seanwang621

seanwang621 — CS2 Stats

US76561199186511286[U:1:1226245558]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

301Tracked matches63%Win rate2023Tracked since
168Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,511Purple band · top ~18.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,511 +4,646 21 Jun – 30 Sept · 18 days played
12,86517,626peak 17,62621 Jun30 Sept
17,744Peak Premier in tracked matches
44Days played since 2026-06-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 115 below peak (17,626)
  • +672 over 30 days · improving
  • +4,177 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,489 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,879), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate54.0%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy2.4%12.4%12.7%10.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.831.031.050.22 short
Match win rate35.2%45.2%45.7%10.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGseanwang621FACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER17,511 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning59
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–39–5Last 10056%Win rateWTTLWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +6.7pp headshot accuracy · +48ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–1–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 639ms

Last 10

  • 4–4–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 654ms

Last 20

  • 11–6–3 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 630ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility5.1
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 616ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning5.9
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact9.3

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time610ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 657ms → last ⅓ avg 610ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%−6.9%
first ⅓ avg 25.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 13–4 · fachwerk, 24 Jul →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · cache, 3 Jul →
414msFastest reaction time · 4–9 · mirage, 14 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · vertigo, 17 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
12–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 15anubisWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2212–1055%0.01
ancientA169–756%0.01
dust2S1510–567%0.01
cacheB105–550%0.01
infernoB105–550%0.01
nukeA95–456%0.01
anubisC83–538%0.00
vertigo—32–167%-0.02
train—21–150%-0.00
shelter—21–150%0.00
overpass—11–0100%0.04
fachwerk—11–0100%0.24
boulder—11–0100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

9,706Lifetime kills
0.83K/D
554Matches
35.2%Match win rate
54.0%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 6 players
2.4%Shot accuracy
1,063MVPs
168Hours (in match)
343Bombs planted
85Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

865dust2
621inferno
323nuke
117vertigo
51train
4cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

45Matches
58%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
75.5ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1669%1.1014.9
Dust2956%1.1720.0
Ancient729%0.8713.1
Anubis425%0.7611.8
Cache4100%1.3217.5
Nuke367%0.8716.7
Inferno250%0.9312.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
40.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.0%Spray accuracy
82.6%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
616msReaction time
38.8%T opening success
43.5%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
9.36HE damage / grenade
10.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.7657% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–50.0014%2 Oct →
train12–120.0030%2 Oct →
ancient12–120.0213%2 Oct →
anubis9–130.0220%30 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0125%29 Sept →
mirage6–3-0.0215%26 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0222%26 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0115%26 Sept →
ancient13–60.0116%26 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0432%24 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.044%16 Sept →
dust216–13-0.0316%1 Sept →
nuke13–80.0414%31 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.048%31 Aug →
mirage22–190.0216%30 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0812%29 Aug →
mirage8–130.0220%26 Aug →
dust213–50.0514%26 Aug →
cache12–12-0.0418%26 Aug →
cache13–50.0513%26 Aug →
dust213–70.0424%26 Aug →
cache13–30.0718%25 Aug →
ancient7–130.0438%24 Aug →
anubis1–13-0.0613%24 Aug →
dust27–130.0018%24 Aug →
anubis13–16-0.0027%23 Aug →
inferno13–20.007%23 Aug →
mirage13–100.019%23 Aug →
ancient13–40.0224%23 Aug →
inferno8–80.047%23 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0213%19 Aug →
anubis13–60.0031%19 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0330%19 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0221%19 Aug →
mirage10–130.0718%17 Aug →
vertigo13–10.0428%17 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0610%17 Aug →
inferno13–60.029%16 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.015%16 Aug →
cache9–130.0318%16 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0314%15 Aug →
nuke13–100.0116%15 Aug →
cache13–80.0730%15 Aug →
dust213–70.0922%15 Aug →
ancient13–110.0615%14 Aug →
nuke0–9-0.0036%14 Aug →
mirage4–9-0.0726%14 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.0114%13 Aug →
anubis11–130.0023%13 Aug →
mirage7–130.0915%13 Aug →
dust213–80.0320%12 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0231%12 Aug →
mirage13–90.0019%12 Aug →
mirage13–110.1040%12 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0022%12 Aug →
mirage13–10.0626%9 Aug →
overpass13–110.0424%9 Aug →
train13–11-0.0139%9 Aug →
cache13–6-0.0629%7 Aug →
dust213–4-0.0134%6 Aug →
ancient9–130.0532%5 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0122%5 Aug →
ancient13–90.0230%5 Aug →
cache6–130.0226%4 Aug →
nuke13–160.0829%4 Aug →
mirage13–110.0329%4 Aug →
cache5–130.0213%4 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0314%3 Aug →
mirage4–130.0224%3 Aug →
dust213–70.1128%2 Aug →
ancient13–100.0524%2 Aug →
nuke13–110.0822%1 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0222%29 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0811%26 Jul →
anubis13–9-0.0120%26 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0337%26 Jul →
anubis13–30.1225%25 Jul →
vertigo5–13-0.0322%25 Jul →
nuke13–90.0233%25 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.0730%25 Jul →
shelter13–11-0.0216%24 Jul →
fachwerk13–40.2432%24 Jul →
boulder13–50.1037%24 Jul →
mirage13–20.1015%22 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0428%22 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0338%21 Jul →
inferno13–50.0122%17 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0414%17 Jul →
dust213–8-0.0428%11 Jul →
shelter8–130.0222%11 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0523%11 Jul →
ancient12–120.0825%5 Jul →
vertigo13–7-0.0723%5 Jul →
inferno16–140.0418%4 Jul →
cache13–10.0043%3 Jul →
inferno10–130.0221%28 Jun →
mirage13–11-0.0031%27 Jun →
inferno2–130.0722%21 Jun →
mirage8–13-0.0027%21 Jun →
mirage13–6-0.0127%20 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.