✪ LeWi´S ツ

✪ LeWi´S ツ — CS2 Stats

NE76561199226414584[U:1:1266148856]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

618Tracked matches46%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,981Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,168Top 25% of 205,052 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#40208 of 252407 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Oct 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,168 -1,263 19 Aug – 2 Oct · 10 days played
22,81124,431peak 24,43119 Aug2 Oct
25,000Peak Premier in tracked matches
31Days played since 2026-08-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,263 below peak (24,431)
  • -716 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,832 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,918), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate40.1%43.7%44.8%4.7% short
Shot accuracy12.1%12.0%12.4%0.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.191.021.03above
Match win rate49.3%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪ LeWi´S ツFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER23,168 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning69
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–35–15Last 10050%Win rateTWWWLWLLTT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −2.0pp headshot accuracy · −16ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 676ms

Last 10

  • 4–3–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 631ms

Last 20

  • 10–6–4 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 639ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim6.0
Utility6.2
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 80% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 80% on T to 44% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 603ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning6.9
Utility6.2
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels6.7
Win Impact3.7

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time594ms+24ms
first ⅓ avg 570ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy14.9%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 11–5 · mirage, 20 Sept →
34%Best headshot accuracy · 11–5 · mirage, 20 Sept →
320msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · overpass, 24 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 24 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
11–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 71% over 7infernoWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA3219–1359%0.03
mirageC2310–1343%0.03
dust2S107–370%0.02
infernoD81–713%-0.02
nukeB84–450%0.03
overpassS75–271%0.02
anubis—40–40%0.04
vertigo—31–233%0.04
ancient—20–20%0.15
office—22–0100%0.06
train—11–0100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

56,760Lifetime kills
1.19K/D · Top 25% of Level 5 players
2,574Matches
49.3%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 5 players
40.1%Headshot %
12.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
8,953MVPs
1,034Hours (in match)
2,629Bombs planted
675Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4719,636
AWP6,182
MAC-101,611
P901,225
MP71,103

Lifetime map wins

4,447inferno
2,952dust2
2,169nuke
783vertigo
639office
551lake
429train
173cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

55Matches
60%Win rate
1.45Avg K/D
—ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.4%Headshot accuracy
33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.7%Spray accuracy
75.9%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
603msReaction time
80.2%T opening success
43.6%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
16.47HE damage / grenade
9.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache12–12-0.0522%16 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0222%3 Oct →
inferno13–50.037%3 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.027%3 Oct →
mirage7–130.0015%3 Oct →
mirage13–110.0415%2 Oct →
overpass3–13-0.0315%2 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0114%2 Oct →
nuke12–120.0213%2 Oct →
dust212–120.0519%2 Oct →
overpass13–20.108%2 Oct →
cache16–12-0.0011%2 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0313%1 Oct →
overpass13–10.1125%1 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0420%1 Oct →
dust213–50.0223%1 Oct →
mirage6–130.0714%30 Sept →
nuke12–120.0622%29 Sept →
mirage13–100.0510%29 Sept →
overpass13–11-0.0123%28 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0323%28 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0418%28 Sept →
cache9–130.0331%28 Sept →
mirage6–130.016%28 Sept →
cache13–60.0312%28 Sept →
mirage9–130.016%26 Sept →
cache11–130.0115%26 Sept →
mirage11–130.0112%26 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0411%26 Sept →
cache13–80.0316%26 Sept →
ancient8–130.0913%26 Sept →
nuke10–80.077%26 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.035%26 Sept →
dust26–70.1127%26 Sept →
dust213–7-0.1015%26 Sept →
cache13–20.0023%26 Sept →
dust213–110.0210%25 Sept →
mirage13–100.1913%25 Sept →
cache11–130.0318%25 Sept →
nuke13–40.1419%25 Sept →
mirage12–120.0619%25 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0020%25 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0420%25 Sept →
overpass0–13-0.040%24 Sept →
dust213–00.0718%24 Sept →
nuke12–12-0.0421%23 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0214%23 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0116%23 Sept →
cache13–40.0527%22 Sept →
vertigo6–130.0820%22 Sept →
mirage13–1-0.0127%22 Sept →
mirage13–30.0515%22 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0029%21 Sept →
cache12–12-0.009%21 Sept →
mirage12–120.0516%21 Sept →
office13–6-0.0124%20 Sept →
overpass10–4-0.0512%20 Sept →
mirage11–50.2134%20 Sept →
inferno15–150.0511%20 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0111%20 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0512%19 Sept →
ancient11–130.2019%17 Sept →
cache12–120.0915%17 Sept →
anubis11–130.0921%16 Sept →
vertigo13–70.0815%16 Sept →
overpass13–70.048%16 Sept →
dust213–80.0012%16 Sept →
cache1–13-0.0413%11 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.0710%10 Sept →
anubis10–130.1318%9 Sept →
inferno12–120.0818%9 Sept →
cache8–130.0819%7 Sept →
mirage13–70.0621%4 Sept →
office13–60.1318%4 Sept →
cache13–30.1117%4 Sept →
cache13–110.1327%4 Sept →
cache13–20.109%4 Sept →
train13–80.0711%3 Sept →
cache13–2-0.014%3 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0319%3 Sept →
cache13–90.0413%3 Sept →
cache13–10.149%3 Sept →
cache13–110.0227%3 Sept →
cache12–120.0115%2 Sept →
cache13–90.0215%1 Sept →
cache12–12-0.0324%31 Aug →
dust28–130.0017%29 Aug →
dust24–2-0.0210%29 Aug →
mirage10–130.0322%29 Aug →
cache13–60.0519%29 Aug →
vertigo12–12-0.0522%28 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0216%28 Aug →
nuke13–80.0315%27 Aug →
anubis4–130.037%27 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0311%23 Aug →
mirage5–130.007%19 Aug →
cache13–80.1216%19 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0820%19 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.1322%19 Aug →
cache13–6-0.0110%19 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.