Connie

Connie — CS2 Stats

US76561199152277324[U:1:1192011596]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

693Tracked matches55%Win rate2022Tracked since
684Hours in CS21Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating17,531Purple band · top ~18.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 903 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+364Premier CS Rating · 17,167 → 17,531
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 26 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,531 +1,246 26 Jul20 Sept · 27 days played
15,00018,119peak 18,11926 Jul20 Sept
18,119Peak Premier in tracked matches
903Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-07-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 903
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 148 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 588 below peak (18,119)
  • +1,855 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,469 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,847), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate57.2%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy3.6%11.3%12.0%8.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.730.991.020.29 short
Match win rate36.8%43.9%44.7%8.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGConnieFACEITLevel 4 · 903 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER17,531 · Purple bandPEAK ELO903csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning58
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53443Last 10053%Win rateWWWWLWTWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +3.0pp headshot accuracy · −51ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility5.0
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch6.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 581ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.8
Utility5.0
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time585ms−76ms
first ⅓ avg 661ms → last ⅓ avg 585ms
Headshot accuracy22.3%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 21.8% → last ⅓ avg 22.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 26 Aug
65%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · dust2, 26 Jul
430msFastest reaction time · 13–0 · cache, 10 Sept
13–0Biggest win · cache, 10 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W4Current streak
612In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 65% over 17mirageWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A25141156%-0.00
infernoS1711665%0.02
cacheB168850%0.03
ancientA148657%0.02
mirageC135838%0.01
anubisB84450%-0.01
nukeC73443%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

18,987Lifetime kills
0.73K/D
1,164Matches
36.8%Match win rate
57.2%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 4 players
3.6%Shot accuracy
1,611MVPs
707Hours (in match)
961Bombs planted
182Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,204dust2
923inferno
621nuke
351train
209vertigo
35office
2ar_shoots
1ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

93Matches
49%Win rate
0.77Avg K/D
59.9ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

52%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24356%0.8012.8
Ancient1118%0.6813.4
Overpass967%0.7010.8
Mirage825%0.9613.3
Train771%0.8811.7
Nuke520%0.7514.4
Inferno450%0.386.3
Cache367%0.7310.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.6%Headshot accuracy
40.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.9%Spray accuracy
84.1%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
581msReaction time
28.2%T opening success
48.6%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
6.56HE damage / grenade
10.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.22% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–6-0.0032%20 Sept
anubis13–4-0.0219%19 Sept
inferno13–30.0826%19 Sept
nuke13–50.0438%17 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0411%16 Sept
cache13–7-0.0332%15 Sept
ancient15–150.0522%15 Sept
anubis6–0-0.067%15 Sept
dust27–130.0117%14 Sept
cache14–160.0618%12 Sept
inferno13–10.0516%12 Sept
mirage9–130.0118%11 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0110%10 Sept
anubis5–130.0111%10 Sept
cache13–00.0420%10 Sept
mirage2–13-0.1136%9 Sept
dust213–50.0924%9 Sept
ancient13–50.0420%9 Sept
inferno13–16-0.0227%9 Sept
dust27–13-0.0811%9 Sept
inferno13–100.0312%8 Sept
ancient10–130.0922%8 Sept
ancient13–110.0820%8 Sept
cache11–130.0821%8 Sept
cache13–7-0.0326%8 Sept
dust27–130.0227%8 Sept
anubis13–100.0931%7 Sept
dust216–130.0128%7 Sept
dust213–70.0729%7 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0213%6 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0350%4 Sept
dust29–13-0.0219%4 Sept
nuke13–110.0621%3 Sept
cache13–60.1219%3 Sept
dust213–90.007%2 Sept
inferno16–130.1129%2 Sept
inferno13–50.1219%2 Sept
cache15–150.0334%1 Sept
dust29–13-0.0214%1 Sept
mirage13–100.1118%31 Aug
ancient13–80.0213%31 Aug
mirage13–40.1123%31 Aug
cache6–130.0725%31 Aug
cache13–90.0941%31 Aug
dust27–13-0.0615%30 Aug
inferno13–30.0916%30 Aug
mirage10–130.0522%29 Aug
dust213–110.0927%29 Aug
mirage13–100.0419%29 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0521%29 Aug
dust27–130.0120%29 Aug
cache15–150.0117%29 Aug
mirage7–130.0514%28 Aug
inferno13–90.0016%28 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0523%26 Aug
cache3–130.0335%26 Aug
dust213–30.1524%26 Aug
cache13–40.0413%26 Aug
ancient13–80.0517%26 Aug
dust213–40.0215%25 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0311%18 Aug
cache13–9-0.0219%18 Aug
cache13–7-0.0420%18 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0132%17 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0420%17 Aug
dust213–9-0.089%14 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0533%14 Aug
dust211–13-0.0336%13 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0410%13 Aug
dust28–13-0.0523%13 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0624%12 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0310%12 Aug
dust213–10-0.0215%11 Aug
dust213–2-0.0422%11 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0224%8 Aug
cache7–13-0.0317%8 Aug
dust214–16-0.0717%2 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0424%2 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0718%27 Jul
nuke13–60.034%27 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0529%27 Jul
ancient13–100.0021%27 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0216%27 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0417%27 Jul
ancient7–130.0417%27 Jul
dust210–13-0.0729%26 Jul
nuke10–130.0220%26 Jul
dust213–9-0.0613%26 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0225%26 Jul
mirage13–60.0614%26 Jul
nuke12–16-0.0210%26 Jul
dust213–70.0165%26 Jul
ancient13–110.0620%26 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0123%26 Jul
inferno14–160.0124%26 Jul
dust213–100.0039%26 Jul
inferno13–100.0028%26 Jul
anubis14–160.0126%26 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0712%26 Jul
cache10–130.0128%26 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →