Diktaattori

Diktaattori — CS2 Stats

YE76561199140140107[U:1:1179874379]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

325Tracked matches57%Win rate2021Tracked since
831Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating7,122Light Blue band · top ~68.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2 · 748 ELOTop 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+401Premier CS Rating · 6,721 → 7,122
0Faceit ELO · 748 → 748
+1Tracked matches · now 325
+3.3ppWin rate · 53.3% → 56.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 61 days played since 30 Aug 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 7,122 +2,891 27 Sept18 Sept · 20 days played
4,2317,298peak 7,29827 Sept18 Sept
7,298Peak Premier in tracked matches
748Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
61Days played since 2024-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 748
  • Next: Level 3 at 751 3 to go
  • Reached: Level 2
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-13

Premier CS Rating

  • 176 below peak (7,298)
  • +290 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 2,878 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches1
Win rate100%
K/D0.95
Headshot %50%

Measured 11 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,197), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate51.3%41.3%41.9%above
Shot accuracy13.1%12.7%12.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.910.960.980.07 short
Match win rate38.9%42.5%43.3%4.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDiktaattoriFACEITLevel 2 · 748 ELOSTANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER7,122 · Light Blue bandPEAK ELO748csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning57
Utility21

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50464Last 10050%Win rateWWLLWWLTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +4.8pp headshot accuracy · −51ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 621ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 647ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility2.1
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels5.4
Clutch2.6

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 668ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning5.7
Utility2.1
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels5.0
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time649ms−93ms
first ⅓ avg 742ms → last ⅓ avg 649ms
Headshot accuracy27.8%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 25.1% → last ⅓ avg 27.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.33Best match rating · 9–1 · vertigo, 23 Sept
45%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · nuke, 6 Aug
484msFastest reaction time · 4–9 · inferno, 27 Aug
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 29 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 67% over 6dust2Weakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA27151256%0.02
infernoC2191243%0.00
nukeB20101050%-0.01
ancientB115645%0.02
vertigoS64267%0.07
anubisC52340%0.01
dust2D51420%0.04
overpass32167%-0.05
office110100%-0.05
train110100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

13,192Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
933Matches
38.9%Match win rate
51.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 2 players
13.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 2 players
1,928MVPs
399Hours (in match)
531Bombs planted
125Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,001vertigo
713inferno
649dust2
554nuke
150train
71lake
5cbble
4office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

50Matches
44%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
72.2ADR
62%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2055%0.8712.9
Nuke714%0.7612.6
Inferno743%1.1813.3
Dust2617%0.9117.3
Anubis560%0.9214.8
Ancient333%0.9816.3
Vertigo1100%1.0014.0
Train1100%1.3121.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.5%Headshot accuracy
37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.6%Spray accuracy
86.6%Counter-strafing
6.3°Preaim
668msReaction time
44.0%T opening success
56.1%CT opening success
0.31Enemies flashed / flash
1.0%Flash assists
12.63HE damage / grenade
1.71Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3115 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–110.0034%18 Sept
inferno13–4-0.0123%10 Sept
inferno3–9-0.1622%9 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0329%6 Sept
inferno13–60.0935%28 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0232%27 Aug
overpass4–9-0.0636%27 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0638%27 Aug
inferno4–9-0.1133%27 Aug
mirage11–130.0336%25 Aug
nuke13–90.0117%24 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0626%24 Aug
inferno4–9-0.0519%22 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0919%15 Aug
inferno13–50.0138%15 Aug
inferno3–9-0.1815%15 Aug
mirage16–140.0224%14 Aug
mirage4–00.0838%14 Aug
dust213–50.0430%11 Aug
nuke11–130.0145%6 Aug
inferno2–13-0.114%6 Aug
nuke6–9-0.0919%6 Aug
dust27–130.0227%5 Aug
mirage13–40.0418%5 Aug
mirage11–130.0625%2 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0134%2 Aug
nuke9–7-0.0318%31 Jul
nuke9–4-0.0214%31 Jul
inferno9–60.1744%31 Jul
ancient13–40.1419%31 Jul
mirage13–50.2241%29 Jul
mirage5–130.0025%21 Jul
ancient13–160.0338%21 Jul
mirage6–130.0138%19 Jul
ancient13–90.0045%19 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0310%17 Jul
inferno13–20.1424%15 Jul
ancient13–60.0522%14 Jul
mirage7–130.1019%13 Jul
anubis13–80.0631%12 Jul
dust22–60.2430%12 Jul
inferno5–9-0.0322%2 Jul
nuke5–9-0.0414%2 Jul
overpass9–4-0.0733%30 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0726%11 Mar
overpass13–9-0.0237%27 Feb
nuke13–30.0619%22 Feb
nuke9–7-0.0025%13 Feb
office4–4-0.0525%7 Feb
nuke4–13-0.0831%7 Feb
anubis7–130.0235%3 Feb
inferno13–90.0540%2 Feb
anubis3–13-0.0513%1 Feb
ancient11–130.0036%1 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0024%1 Feb
mirage13–00.0242%29 Jan
mirage13–50.0726%29 Jan
mirage4–13-0.0126%28 Jan
mirage3–12-0.0217%16 Jan
mirage13–30.1128%16 Jan
nuke5–130.1435%16 Jan
inferno11–50.0731%16 Jan
inferno5–9-0.0636%14 Jan
vertigo9–70.0321%2 Jan
train13–110.0619%29 Dec
mirage13–9-0.0319%29 Dec
ancient8–13-0.0026%26 Dec
nuke13–9-0.0138%29 Nov
mirage13–7-0.0412%25 Nov
inferno8–80.0722%19 Nov
inferno13–60.1617%4 Nov
nuke0–50.0733%31 Jul
inferno13–110.1327%13 Feb
mirage12–160.0318%5 Feb
mirage13–30.0520%5 Feb
inferno11–13-0.0124%1 Feb
dust210–13-0.0326%18 Oct
anubis13–60.0933%17 Oct
vertigo12–12-0.0333%16 Oct
nuke13–30.0323%16 Oct
ancient11–130.0435%16 Oct
mirage13–30.0324%14 Oct
nuke11–130.0517%14 Oct
ancient13–50.0435%12 Oct
ancient4–13-0.0823%12 Oct
ancient6–13-0.0424%12 Oct
nuke15–15-0.0124%5 Oct
mirage13–10-0.0135%5 Oct
dust29–13-0.0822%4 Oct
vertigo13–8-0.0228%30 Sept
mirage3–13-0.1118%30 Sept
nuke5–9-0.0913%29 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0418%27 Sept
mirage13–80.0317%27 Sept
vertigo13–40.1729%27 Sept
nuke13–40.0640%27 Sept
nuke2–9-0.2522%27 Sept
vertigo9–10.3327%23 Sept
vertigo2–13-0.0427%30 Aug
nuke9–60.0626%30 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →