mhlamxtu — CS2 Stats

76561199210306052[U:1:1250040324]

424Tracked matches43%Win rate2022Tracked since
858Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingPassive Rifler
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning30
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47449Last 10047%Win rateLLWLLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.4
Aggression2.5
Utility5.5
Positioning3.0
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 43 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 34% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 638ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning3.0
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels0.4
Win Impact2.6

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time645ms−38ms
first ⅓ avg 683ms → last ⅓ avg 645ms
Headshot accuracy23.0%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 22.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — dust2 13–1
130Biggest win — inferno
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
108In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 83% over 6anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB51272453%0.01
dust2D2051525%0.00
cacheS64267%-0.03
nukeS65183%0.04
anubisD61517%0.00
ancient42250%-0.01
inferno42250%-0.00
office1010%-0.06
overpass1010%-0.08
vertigo110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

15,785Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
994Matches
42.8%Match win rate
48.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
7.1%Shot accuracy
2,214MVPs
444Hours (in match)
1,006Bombs planted
301Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,422dust2
1,170inferno
878nuke
413vertigo
204train
45lake
43italy
36office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

163Matches
50%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
70.4ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5353%1.1414.8
Dust23647%0.9613.9
Anubis2232%0.8913.4
Ancient1953%1.1416.4
Nuke1553%1.0312.8
Inferno956%0.8211.8
Cache475%1.4320.0
Vertigo250%0.9213.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.4%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.9%Spray accuracy
78.9%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
638msReaction time
17.6%T opening success
33.5%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
9.08HE damage / grenade
15.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 17.5969% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–13-0.0213%19 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0521%17 Aug
mirage13–80.0213%20 Jul
dust24–130.0139%11 Jul
mirage6–9-0.0021%3 Jul
cache8–13-0.0223%3 Jul
mirage13–50.0619%29 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0324%8 Jun
mirage13–11-0.029%8 Jun
ancient13–160.0010%8 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0221%21 May
anubis10–13-0.0413%17 May
mirage13–80.1130%14 May
cache13–11-0.1026%6 May
cache13–40.0224%4 May
cache13–110.0320%3 May
cache8–13-0.089%29 Apr
cache13–7-0.0211%29 Apr
mirage12–12-0.028%26 Apr
mirage12–120.0333%26 Apr
mirage13–40.0530%26 Apr
mirage13–40.0437%12 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0642%10 Apr
dust28–13-0.0411%8 Apr
mirage10–130.0124%8 Apr
dust210–130.0331%6 Apr
mirage11–130.0322%5 Apr
ancient13–90.0225%5 Apr
dust29–13-0.0135%5 Apr
mirage13–60.0547%4 Apr
mirage12–12-0.0224%4 Apr
mirage12–12-0.0413%3 Apr
dust27–13-0.1131%31 Mar
dust212–120.0529%31 Mar
dust26–13-0.0329%30 Mar
mirage13–70.0422%30 Mar
mirage13–90.0211%29 Mar
dust28–130.0142%26 Mar
dust213–110.0128%18 Mar
dust211–130.0134%18 Mar
inferno14–16-0.0532%18 Mar
anubis5–120.0422%16 Mar
dust29–130.0412%11 Mar
dust213–8-0.0125%11 Mar
nuke13–60.0920%1 Mar
mirage13–110.0926%1 Mar
dust213–60.0425%28 Feb
nuke13–110.0521%24 Feb
inferno11–130.0014%23 Feb
nuke13–100.0230%23 Feb
dust213–10.1246%22 Feb
nuke13–110.0013%10 Feb
dust29–13-0.0024%10 Feb
dust28–13-0.0019%5 Feb
anubis9–130.0314%4 Feb
mirage13–90.0020%28 Jan
dust29–13-0.0321%27 Jan
dust213–80.0410%24 Jan
anubis3–13-0.0821%24 Jan
anubis12–120.036%23 Jan
ancient9–13-0.0120%22 Jan
office3–13-0.0637%21 Jan
dust28–130.0012%21 Jan
mirage11–130.0121%21 Jan
inferno13–00.0617%20 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0324%19 Jan
mirage13–16-0.0721%19 Jan
mirage9–130.0726%11 Jan
mirage13–60.0641%11 Jan
mirage13–110.038%4 Jan
mirage13–20.0722%4 Jan
mirage4–13-0.0318%4 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0429%2 Jan
mirage13–90.0323%2 Jan
mirage12–12-0.0320%1 Jan
anubis13–100.0421%1 Jan
nuke13–70.0813%1 Jan
mirage4–13-0.0525%1 Jan
mirage13–40.0133%1 Jan
mirage13–30.0727%31 Dec
overpass10–13-0.0816%30 Dec
dust214–16-0.0511%30 Dec
inferno13–7-0.0317%30 Dec
mirage13–10-0.0628%30 Dec
mirage13–11-0.0115%30 Dec
mirage13–110.0220%27 Dec
mirage8–130.0529%27 Dec
mirage13–9-0.0533%27 Dec
ancient13–8-0.058%27 Dec
mirage7–13-0.0123%23 Dec
mirage13–60.0219%23 Dec
mirage12–12-0.0422%22 Dec
mirage13–30.0522%22 Dec
mirage8–13-0.0526%18 Dec
mirage12–12-0.0321%18 Dec
vertigo13–40.0223%17 Dec
mirage13–40.0519%16 Dec
mirage13–00.0736%16 Dec
mirage13–10.059%16 Dec
mirage13–50.0822%14 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →