𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓭𝓲𝓮⚡ — CS2 Stats

LT76561199231965352[U:1:1271699624]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,151Tracked matches48%Win rate2022Tracked since

3,307Hours in CS32Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.8 StrongPositional Player

Premier CS Rating25,261Top 10% of 215,558 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#19731 of 261653 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,182 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,261 -1,910 29 Aug – 14 Nov · 17 days played

Faceit ELO: 2,182 +0 29 Aug – 19 Oct · 6 observations

27,704Peak Premier in tracked matches

2,182Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

33Days played since 2026-08-29

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,182
0 over 30 days · steady
Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 318 to go
Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
Level 10 first seen 2026-08-29
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

2,332 below peak (27,593)
-1,941 over 30 days · declining
-1,910 over 90 days
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,739 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-08-29
Pink band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

Metric	Last 30	Previous 30	Change
Matches	56	69	−13
Win rate	38%	39%	−2pp
K/D	0.97	1.05	−0.08
Headshot %	65%	70%	−6pp

Measured 19 Oct 2026 → 15 Nov 2026; previous 20 Sep 2026 → 19 Oct 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=31,884), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	55.3%	50.9%
Shot accuracy	8.7%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.42	1.09
Match win rate	28.8%	48.4%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90

Positioning79

Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–54–3Last 10043%Win rateWLWLWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −3.2pp headshot accuracy · −59ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.05
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 444ms

Last 10

6–4 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.05
Avg headshot accuracy 17%
Avg reaction 435ms

Last 20

9–11 · 45% win rate
Avg rating 0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 19%
Avg reaction 464ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim9.0

Utility5.8

Positioning7.9

Opening Duels6.5

Clutch4.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like donk 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 66% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0

Positioning7.9

Utility5.8

Mechanics6.9

Opening Duels7.6

Win Impact4.4

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time478ms−9ms

first ⅓ avg 487ms → last ⅓ avg 478ms

Headshot accuracy19.7%+1.0%

first ⅓ avg 18.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–5 · nuke, 4 Nov →

40%Best headshot accuracy · 8–0 · dust2, 2 Nov →

344msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · anubis, 11 Nov →

13–1Biggest win · dust2, 29 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak

8–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 15infernoWeakest map · 14% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	25	12–13	48%	0.05
ancient	C	20	8–12	40%	0.03
nuke	A	15	9–6	60%	0.04
anubis	B	12	6–6	50%	0.02
mirage	C	12	5–7	42%	0.03
inferno	D	7	1–6	14%	-0.01
cache	D	5	1–4	20%	0.03
vertigo	—	4	1–3	25%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

218,995Lifetime kills

1.42K/D · Top 10% of Level 10 players

5,710Matches

28.8%Match win rate

55.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 10 players

8.7%Shot accuracy

13,520MVPs

2,632Hours (in match)

1,798Bombs planted

932Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4786,339

AWP34,016

M4A4 / M4A1-S29,836

Desert Eagle20,288

P2000 / USP-S12,570

Glock-185,123

SSG 084,352

Galil AR2,940

MP92,188

FAMAS2,074

Lifetime map wins

11,185dust2

3,448inferno

2,982nuke

1,001vertigo

444train

16office

14ar_shoots

9safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

539Matches

54%Win rate

1.58Avg K/D

106.9ADR

50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win

30%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	117	51%	1.47	21.1
Dust2	106	56%	1.62	22.4
Anubis	83	58%	1.57	20.6
Inferno	57	49%	1.53	21.6
Nuke	50	58%	1.55	21.5
Mirage	44	41%	1.36	22.6
Vertigo	16	75%	1.43	21.9
Train	6	33%	1.17	19.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy

39.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.2%Spray accuracy

80.9%Counter-strafing

7.3°Preaim

477msReaction time

66.2%T opening success

54.5%CT opening success

0.59Enemies flashed / flash

9.3%Flash assists

7.24HE damage / grenade

13.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	13–2	0.10	24%	14 Nov →
dust2	9–13	0.05	24%	14 Nov →
mirage	13–10	0.04	17%	14 Nov →
inferno	5–13	-0.04	10%	14 Nov →
mirage	13–6	0.13	14%	14 Nov →
anubis	13–6	0.03	10%	14 Nov →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	19%	14 Nov →
dust2	13–2	0.13	19%	13 Nov →
nuke	10–13	0.03	18%	13 Nov →
anubis	13–6	0.03	15%	13 Nov →
inferno	9–13	0.00	16%	12 Nov →
dust2	13–10	0.11	32%	12 Nov →
anubis	10–13	0.05	26%	12 Nov →
anubis	1–13	-0.05	16%	11 Nov →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	30%	11 Nov →
cache	5–13	-0.02	18%	11 Nov →
vertigo	13–9	0.02	8%	11 Nov →
anubis	25–23	0.03	16%	10 Nov →
ancient	9–13	0.05	21%	10 Nov →
nuke	7–13	0.00	19%	10 Nov →
nuke	13–10	0.07	20%	10 Nov →
nuke	7–13	-0.06	16%	8 Nov →
dust2	13–10	0.12	16%	5 Nov →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	11%	5 Nov →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	13%	5 Nov →
dust2	13–9	0.03	27%	4 Nov →
dust2	12–16	0.03	32%	4 Nov →
nuke	13–5	0.18	19%	4 Nov →
dust2	12–12	-0.04	24%	2 Nov →
dust2	8–0	0.10	40%	2 Nov →
dust2	19–17	0.05	24%	29 Oct →
dust2	13–1	0.11	18%	29 Oct →
anubis	6–13	0.06	15%	29 Oct →
ancient	13–8	0.06	17%	29 Oct →
vertigo	11–13	-0.01	26%	28 Oct →
mirage	8–1	0.10	21%	28 Oct →
ancient	16–14	0.03	15%	28 Oct →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	17%	28 Oct →
nuke	13–8	-0.00	13%	27 Oct →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	15%	27 Oct →
ancient	8–13	0.03	15%	26 Oct →
mirage	5–13	0.03	21%	26 Oct →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	21%	26 Oct →
nuke	13–11	0.06	26%	23 Oct →
dust2	12–12	-0.00	21%	23 Oct →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	28%	23 Oct →
cache	7–13	0.09	16%	21 Oct →
ancient	11–13	0.03	24%	21 Oct →
inferno	11–13	0.02	14%	18 Oct →
inferno	7–13	0.01	18%	18 Oct →
inferno	14–16	-0.03	17%	18 Oct →
dust2	13–11	-0.00	23%	15 Oct →
anubis	9–13	0.03	14%	15 Oct →
anubis	13–10	0.08	16%	15 Oct →
ancient	13–6	0.06	21%	15 Oct →
ancient	13–10	0.13	22%	13 Oct →
nuke	2–13	-0.01	23%	13 Oct →
ancient	11–13	0.03	11%	12 Oct →
cache	13–9	0.13	16%	9 Oct →
ancient	13–2	0.10	24%	9 Oct →
mirage	15–15	0.04	12%	9 Oct →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	23%	9 Oct →
nuke	13–6	0.07	19%	8 Oct →
nuke	13–6	0.07	26%	8 Oct →
anubis	13–8	0.01	22%	8 Oct →
dust2	13–5	0.03	31%	6 Oct →
vertigo	7–13	0.05	22%	6 Oct →
cache	7–13	0.01	24%	6 Oct →
ancient	10–13	0.01	16%	2 Oct →
dust2	16–14	0.03	9%	2 Oct →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	11%	2 Oct →
dust2	4–13	0.10	15%	1 Oct →
mirage	16–13	0.03	14%	1 Oct →
anubis	15–19	-0.02	15%	1 Oct →
nuke	13–11	0.09	19%	1 Oct →
vertigo	11–13	0.03	25%	30 Sept →
ancient	9–13	0.03	16%	30 Sept →
ancient	14–16	0.06	25%	30 Sept →
dust2	11–13	0.01	29%	30 Sept →
nuke	8–13	0.01	16%	30 Sept →
nuke	13–8	0.10	11%	29 Sept →
dust2	7–13	0.09	12%	29 Sept →
mirage	16–13	-0.06	19%	28 Sept →
inferno	11–13	-0.03	19%	28 Sept →
dust2	13–3	0.13	29%	23 Sept →
ancient	5–13	-0.04	17%	23 Sept →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	12%	23 Sept →
dust2	13–2	0.14	25%	23 Sept →
dust2	7–13	0.15	26%	22 Sept →
mirage	1–13	0.02	24%	22 Sept →
ancient	13–11	-0.00	17%	21 Sept →
nuke	19–16	0.05	21%	21 Sept →
inferno	13–7	0.03	20%	20 Sept →
dust2	1–5	-0.09	21%	20 Sept →
mirage	7–13	0.07	11%	19 Sept →
cache	5–13	-0.07	22%	19 Sept →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	14%	17 Sept →
ancient	13–3	0.13	20%	17 Sept →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	22%	17 Sept →
anubis	5–13	-0.09	17%	17 Sept →