BLA$TER☁ — CS2 Stats
IL76561199182875876[U:1:1222610148]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,711), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 4 median | Level 5 median | vs Level 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 53.6% | 42.7% | 44.0% | above |
| Shot accuracy | 6.4% | 10.8% | 11.6% | 5.2% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.15 | 1.00 | 1.03 | above |
| Match win rate | 52.3% | 44.1% | 45.1% | above |
This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Player DNA
Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 59 | 44% | 0.95 | 14.9 |
| Anubis | 35 | 49% | 0.98 | 15.5 |
| Vertigo | 33 | 55% | 1.10 | 16.3 |
| Overpass | 25 | 80% | 1.00 | 16.0 |
| Inferno | 20 | 55% | 1.04 | 15.8 |
| Ancient | 12 | 42% | 1.05 | 16.1 |
| Nuke | 6 | 17% | 0.95 | 11.7 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.4212% — below the 40% mark we flag