🔱Jacek Pierdolando — CS2 Stats

BQ76561199215518781[U:1:1255253053]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,501Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since

4,260Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport

Premier CS Rating25,679Top 10% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#13977 of 225275 tracked

FaceitLevel 6 · 1,184 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Sep 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,501 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 30 days played since 11 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,679 +5,913 19 Jul – 6 Sept · 23 days played

25,679Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,184Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

30Days played since 2026-07-11

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,184
Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 17 to go
Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
Level 5 first seen 2026-09-06
Level 4 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 25,679
+4,391 over 30 days · improving
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,321 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-09-06
Pink band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,393), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 6 median	Level 7 median	vs Level 7
Headshot rate	45.8%	44.8%	45.7%	meets
Shot accuracy	11.6%	12.4%	12.7%	1.1% short
Kill/death ratio	1.07	1.04	1.05	meets
Match win rate	51.3%	45.2%	45.7%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77

Positioning35

Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–52–1Last 10047%Win rateWLWLWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +3.8pp headshot accuracy · −16ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating -0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 23%
Avg reaction 612ms

Last 10

6–4 · 60% win rate
Avg rating -0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 20%
Avg reaction 599ms

Last 20

12–8 · 60% win rate
Avg rating -0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 607ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim7.7

Utility6.1

Positioning3.5

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch5.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 595ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7

Positioning3.5

Utility6.1

Mechanics7.3

Opening Duels0.3

Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03

Reaction time600ms−68ms

first ⅓ avg 668ms → last ⅓ avg 600ms

Headshot accuracy18.3%−2.2%

first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 11–13 · mirage, 16 Aug →

42%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · nuke, 31 Jul →

352msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · cache, 24 Aug →

13–1Biggest win · dust2, 23 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak

10–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 70% over 10cacheWeakest map · 35% over 20

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	26	14–12	54%	-0.01
cache	C	20	7–13	35%	-0.01
dust2	C	17	6–11	35%	-0.03
anubis	C	13	5–8	38%	-0.02
ancient	S	10	7–3	70%	0.00
nuke	B	8	4–4	50%	-0.00
inferno	A	5	3–2	60%	-0.01
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

104,816Lifetime kills

1.07K/D · Top 50% of Level 6 players

4,873Matches

51.3%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 6 players

45.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players

11.6%Shot accuracy

14,919MVPs

2,053Hours (in match)

5,926Bombs planted

1,303Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4735,863

M4A4 / M4A1-S18,854

AWP11,983

Desert Eagle7,279

P2000 / USP-S6,475

Glock-184,691

MP92,360

Galil AR2,122

MAC-101,817

SSG 081,769

Lifetime map wins

8,407dust2

5,773nuke

4,730inferno

1,446vertigo

937train

410lake

165office

96safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

678Matches

50%Win rate

1.17Avg K/D

74.3ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win

32%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	51	61%	1.00	15.4
Ancient	17	35%	0.88	13.2
Nuke	14	86%	1.16	17.3
Anubis	14	29%	0.85	13.7
Inferno	13	31%	0.82	12.7
Dust2	13	54%	1.25	16.5
Train	5	60%	1.11	18.4
Overpass	4	0%	0.64	11.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.3%Headshot accuracy

35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.9%Spray accuracy

82.9%Counter-strafing

8.4°Preaim

595msReaction time

19.9%T opening success

32.6%CT opening success

0.52Enemies flashed / flash

7.5%Flash assists

13.49HE damage / grenade

11.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 19.9011% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–10	-0.06	15%	27 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.05	13%	26 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.02	31%	26 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	18%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.03	38%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–5	-0.08	11%	25 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	23%	24 Aug →
cache	1–13	-0.09	25%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–2	-0.00	16%	24 Aug →
anubis	11–5	-0.05	16%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–1	-0.08	39%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.01	0%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.02	9%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–1	-0.03	25%	23 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.06	17%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.01	19%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.01	9%	23 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	10%	23 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.03	26%	22 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	12%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.03	9%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.07	18%	22 Aug →
cache	0–13	-0.03	10%	22 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.07	23%	21 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.00	23%	21 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.04	28%	21 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.09	35%	21 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	14%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.04	23%	20 Aug →
inferno	16–14	-0.03	10%	20 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.06	12%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	11%	20 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.10	18%	19 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	16%	19 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.01	21%	18 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	19%	18 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.01	19%	18 Aug →
ancient	16–14	-0.01	15%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.07	18%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.00	14%	17 Aug →
cache	16–14	-0.05	19%	17 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.10	13%	16 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.03	13%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.06	9%	16 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.04	22%	16 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.05	24%	16 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.03	16%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.01	13%	16 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.04	28%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.01	12%	13 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.05	16%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.02	17%	11 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	10%	10 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.07	13%	10 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.07	17%	9 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	36%	9 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.07	23%	4 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.06	11%	4 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.05	13%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.03	18%	2 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.05	42%	31 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.07	40%	30 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.01	15%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.06	16%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.06	19%	26 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.05	20%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.04	21%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.00	17%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.04	27%	26 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	25%	25 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	21%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.00	18%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.03	33%	25 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.02	21%	25 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.02	27%	25 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.00	24%	25 Jul →
dust2	16–12	0.02	19%	25 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.05	19%	19 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.09	13%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	23%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–1	0.08	11%	19 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.03	13%	19 Jul →
cache	13–16	0.00	18%	19 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	26%	19 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	29%	18 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	14%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.00	21%	18 Jul →
cache	1–13	-0.08	27%	18 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.06	19%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.00	20%	18 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.02	17%	18 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.00	15%	17 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.08	20%	17 Jul →
overpass	13–11	-0.01	20%	17 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	19%	15 Jul →
anubis	4–13	0.04	17%	14 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.05	36%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.03	25%	14 Jul →
anubis	12–16	-0.02	8%	12 Jul →
nuke	6–13	0.02	14%	11 Jul →