stankmaster daniels — CS2 Stats
76561199207136470[U:1:1246870742]✓ No bans
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity
Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.
Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
Counter-strafing. 90% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.
Areas to improve
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D | 27 | 9–18 | 33% | -0.00 | |
| D | 18 | 6–12 | 33% | 0.01 | |
| A | 14 | 9–5 | 64% | 0.00 | |
| C | 10 | 4–6 | 40% | -0.01 | |
| A | 9 | 5–4 | 56% | -0.01 | |
| D | 9 | 2–7 | 22% | 0.01 | |
| D | 7 | 1–6 | 14% | 0.01 | |
| — | 3 | 1–2 | 33% | 0.06 | |
| — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | 0.04 | |
| — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | -0.03 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 246 | 54% | 1.06 | 15.7 |
| Ancient | 110 | 51% | 0.99 | 15.2 |
| Anubis | 101 | 55% | 1.00 | 14.2 |
| Inferno | 72 | 49% | 1.08 | 15.2 |
| Dust2 | 66 | 48% | 1.11 | 15.1 |
| Vertigo | 53 | 38% | 0.88 | 13.8 |
| Nuke | 52 | 48% | 0.99 | 15.1 |
| Overpass | 37 | 43% | 0.99 | 16.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 22.3824% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3–13 | 0.03 | 18% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.03 | 15% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.01 | 19% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.00 | 13% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.02 | 30% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.01 | 18% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.03 | 22% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.00 | 12% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.04 | 14% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.05 | 15% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.02 | 25% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.12 | 12% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.03 | 8% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.02 | 20% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.05 | 10% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.02 | 23% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 0–13 | -0.04 | 19% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.01 | 16% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.05 | 11% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.03 | 24% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 14–16 | 0.01 | 16% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.03 | 17% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.06 | 13% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.04 | 16% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.10 | 18% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.03 | 26% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.05 | 24% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 13–16 | 0.03 | 16% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.03 | 15% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.03 | 15% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.01 | 8% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.05 | 11% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.08 | 11% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.00 | 21% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 16–12 | 0.07 | 18% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.04 | 12% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.03 | 13% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.02 | 17% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.10 | 24% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.01 | 12% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.01 | 8% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.02 | 8% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.03 | 27% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.03 | 17% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.02 | 14% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.01 | 22% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.07 | 26% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.07 | 13% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.08 | 25% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.02 | 17% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.03 | 18% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.00 | 21% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.02 | 24% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.03 | 19% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.04 | 14% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.05 | 27% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.08 | 20% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.07 | 12% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 14–16 | -0.04 | 21% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.03 | 20% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.03 | 15% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.03 | 22% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.03 | 22% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 12–12 | -0.01 | 12% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.12 | 16% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.08 | 11% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.04 | 12% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.05 | 15% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.04 | 14% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.06 | 15% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.03 | 6% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.00 | 24% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.02 | 27% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.00 | 12% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.00 | 29% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.01 | 11% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.02 | 10% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.01 | 20% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.01 | 18% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.00 | 21% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 3–13 | 0.03 | 26% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.01 | 4% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.01 | 14% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | 0.07 | 17% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.01 | 14% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.08 | 19% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.00 | 19% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.01 | 19% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 16–13 | -0.01 | 14% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.07 | 18% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.07 | 27% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.02 | 9% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.08 | 20% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.04 | 11% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.15 | 17% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 13–3 | -0.02 | 18% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.04 | 25% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 2–10 | -0.03 | 25% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.03 | 21% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.00 | 23% | 26 Jul → |
Match data via Leetify.