PKDaniel

PKDaniel — CS2 Stats

SG76561199159223422[U:1:1198957694]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

919Tracked matches61%Win rate2022Tracked since
2,233Hours in CS30Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,999Top 50% of 200,982 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#80645 of 247906 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,157 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,999 +569 11 Aug – 30 Sept · 31 days played
17,36920,844peak 20,84411 Aug30 Sept
20,844Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,157Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-08-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,157
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 343 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7

Premier CS Rating

  • 845 below peak (20,844)
  • +688 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,327), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate45.6%48.2%50.9%5.4% short
Shot accuracy6.0%13.3%13.8%7.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.981.071.090.11 short
Match win rate42.3%46.9%48.4%6.1% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 10 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPKDanielFACEITLevel 9 · 2,157 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER19,999 · Purple bandPEAK ELO2,157csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning74
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–43–4Last 10053%Win rateWWWWTWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · −2.5pp headshot accuracy · −41ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–0–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 20

  • 10–8–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility5.1
Positioning7.4
Opening Duels5.2
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 561ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning7.4
Utility5.1
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels6.5
Win Impact8.6

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time564ms+30ms
first ⅓ avg 534ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%−0.0%
first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–1 · mirage, 20 Sept →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · mirage, 20 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 7–1 · ancient, 20 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 15 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W4Current streak
5–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 15nukeWeakest map · 47% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2010–1050%0.04
ancientB1910–953%0.03
nukeB178–947%0.03
dust2S1510–567%0.03
infernoB126–650%0.02
anubisB105–550%0.04
cacheA74–357%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

82,158Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
3,122Matches
42.3%Match win rate
45.6%Headshot %
6.0%Shot accuracy
9,472MVPs
2,358Hours (in match)
2,278Bombs planted
778Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4732,302
AWP13,270
Knife1,270
FAMAS1,123
MP9980

Lifetime map wins

3,671inferno
3,223dust2
2,102nuke
1,480vertigo
864lake
359train
340cbble
13bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

713Matches
51%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
82.4ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage22650%1.2817.0
Dust211150%1.2016.9
Ancient10255%1.2318.3
Anubis9951%1.2417.2
Inferno9554%1.2017.1
Vertigo3647%1.2415.9
Nuke3152%1.4719.6
Train450%0.7519.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.6%Spray accuracy
73.6%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
561msReaction time
51.6%T opening success
60.4%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
5.67HE damage / grenade
11.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4137 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–70.0819%1 Oct →
anubis13–100.0212%30 Sept →
anubis13–20.1517%30 Sept →
cache13–60.007%30 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0124%30 Sept →
nuke13–70.0416%29 Sept →
cache8–130.0519%29 Sept →
mirage12–160.0013%29 Sept →
mirage9–130.0220%27 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0212%27 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.0030%27 Sept →
mirage11–130.0613%27 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0311%27 Sept →
nuke8–80.0114%27 Sept →
nuke9–2-0.0725%27 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0913%25 Sept →
cache13–60.0317%25 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0516%25 Sept →
dust27–130.0025%24 Sept →
inferno13–3-0.0319%24 Sept →
ancient13–100.0814%24 Sept →
ancient13–80.0024%24 Sept →
dust212–120.0421%24 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0119%23 Sept →
mirage13–70.0224%20 Sept →
mirage13–10.2119%20 Sept →
ancient7–10.0417%20 Sept →
mirage13–30.1442%20 Sept →
anubis13–30.0718%18 Sept →
mirage10–130.0628%18 Sept →
cache13–60.1117%18 Sept →
ancient3–130.0121%18 Sept →
mirage13–50.0115%18 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0016%17 Sept →
nuke13–10.1217%17 Sept →
mirage12–120.0617%17 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0320%17 Sept →
dust213–60.0322%17 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.007%16 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.1042%16 Sept →
mirage13–20.0223%16 Sept →
nuke13–00.1627%15 Sept →
inferno12–70.1221%15 Sept →
mirage9–20.0914%13 Sept →
ancient13–60.0425%13 Sept →
ancient13–100.0520%12 Sept →
dust213–100.0418%11 Sept →
ancient13–60.0020%11 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0420%11 Sept →
nuke14–160.0414%9 Sept →
dust213–110.0917%9 Sept →
ancient6–130.0322%6 Sept →
mirage4–5-0.0713%6 Sept →
ancient10–130.0122%4 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0622%1 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0217%30 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0418%30 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0217%29 Aug →
ancient9–130.1018%29 Aug →
anubis13–60.1717%29 Aug →
dust213–16-0.0422%28 Aug →
ancient13–20.0212%28 Aug →
nuke13–100.0617%28 Aug →
nuke12–10.1223%27 Aug →
mirage13–10.1822%27 Aug →
nuke14–16-0.0220%27 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0420%26 Aug →
mirage13–10.1110%26 Aug →
inferno13–40.0920%26 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0117%23 Aug →
dust213–110.0517%23 Aug →
cache6–130.0316%23 Aug →
nuke13–30.1120%23 Aug →
cache13–90.1219%22 Aug →
ancient13–110.0725%22 Aug →
dust213–100.0413%22 Aug →
ancient13–20.0722%21 Aug →
anubis13–60.077%21 Aug →
nuke10–130.0020%21 Aug →
inferno13–40.0726%21 Aug →
inferno6–130.0615%20 Aug →
nuke1–130.0520%19 Aug →
anubis7–130.0118%19 Aug →
dust213–50.1237%19 Aug →
anubis10–130.0315%19 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0017%19 Aug →
inferno13–90.0720%18 Aug →
mirage13–50.0415%18 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0613%18 Aug →
nuke11–130.0611%16 Aug →
dust213–110.0122%16 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0124%16 Aug →
dust211–30.0019%16 Aug →
ancient13–70.1816%13 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0126%13 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0215%13 Aug →
mirage3–130.0429%13 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0210%12 Aug →
dust213–30.0620%11 Aug →
dust29–2-0.0028%11 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.