EL Tuominen

EL Tuominen — CS2 Stats

76561199151628503[U:1:1191362775]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,800Tracked matches33%Win rate2021Tracked since
3,018Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating15,774Purple band · top ~25.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,452 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Oct 2026 (35 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,774 -1,834 25 Aug – 1 Oct · 17 days played
15,77418,302peak 18,30225 Aug1 Oct
19,008Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,452Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
23Days played since 2026-08-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,452
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 79 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,528 below peak (18,302)
  • -2,398 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,226 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate54.7%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy4.9%12.7%13.0%8.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.151.051.06above
Match win rate48.2%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEL TuominenFACEITLevel 7 · 1,452 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER15,774 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,452csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning49
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42–51–7Last 10042%Win rateLLLLWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −3.1pp headshot accuracy · +14ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 20

  • 7–11–2 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility5.2
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 567ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.9
Utility5.2
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time570ms−3ms
first ⅓ avg 573ms → last ⅓ avg 570ms
Headshot accuracy28.4%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 27.9% → last ⅓ avg 28.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–11 · nuke, 30 Aug →
53%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · train, 16 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · vertigo, 24 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 30 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L4Current streak
6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 59% over 17vertigoWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA1710–759%0.05
infernoC166–1038%0.01
nukeA148–657%0.03
ancientB137–654%0.00
cacheD93–633%0.02
mirageD82–625%0.00
dust2D62–433%-0.00
vertigoD51–420%0.01
office—41–325%0.02
train—41–325%0.01
italy—21–150%0.07
overpass—10–10%-0.00
boulder—10–10%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

130,181Lifetime kills
1.15K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
5,817Matches
48.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
54.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players
4.9%Shot accuracy
16,644MVPs
3,018Hours (in match)
2,596Bombs planted
1,734Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4748,365
AWP12,994
MP92,904
FAMAS2,540
SSG 081,827

Lifetime map wins

11,239vertigo
10,418inferno
5,520nuke
3,264dust2
2,307train
1,855office
410italy
87lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

210Matches
53%Win rate
1.40Avg K/D
96.2ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
32%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient4963%1.6421.2
Inferno4351%1.3419.5
Anubis2959%1.3218.5
Mirage2843%1.1316.5
Nuke1844%1.4619.1
Dust21553%1.3217.7
Vertigo1050%1.7421.1
Train862%1.3320.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.7%Headshot accuracy
30.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
26.7%Spray accuracy
69.8%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
567msReaction time
34.2%T opening success
39.1%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
10.70HE damage / grenade
7.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.1958% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategy →Vertigo grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke6–13-0.0719%1 Oct →
inferno1–13-0.0019%1 Oct →
nuke0–13-0.0623%27 Sept →
office1–13-0.0031%27 Sept →
anubis13–90.0723%26 Sept →
train0–6-0.0338%26 Sept →
vertigo5–13-0.0233%25 Sept →
vertigo1–13-0.0216%25 Sept →
ancient13–70.0625%25 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0215%25 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0331%25 Sept →
cache11–30.1026%25 Sept →
nuke13–10.0828%25 Sept →
mirage13–40.0124%25 Sept →
cache12–120.0325%24 Sept →
office13–20.0823%24 Sept →
vertigo4–13-0.0433%24 Sept →
vertigo12–120.0718%24 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0328%24 Sept →
nuke13–30.0536%24 Sept →
office10–130.0135%18 Sept →
italy7–130.0624%17 Sept →
train5–13-0.0028%17 Sept →
nuke12–120.0239%16 Sept →
mirage7–130.0136%16 Sept →
train13–70.0353%16 Sept →
inferno9–7-0.0129%16 Sept →
overpass3–13-0.0029%16 Sept →
anubis13–90.0432%16 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0237%16 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0031%15 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0125%15 Sept →
inferno13–50.0328%14 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0616%14 Sept →
inferno16–140.0132%13 Sept →
anubis13–90.0524%13 Sept →
anubis11–130.0127%9 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0813%9 Sept →
ancient8–20.0518%9 Sept →
ancient4–130.1025%6 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0426%6 Sept →
nuke13–60.0321%6 Sept →
anubis11–130.0928%6 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0029%6 Sept →
inferno16–130.1023%6 Sept →
anubis16–130.0219%6 Sept →
ancient13–70.0418%6 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0034%6 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0130%6 Sept →
ancient12–16-0.0218%6 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0719%5 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0029%4 Sept →
inferno9–130.0130%4 Sept →
dust27–130.0136%4 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0225%3 Sept →
mirage13–90.0324%3 Sept →
inferno13–80.0818%3 Sept →
inferno7–130.0223%2 Sept →
nuke13–70.0240%2 Sept →
anubis6–130.0720%2 Sept →
anubis7–130.0813%2 Sept →
inferno5–130.0323%2 Sept →
nuke16–140.0613%2 Sept →
ancient13–90.0121%2 Sept →
nuke13–110.1515%30 Aug →
cache9–130.0124%30 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0016%30 Aug →
anubis13–30.0939%30 Aug →
ancient13–00.0716%30 Aug →
anubis7–00.0331%30 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.0533%30 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0316%30 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0120%30 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0020%29 Aug →
anubis13–60.1228%29 Aug →
anubis13–100.0922%29 Aug →
italy13–10.0944%28 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0429%28 Aug →
ancient12–12-0.0730%28 Aug →
office7–13-0.0121%28 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0024%28 Aug →
nuke13–90.0226%28 Aug →
inferno11–130.0116%27 Aug →
boulder1–13-0.0715%27 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0124%26 Aug →
nuke14–160.0017%26 Aug →
cache10–130.0122%26 Aug →
inferno8–130.0138%25 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0221%25 Aug →
cache13–90.0428%25 Aug →
nuke13–40.0644%25 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0129%25 Aug →
train12–120.0243%25 Aug →
vertigo13–30.0452%25 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0336%25 Aug →
anubis13–50.0628%25 Aug →
nuke5–130.0221%25 Aug →
mirage8–130.0332%25 Aug →
cache12–120.0419%25 Aug →
dust213–90.0737%25 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.