Richiscooked

Richiscooked — CS2 Stats

BS76561199177507424[U:1:1217241696]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,236Tracked matches54%Win rate2021Tracked since
803Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating12,236Blue band · top ~43% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,441 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 22 days played since 26 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,236 +295 26 Jul16 Sept · 17 days played
8,87813,700peak 13,70026 Jul16 Sept
14,443Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,441Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
22Days played since 2026-07-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,441
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 90 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,464 below peak (13,700)
  • +3,358 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 2,764 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches343−40
Win rate33%51%−18pp
K/D6.104.23+1.87
Headshot %84%76%+8pp

Measured 10 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 4 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,606), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate73.0%43.8%44.9%above
Shot accuracy4.1%12.0%12.4%8.4% short
Kill/death ratio3.221.021.04above
Match win rate36.7%44.7%45.3%8.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRichiscookedFACEITLevel 5 · 1,441 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER12,236 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,441csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning73
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44506Last 10044%Win rateWLLLWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −5.5pp headshot accuracy · −29ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 20

  • 8102 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility5.5
Positioning7.3
Opening Duels6.7
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 47% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning7.3
Utility5.5
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels6.1
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time572ms−79ms
first ⅓ avg 651ms → last ⅓ avg 572ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–4 · nuke, 7 Sept
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · mirage, 9 Aug
391msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · ancient, 23 Aug
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 3 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 62% over 13mirageWeakest map · 26% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B23121152%0.01
mirageD1951426%0.01
nukeC1881044%0.04
ancientA138562%0.05
anubisB126650%0.02
infernoC73443%0.04
cache41325%-0.00
overpass2020%-0.01
train110100%0.09
vertigo1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (26% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

151,368Lifetime kills
3.22K/D · Top 1% of Level 5 players
2,319Matches
36.7%Match win rate
73.0%Headshot % · Top 1% of Level 5 players
4.1%Shot accuracy
4,257MVPs
803Hours (in match)
2,101Bombs planted
545Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,049nuke
2,301dust2
1,918inferno
1,831vertigo
374train
89office
57lake
28cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

184Matches
51%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
77.3ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5260%1.1316.6
Dust23738%0.9914.8
Nuke2343%1.1917.8
Inferno2250%1.1916.1
Anubis1968%1.1415.8
Ancient1839%1.0116.7
Vertigo967%1.4816.6
Train367%1.0113.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
42.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.6%Spray accuracy
75.7%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
568msReaction time
46.7%T opening success
61.8%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
9.37HE damage / grenade
14.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4854 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

26% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–11-0.0022%16 Sept
anubis9–130.0419%9 Sept
nuke5–130.1418%9 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0414%9 Sept
ancient13–40.017%9 Sept
dust28–13-0.0412%9 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0324%9 Sept
dust28–13-0.048%9 Sept
mirage13–160.0314%9 Sept
anubis2–13-0.0814%9 Sept
nuke13–100.077%9 Sept
overpass5–13-0.0411%9 Sept
dust213–8-0.0217%9 Sept
nuke15–150.0211%8 Sept
mirage13–70.0633%8 Sept
nuke13–100.0222%8 Sept
ancient13–30.1132%8 Sept
overpass9–130.0120%8 Sept
inferno8–80.0526%8 Sept
dust213–60.0824%8 Sept
anubis13–6-0.0518%8 Sept
cache7–130.0215%8 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0214%7 Sept
nuke13–40.2215%7 Sept
dust213–110.0418%7 Sept
dust213–90.0616%7 Sept
inferno13–110.0420%7 Sept
dust213–7-0.0217%7 Sept
inferno9–130.1825%7 Sept
ancient13–30.1714%7 Sept
nuke15–150.0613%7 Sept
anubis16–130.0515%7 Sept
dust213–30.1026%7 Sept
dust211–130.0433%6 Sept
ancient13–80.0514%6 Sept
nuke11–130.0221%6 Sept
nuke15–150.0324%5 Sept
anubis5–130.0411%5 Sept
nuke5–130.1329%5 Sept
cache13–100.0924%5 Sept
mirage13–90.1014%5 Sept
nuke13–100.0518%5 Sept
mirage0–70.0124%5 Sept
dust213–30.0913%5 Sept
inferno11–130.0311%4 Sept
dust213–90.0218%29 Aug
anubis13–40.0910%29 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0421%29 Aug
mirage13–110.0320%23 Aug
anubis13–90.0133%23 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0122%23 Aug
dust26–13-0.097%23 Aug
dust212–120.0917%22 Aug
mirage4–13-0.055%22 Aug
ancient5–130.0325%16 Aug
anubis13–110.0416%15 Aug
mirage2–11-0.0414%15 Aug
inferno13–40.0421%15 Aug
mirage8–130.0422%15 Aug
anubis11–130.0923%15 Aug
inferno12–120.0021%12 Aug
train13–100.0936%12 Aug
mirage9–130.0517%12 Aug
dust21–13-0.0626%12 Aug
ancient13–110.0117%11 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0517%10 Aug
dust22–13-0.0314%10 Aug
nuke13–50.0726%9 Aug
dust213–70.0221%9 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0026%9 Aug
nuke12–5-0.0511%9 Aug
mirage13–70.0737%9 Aug
nuke13–100.0412%9 Aug
ancient13–90.0816%9 Aug
dust213–60.0417%9 Aug
mirage12–160.078%8 Aug
dust28–13-0.0413%8 Aug
nuke11–130.0220%8 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0724%8 Aug
nuke7–130.0122%8 Aug
mirage6–130.0014%8 Aug
ancient10–130.0116%8 Aug
dust29–130.0422%6 Aug
dust26–13-0.0225%6 Aug
vertigo4–13-0.0217%6 Aug
mirage13–90.0516%6 Aug
anubis8–130.0212%3 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0312%3 Aug
anubis13–0-0.008%3 Aug
dust210–13-0.0019%3 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0616%2 Aug
mirage8–130.0315%2 Aug
ancient13–50.1132%2 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0417%2 Aug
cache3–13-0.0826%1 Aug
ancient13–30.0721%1 Aug
dust213–80.0415%26 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0410%26 Jul
cache5–13-0.047%26 Jul
dust213–90.0210%26 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →