411%19 May
inferno8–13-0.0015%14 May
inferno7–13-0.059%13 May
nuke9–130.0115%10 May
ancient9–130.0117%9 May
poseidon9–30.2216%7 May
dust213–110.0112%5 May
ancient11–13-0.0219%4 May
mirage9–13-0.048%1 May
anubis13–70.0126%25 Apr
overpass13–20.0419%24 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0020%24 Apr
inferno13–11-0.049%22 Apr
inferno1–10.000%21 Apr
ancient13–50.0820%18 Apr
anubis13–10-0.0016%18 Apr
vertigo0–4-0.1313%17 Apr
nuke7–9-0.0923%16 Apr
vertigo12–12-0.0121%15 Apr
anubis7–130.0120%13 Apr
mirage5–13-0.013%12 Apr
poseidon3–90.0343%10 Apr
inferno9–13-0.073%10 Apr
inferno6–13-0.058%10 Apr
sanctum9–60.1018%10 Apr
anubis13–9-0.0519%9 Apr
nuke13–70.1119%9 Apr
mirage9–130.018%9 Apr
dust24–130.0819%9 Apr
nuke13–110.1029%5 Apr
ancient13–40.0216%5 Apr
anubis11–130.0416%5 Apr
mirage13–10.0419%4 Apr
nuke13–30.0244%4 Apr
ancient13–40.0210%4 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0222%3 Apr
mirage13–00.0922%1 Apr
vertigo4–130.0213%29 Mar
nuke13–40.009%29 Mar
vertigo11–13-0.036%29 Mar
vertigo6–13-0.017%29 Mar
vertigo13–80.0321%29 Mar
vertigo13–50.0840%28 Mar
alpine3–130.0425%28 Mar
warden8–130.0522%28 Mar
nuke16–130.0622%28 Mar
inferno11–130.0618%28 Mar
nuke13–10.1425%27 Mar
anubis13–80.1028%27 Mar
nuke13–40.0520%15 Mar
vertigo13–110.0618%15 Mar
inferno2–13-0.0214%13 Mar
inferno3–9-0.1514%12 Mar
anubis8–130.0313%14 Feb
nuke16–130.0520%14 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0320%13 Feb
overpass3–13-0.0422%7 Feb
overpass13–90.0518%4 Feb
nuke13–90.0341%3 Feb
ancient13–80.0325%3 Feb
mirage13–16-0.0424%30 Jan
anubis13–6-0.0214%30 Jan
inferno13–50.0825%30 Jan
anubis12–160.0016%26 Jan
overpass16–19-0.0313%25 Jan
nuke3–130.0216%17 Jan
ancient13–10.0416%17 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0321%16 Jan
train11–130.0011%12 Jan
ancient13–160.0011%2 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0313%31 Dec
overpass13–100.0319%27 Dec
overpass1–13-0.033%22 Dec
overpass3–9-0.1211%20 Dec
dust210–13-0.0313%18 Dec
ancient13–90.0422%16 Dec
overpass11–130.0111%15 Dec
nuke9–60.0916%11 Dec
nuke16–130.0517%9 Dec
train13–50.0321%9 Dec
vertigo9–50.1029%7 Dec
mirage13–80.0316%3 Dec
train9–13-0.0231%1 Dec
overpass13–9-0.0313%30 Nov
overpass15–15-0.0311%30 Nov
vertigo4–9-0.0012%28 Nov
ancient7–13-0.0714%27 Nov
nuke13–10.1210%26 Nov
ancient4–13-0.057%26 Nov
train11–130.0614%23 Nov
nuke15–150.0216%23 Nov
vertigo9–30.118%23 Nov
ancient13–80.1116%23 Nov
overpass13–100.044%22 Nov
inferno11–13-0.0119%22 Nov
nuke13–40.0328%22 Nov
inferno10–130.0215%22 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →