d1nked

d1nked — CS2 Stats

GB76561199230218902[U:1:1269953174]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

355Tracked matches53%Win rate2024Tracked since
323Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.3 LearningPositional Player
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Sep 2026 (50 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+7Tracked matches · now 355
−10.0ppWin rate · 63.3% → 53.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,633 -1,432 20 Oct – 18 Jan · 8 days played
10,43812,065peak 12,06520 Oct18 Jan
12,377Peak Premier in tracked matches
49Days played since 2025-10-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate43.1%41.8%42.7%meets
Shot accuracy0.2%12.2%11.2%11.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.670.980.990.32 short
Match win rate46.8%43.3%43.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGd1nkedFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim42
Positioning41
Utility15

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–46–6Last 10048%Win rateLWLLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.3pp headshot accuracy · −52ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 540ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim4.2
Utility1.5
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 590ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 58% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.2
Positioning4.1
Utility1.5
Mechanics1.9
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact6.1

Composite 3.3/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time587ms−123ms
first ⅓ avg 710ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms
Headshot accuracy13.5%−3.6%
first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 13.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 9–2 · nuke, 28 Dec →
71%Best headshot accuracy · 9–0 · inferno, 2 Jan →
430msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · cache, 31 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 7 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
5–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 61% over 18overpassWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC3914–2536%-0.02
infernoA1811–761%0.00
anubisA169–756%0.00
cacheB105–550%0.01
overpassD51–420%-0.06
poseidon—32–167%-0.01
ancient—20–20%0.06
mirage—21–150%0.01
dust2—11–0100%0.05
stronghold—11–0100%0.06
alpine—11–0100%-0.02
warden—11–0100%0.05
sanctum—11–0100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

10,933Lifetime kills
0.67K/D
1,194Matches
46.8%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 3 players
43.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
0.2%Shot accuracy
1,975MVPs
323Hours (in match)
1,354Bombs planted
226Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,944nuke
420inferno
367train
227vertigo
207dust2
134italy
115office
25militia

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

4Matches
0%Win rate
0.24Avg K/D
38.8ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
0Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke20%0.182.5
Mirage10%0.507.0
Vertigo10%0.122.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.3%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
58.4%Counter-strafing
11.7°Preaim
590msReaction time
35.5%T opening success
23.2%CT opening success
0.22Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
5.66HE damage / grenade
0.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.2573% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2225 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.4592% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke8–13-0.058%24 Sept →
dust213–30.0523%24 Sept →
cache13–16-0.0317%22 Sept →
ancient6–130.0016%22 Sept →
ancient2–40.1215%22 Sept →
inferno9–10.027%13 Sept →
nuke7–9-0.0914%11 Sept →
nuke5–90.0314%6 Sept →
anubis13–70.078%5 Sept →
cache10–00.015%5 Sept →
inferno9–50.0610%3 Sept →
nuke10–130.0013%2 Sept →
cache3–130.0614%2 Sept →
overpass13–9-0.0322%31 Aug →
nuke13–30.0211%31 Aug →
nuke13–20.108%31 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0621%31 Aug →
cache13–50.0210%30 Aug →
nuke5–9-0.0226%29 Aug →
cache7–130.036%29 Aug →
cache13–50.049%29 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.038%27 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0112%7 Jun →
anubis13–11-0.0017%7 Jun →
cache13–80.0111%29 May →
anubis13–20.0611%29 May →
nuke13–8-0.0113%29 May →
cache8–13-0.0113%16 May →
nuke5–9-0.1311%8 Apr →
overpass10–13-0.0417%16 Mar →
nuke4–9-0.1514%2 Mar →
anubis8–13-0.0417%21 Feb →
anubis11–130.0226%21 Feb →
inferno9–20.1125%19 Feb →
inferno0–13-0.110%8 Feb →
anubis13–20.0213%8 Feb →
nuke7–20.0828%7 Feb →
nuke13–10.0227%7 Feb →
anubis13–60.0223%7 Feb →
nuke9–5-0.135%7 Feb →
nuke1–9-0.0515%6 Feb →
nuke7–9-0.0422%6 Feb →
inferno13–70.0110%1 Feb →
anubis2–13-0.018%1 Feb →
poseidon3–9-0.048%29 Jan →
poseidon9–6-0.0325%24 Jan →
stronghold13–50.0621%24 Jan →
alpine13–2-0.0215%24 Jan →
anubis13–100.0814%24 Jan →
anubis13–50.0318%24 Jan →
warden13–90.0520%24 Jan →
poseidon9–70.0311%24 Jan →
sanctum9–5-0.0323%24 Jan →
anubis12–12-0.0314%24 Jan →
mirage13–40.0418%18 Jan →
anubis12–12-0.0618%10 Jan →
nuke5–9-0.0125%9 Jan →
inferno8–13-0.066%6 Jan →
nuke10–13-0.0227%6 Jan →
anubis13–6-0.0410%4 Jan →
inferno9–00.1471%2 Jan →
inferno9–70.0122%2 Jan →
inferno9–30.067%2 Jan →
inferno4–9-0.1310%2 Jan →
inferno9–40.086%2 Jan →
inferno6–90.1017%2 Jan →
nuke9–6-0.0624%2 Jan →
nuke7–9-0.0919%1 Jan →
nuke8–80.0116%31 Dec →
nuke2–9-0.1318%30 Dec →
nuke9–50.1612%30 Dec →
anubis8–13-0.0011%28 Dec →
nuke3–13-0.0915%28 Dec →
nuke9–20.2316%28 Dec →
nuke13–9-0.0118%27 Dec →
nuke9–30.0819%27 Dec →
nuke5–9-0.0132%27 Dec →
nuke7–9-0.0823%26 Dec →
nuke9–00.2015%26 Dec →
inferno10–13-0.0821%20 Dec →
inferno13–11-0.0718%26 Nov →
inferno11–130.0012%20 Nov →
overpass0–6-0.090%20 Nov →
inferno13–6-0.0127%4 Nov →
inferno13–1-0.0115%4 Nov →
nuke8–13-0.0519%4 Nov →
nuke15–15-0.069%2 Nov →
nuke5–13-0.0314%2 Nov →
anubis13–11-0.0233%1 Nov →
nuke11–13-0.0216%1 Nov →
nuke12–12-0.0415%1 Nov →
nuke13–7-0.0214%1 Nov →
nuke5–9-0.0426%27 Oct →
nuke4–9-0.1220%27 Oct →
nuke9–6-0.0411%24 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.019%24 Oct →
overpass6–13-0.0919%23 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0711%20 Oct →
overpass1–13-0.079%20 Oct →
nuke8–8-0.0832%15 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.